Barnes

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Barnes

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:58 pm

Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 2980
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 825 times
Has Liked: 1609 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Barnes

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:02 pm

According to Stelling and Phil Thompson clear penalty and goalkeeper made no contact with the ball and made contact with Barnes.
This user liked this post: turfytopper

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:03 pm

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:According to Stelling and Phil Thompson clear penalty and goalkeeper made no contact with the ball and made contact with Barnes.
He's fishing. Without a rod.
These 4 users liked this post: longsidepies ZizkovClaret THEWELLERNUT70 Greenmile

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 2980
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 825 times
Has Liked: 1609 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Barnes

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:05 pm

To top it off Sam Vokes wins a penalty but he steps up and misses it

CnBtruntru
Posts: 4133
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
Been Liked: 694 times
Has Liked: 600 times
Location: Wexford, Ireland. via Nelson.

Re: Barnes

Post by CnBtruntru » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:38 pm

But Barnes didn't

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8069
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 5023 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Barnes

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:40 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.
Your busy today, you'll have no bait left for tomorrow if you keep it up.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Barnes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:56 pm

It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:02 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.
Fair enough. Can you fathom why a yellow card was given?
This user liked this post: Hozz

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10843
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5521 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Barnes

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:05 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Fair enough. Can you fathom why a yellow card was given?
I think it was one of those that can only be one of two things: a foul and therefore penalty or a dive. If he thinks it’s a dive, he’s got to book him.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10917 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Barnes

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:08 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.
you are as blatant as Saxo was

1968claret
Posts: 1022
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 504 times
Has Liked: 635 times

Re: Barnes

Post by 1968claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:09 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.
Heck, which replays have you seen? The ones I have seen show it be a clear penalty. Keeper makes no contact with ball and plenty of contact with Ash.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

Guller Bull
Posts: 2526
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 763 times
Has Liked: 1001 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Guller Bull » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:10 pm

Wasn't the yellow for Barnes berating the lino?
These 2 users liked this post: ZizkovClaret Tricky Trevor

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Barnes

Post by duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:13 pm

BBC seems to suggest he got a yellow for diving, folk seem to suggest it was for dissent. Which be it?

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:16 pm

FactualFrank wrote:He's fishing. Without a rod.
I'd say being a tool

Tall Paul
Posts: 7171
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2560 times
Has Liked: 690 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Tall Paul » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:17 pm

Looked like the ref was going to book him before he started slating the linesman so it must've been for simulation.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11410
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3170 times
Has Liked: 1848 times
Contact:

Re: Barnes

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:18 pm

Tall Paul wrote:Looked like the ref was going to book him before he started slating the linesman so it must've been for simulation.
If that’s the case then I’m surprised he didn’t give him a second yellow for the dissent

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:19 pm

1968claret wrote:Heck, which replays have you seen? The ones I have seen show it be a clear penalty. Keeper makes no contact with ball and plenty of contact with Ash.
Another one who has the benefit of a magical TV camera angle that on one else on the planet has seen

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Barnes

Post by duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:20 pm

I haven't seen it, but what was the end result of the incident? If it's a goal kick then it must be for dissent, if it's a free kick then it can only be for diving. No?

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 4600
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1020 times
Has Liked: 3163 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Taffy on the wing » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:21 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.
BULLSHIT!

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:22 pm

Taken from a match report

"Burnley were, however, somehow denied a penalty when goalkeeper McCarthy clattered into Barnes in the Southampton penalty area - they were last awarded a spot-kick 67 games ago - and instead referee Anthony Taylor booked the striker for simulation."

agreenwood
Posts: 3095
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1712 times
Has Liked: 269 times

Re: Barnes

Post by agreenwood » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:24 pm

It was a clear penalty. There really is no debate.
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank THEWELLERNUT70

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Barnes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:26 pm

It certainly wasn’t a clattering. Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:27 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It certainly wasn’t a clattering. Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.
Buffering?
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10843
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5521 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Barnes

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:28 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.
Should have been even ******* easier for Taylor to see it then.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Barnes

Post by TVC15 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:29 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.
You really don’t like Burnley much do you ?
Blatant penalty.

Why do you think it wasn’t given then ?
Goalkeeper caught Barnes as he took ball past him. Unless you think the keeper did not touch Barnes ?

Tall Paul
Posts: 7171
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2560 times
Has Liked: 690 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Tall Paul » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:30 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:If that’s the case then I’m surprised he didn’t give him a second yellow for the dissent
Yeah. I was worried about a second yellow.

Oshkoshclaret
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 317 times
Has Liked: 83 times
Location: Dallas, TX & Jefferson, MD
Contact:

Re: Barnes

Post by Oshkoshclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:31 pm

I want some of the drugs the OP is on
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3940
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 490 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Hibsclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:31 pm

agreenwood wrote:It was a clear penalty. There really is no debate.
Absolutely.

