Yes, I’m incredibly posh.ClaretAndJew wrote:You pronounce Bradford like Ward?
No Sam Vokes ?
-
TheFamilyCat
- Posts: 10898
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
-
Goobs
- Posts: 4399
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1462 times
- Has Liked: 995 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
Yeah Bradfud and WudClaretAndJew wrote:You pronounce Bradford like Ward?
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 30616
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11032 times
- Has Liked: 5644 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
the club is run like a business, this is not what do "I" think the club should do it's what I expect any business to doDazzler wrote:So after 6 & half years of service the club should give no consideration to Vokes as to where he would prefer to ply his trade next ?
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 30616
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11032 times
- Has Liked: 5644 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
agree, only passing on the info and pointing out that if he did in fact get sold for anything like 14 then Vokes at 9 would be underpricedmybloodisclaret wrote:14 mill for Forestieri? Top bantz that from the Owls. Good on em.
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
To force a player to go where he doesn't want to go?Vegas Claret wrote:the club is run like a business, this is not what do "I" think the club should do it's what I expect any business to do
-
piston broke
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1447 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
He only goes where he signs up for. 3 year contract the ball is clearly in his court.Dazzler wrote:To force a player to go where he doesn't want to go?
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
Vegas seems to be suggesting the club sell to the highest bidder without consideration towards Vokes...piston broke wrote:He only goes where he signs up for. 3 year contract the ball is clearly in his court.
-
piston broke
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1447 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
That's my point the club can tell him who have offered the most but the decision to sign is in his hands. He can tell the club "no thanks"Dazzler wrote:Vegas seems to be suggesting the club sell to the highest bidder without consideration towards Vokes...
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 30616
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11032 times
- Has Liked: 5644 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
Dazzler wrote:Vegas seems to be suggesting the club sell to the highest bidder without consideration towards Vokes...
jesus ******* wept, if Stoke come in and offer 9 million and Crewe come in and offer 50 million do you expect the club to accept the Stoke offer ? Neither do I
If Sam turns the move down isn't the debate here
Re: No Sam Vokes ?
aye but Crewe might be offering him 80k a week,Stoke might be only offering 40k...Vegas Claret wrote:jesus ******* wept, if Stoke come in and offer 9 million and Crewe come in and offer 50 million do you expect the club to accept the Stoke offer ? Neither do I
If Sam turns the move down isn't the debate here
