IndigoLake wrote:Dyche on Crouch: "We know he's a good character"
I wonder if he’ll get Steven Reid’s spot in the changing rooms.
Holtyclaret wrote:He’s a bloody stop gap until the summer. Stop whinging, it’ll be fun and we’re no worse off. Winge away at the end of summer UTC
Tinribs wrote:Because Vokes wanted to leave so do you hold on to aunhappy players who’s value will keep going down ?
Crouch takes Vokes place on the bench and I’d rather have crouch in a 15 minute cameo than Vokes
jrgbfc wrote:Crouch is British, experienced and a good sort for the dressing room. Seem to the main criteria for Dyche when it comes to new signings unfortunately.
willsclarets wrote:if one of Barnes or Wood get injured, which they might very well not...
We'll play Vydra off Wood/Barnes, or we'll play 451, or we'll start with Crouch.
By the way, why is everyone so sure that Crouch can't play 70+ minutes. Or a whole game even?
Tall Paul wrote:Maybe they haven't done it for the money, they've probably done it because they didn't want to stand in Vokes' way when he wants to go and play first team football for Stoke.
Reckoner wrote:Sam wanted to play, and he deserves it. Really disappointed to see him go but I think this Crouch is a decent option in the circumstances.
Lets face it the majority of you cry and moan because you like to cry and moan. Doesn't matter what is happening at any given time.
scouseclaret wrote:... and I love this quote:
"I've never been too bothered about people's age, we had Michael Duff, a fantastic servant to this club, and also for myself, at 37, in the Premier League, so that's not an issue.”
Peter Crouch is 38, by which time even Duffer had called it a day!
scouseclaret wrote:Really? I dare say Che Adams would like to move to a Premier League club, but Birmingham are telling him he can’t. We keep getting told how difficult it is to do deals in January, but apparently not if we’re selling it’s not.
Cleveleys_claret wrote:Yet at every other club it is the club that say you arent going anywhere....except us that see pound signs.
DCWat wrote:Don’t bloody bank on it
willsclarets wrote:Age is but a number. He's never relied on pace, has a good touch and dangerous in the box. Welcome to Burnley Crouchy, can't wait to see you wear claret and blue. The more I think about this signing the better it gets #legendinthemaking
Reckoner wrote:Insinuating that the club / board are just acting for their own personal financial gain just weakens any argument you might make about the detriment to the team from Vokes leaving. I think Vokes has been a great player but he has also been bitterly disappointed at not playing. We'll never know the full story about any of the transfer discussions (in or out) and on the face of things you may disagree with some decisions by the club / board. But they deserve trust and respect for everything they have achieved recently, not childish insinuations.
bobinho wrote:If this is real, and I hope it isn’t, I mean I REALLY hope it isn’t, then I would have to question what we are really after here.
This is utterly bizarre.
Please someone tell me CFC started this...
willsclarets wrote:Doesn't mean he's not able to play longer.
Cleveleys_claret wrote:What else would you call it? We have sold a player at the first opportunity. Every board room in the land must laugh when dealing with us.
Users browsing this forum: AndrewJB, barba, Bordeauxclaret, Bullabill, Clarets4me, Devils_Advocate, elwaclaret, Lancasterclaret, MACCA, martin_p, Murger, nil_desperandum, Quickenthetempo, RingoMcCartney, SGr, Spijed, Steve-Harpers-perm, Swizzlestick, thatdberight, tim_noone, TonbridgeClaret, WadingInDeeper and 92 guests