Thought we would never get a pen all season if he can’t give that. How can the ref or lino not see it. Unbelievable.

The ref was an absolute disgrace all afternoon.

How can he not book their player early on with the worst foul of the game. It felt like he was giving them everything.

Completely different game and potentially scoreline if we get the first pen. Potentially lost 6 points in the last 3 games just from inept officials. Best league in the world. Really....
These 8 users liked this post: Taffy on the wing Rick_Muller Rumpelstiltskin BFCmaj SussexDon1inIreland Ashingtonclaret46 strayclaret claretgimmer

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Barnes

Post by duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:34 pm

Was Arfield the last player booked for diving? (if memory serves, it was neither a penalty nor a dive....Everton appen, our 24 pass goal game?)

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:37 pm

Hibsclaret wrote:Absolutely.

Thought we would never get a pen all season if he can’t give that. How can the ref or lino not see it. Unbelievable.

The ref was an absolute disgrace all afternoon.

How can he not book their player early on with the worst foul of the game. It felt like he was giving them everything.

Completely different game and potentially scoreline if we get the first pen. Potentially lost 6 points in the last 3 games just from inept officials. Best league in the world. Really....
With utterly sh!t not up to standard officiating teams for the most part

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Barnes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:38 pm

TVC15 wrote:You really don’t like Burnley much do you ?
Blatant penalty.

Why do you think it wasn’t given then ?
Goalkeeper caught Barnes as he took ball past him. Unless you think the keeper did not touch Barnes ?
Yes, I really don’t like Burnley at all :roll:

I thought Barnes was looking for it and didn’t need to go down. Have you seen the replays? Fair enough if you think otherwise.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12345
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5202 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:39 pm

Thought it was a definite pen but the way Barnes deliberately moved his foot to ensure he caught the keeper had similarities to the Pope against Man City and the Glen Murray (not so much so)pens that a fair few on here were outraged at them being given as pens against us

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3940
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 490 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Hibsclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:49 pm

Was nothing like the Bernardo Silva one if that’s what you mean.

Either way they get given against us and not for us. Never mind they even up over the season. Bs

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:52 pm

Guller Bull wrote:Wasn't the yellow for Barnes berating the lino?
No. The card comes before that.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:53 pm

Every single report on the game ive read and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious
Last edited by THEWELLERNUT70 on Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12345
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5202 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:55 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Every single report on the game and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious
Apart from the OP who was obviously on the wind up (very successfully) who on this thread has said it wasnt a penalty?

Guller Bull
Posts: 2526
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 763 times
Has Liked: 1001 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Guller Bull » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:55 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:No. The card comes before that.
Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm

Guller Bull wrote:Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.
You can’t appeal a yellow. The utterly abysmal Ref has got away scot free.
This user liked this post: claret wizard

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Barnes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Every single report on the game and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious
Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.
Last edited by BurnleyFC on Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:57 pm

Guller Bull wrote:Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.
Not sure yellow cards can be appealed.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:57 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Apart from the OP who was obviously on the wind up (very successfully) who on this thread has said it wasnt a penalty?
"A couple on here" ;)

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.
BBC Reporter thought it was. I forget her name - the fit one. She said it was a penalty and 1-1 was about right.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Oh right that's where you got your viewpoint from. I get you now :D

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Barnes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:00 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Oh right that's where you got your viewpoint from. I get you now :D
Not quite.

I was on the game. My lad was on the pitch at half time.

Is it really that strange to want to get an opinion from journalists that have access to replays?
Last edited by BurnleyFC on Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

taio
Posts: 11520
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3220 times
Has Liked: 340 times

Re: Barnes

Post by taio » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:00 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.
You're talking absolute shite. Stone wall penalty. Clueless if you think otherwise.

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:02 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.
The card came out before the tantrum. I seriously thought Barnes was going to talk himself into a red.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 997 times
Has Liked: 2007 times

Re: Barnes

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:04 pm

https://www.facebook.com/95899604080401 ... 676173139/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12345
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5202 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Barnes

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:05 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:The card came out before the tantrum. I seriously thought Barnes was going to talk himself into a red.
Yep it was definitely coming out before but when someone gets booked for a foul or diving they can get away with a fair bit of dissent without getting the red. Means if youre getting booked anyway you might as well have a good old shout and moan about it

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Barnes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:08 pm

That clip is sped up. Looks like something out of a Benny Hill sketch.

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Barnes

Post by duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:09 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Penalty all day long, whether it's 1819, 1919 or 2019! It's so silly we didn't get a penalty for that. It might still have ended up one all, but crikey!
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

Post Reply