Barnes

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
# 1
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 14168
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 5532 times
Has Liked: 8018 times

Barnes

Postby cricketfieldclarets » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:58 pm

Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

# 2
DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 1135
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 327 times
Has Liked: 755 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Barnes

Postby DAVETHEVICAR » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:02 pm

According to Stelling and Phil Thompson clear penalty and goalkeeper made no contact with the ball and made contact with Barnes.
This user liked this post: turfytopper

# 3
FactualFrank
Posts: 13095
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3459 times
Has Liked: 6099 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Postby FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:03 pm

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:According to Stelling and Phil Thompson clear penalty and goalkeeper made no contact with the ball and made contact with Barnes.


He's fishing. Without a rod.
These 4 users liked this post: longsidepies ZizkovClaret THEWELLERNUT70 Greenmile

# 4
DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 1135
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 327 times
Has Liked: 755 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Barnes

Postby DAVETHEVICAR » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:05 pm

To top it off Sam Vokes wins a penalty but he steps up and misses it

# 5
CnBtruntru
Posts: 2738
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
Been Liked: 502 times
Has Liked: 341 times
Location: Wexford, Ireland. via Nelson.

Re: Barnes

Postby CnBtruntru » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:38 pm

But Barnes didn't

# 6
Colburn_Claret
Posts: 3031
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 1226 times
Has Liked: 1646 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Barnes

Postby Colburn_Claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:40 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

Your busy today, you'll have no bait left for tomorrow if you keep it up.

# 7
BurnleyFC
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: Barnes

Postby BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:56 pm

It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

# 8
Lord Beamish
Posts: 3510
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 2394 times
Has Liked: 1392 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:02 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.

Fair enough. Can you fathom why a yellow card was given?
This user liked this post: Hozz

# 9
TheFamilyCat
Posts: 3806
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 61 times

Re: Barnes

Postby TheFamilyCat » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:05 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Fair enough. Can you fathom why a yellow card was given?


I think it was one of those that can only be one of two things: a foul and therefore penalty or a dive. If he thinks it’s a dive, he’s got to book him.

# 10
Vegas Claret
Posts: 12020
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 3642 times
Has Liked: 1629 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Barnes

Postby Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:08 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.


you are as blatant as Saxo was

# 11
1968claret
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 349 times
Has Liked: 528 times

Re: Barnes

Postby 1968claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:09 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.


Heck, which replays have you seen? The ones I have seen show it be a clear penalty. Keeper makes no contact with ball and plenty of contact with Ash.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

# 12
Guller Bull
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 146 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Guller Bull » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:10 pm

Wasn't the yellow for Barnes berating the lino?
These 2 users liked this post: ZizkovClaret Tricky Trevor

# 13
duncandisorderly
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 552 times
Has Liked: 136 times

Re: Barnes

Postby duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:13 pm

BBC seems to suggest he got a yellow for diving, folk seem to suggest it was for dissent. Which be it?

# 14
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:16 pm

FactualFrank wrote:He's fishing. Without a rod.


I'd say being a tool

# 15
Tall Paul
Posts: 4326
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 1500 times
Has Liked: 336 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Tall Paul » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:17 pm

Looked like the ref was going to book him before he started slating the linesman so it must've been for simulation.

# 16
wilks_bfc
Posts: 4119
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1219 times
Has Liked: 610 times
Contact:

Re: Barnes

Postby wilks_bfc » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:18 pm

Tall Paul wrote:Looked like the ref was going to book him before he started slating the linesman so it must've been for simulation.


If that’s the case then I’m surprised he didn’t give him a second yellow for the dissent

# 17
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:19 pm

1968claret wrote:Heck, which replays have you seen? The ones I have seen show it be a clear penalty. Keeper makes no contact with ball and plenty of contact with Ash.


Another one who has the benefit of a magical TV camera angle that on one else on the planet has seen

# 18
duncandisorderly
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 552 times
Has Liked: 136 times

Re: Barnes

Postby duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:20 pm

I haven't seen it, but what was the end result of the incident? If it's a goal kick then it must be for dissent, if it's a free kick then it can only be for diving. No?

# 19
Taffy on the wing
Posts: 333
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 95 times
Has Liked: 310 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Taffy on the wing » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:21 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

BULLSHIT!

# 20
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:22 pm

Taken from a match report

"Burnley were, however, somehow denied a penalty when goalkeeper McCarthy clattered into Barnes in the Southampton penalty area - they were last awarded a spot-kick 67 games ago - and instead referee Anthony Taylor booked the striker for simulation."

# 21
agreenwood
Posts: 909
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 415 times
Has Liked: 79 times

Re: Barnes

Postby agreenwood » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:24 pm

It was a clear penalty. There really is no debate.
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank THEWELLERNUT70

# 22
BurnleyFC
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: Barnes

Postby BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:26 pm

It certainly wasn’t a clattering. Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.

# 23
FactualFrank
Posts: 13095
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3459 times
Has Liked: 6099 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Postby FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:27 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It certainly wasn’t a clattering. Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.


Buffering?
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

# 24
TheFamilyCat
Posts: 3806
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 61 times

Re: Barnes

Postby TheFamilyCat » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:28 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.


Should have been even ******* easier for Taylor to see it then.

# 25
TVC15
Posts: 4512
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 1737 times
Has Liked: 254 times

Re: Barnes

Postby TVC15 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:29 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.


You really don’t like Burnley much do you ?
Blatant penalty.

Why do you think it wasn’t given then ?
Goalkeeper caught Barnes as he took ball past him. Unless you think the keeper did not touch Barnes ?

# 26
Tall Paul
Posts: 4326
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 1500 times
Has Liked: 336 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Tall Paul » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:30 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:If that’s the case then I’m surprised he didn’t give him a second yellow for the dissent


Yeah. I was worried about a second yellow.

# 27
Oshkoshclaret
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 179 times
Has Liked: 46 times
Location: Dallas, TX & Jefferson, MD
Contact:

Re: Barnes

Postby Oshkoshclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:31 pm

I want some of the drugs the OP is on
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin

# 28
Hibsclaret
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 241 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Hibsclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:31 pm

agreenwood wrote:It was a clear penalty. There really is no debate.


Absolutely.

Thought we would never get a pen all season if he can’t give that. How can the ref or lino not see it. Unbelievable.

The ref was an absolute disgrace all afternoon.

How can he not book their player early on with the worst foul of the game. It felt like he was giving them everything.

Completely different game and potentially scoreline if we get the first pen. Potentially lost 6 points in the last 3 games just from inept officials. Best league in the world. Really....
These 8 users liked this post: Taffy on the wing Rick_Muller Rumpelstiltskin BFCmaj SussexDon1inIreland Ashingtonclaret46 strayclaret claretgimmer

# 29
duncandisorderly
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 552 times
Has Liked: 136 times

Re: Barnes

Postby duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:34 pm

Was Arfield the last player booked for diving? (if memory serves, it was neither a penalty nor a dive....Everton appen, our 24 pass goal game?)

# 30
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:37 pm

Hibsclaret wrote:Absolutely.

Thought we would never get a pen all season if he can’t give that. How can the ref or lino not see it. Unbelievable.

The ref was an absolute disgrace all afternoon.

How can he not book their player early on with the worst foul of the game. It felt like he was giving them everything.

Completely different game and potentially scoreline if we get the first pen. Potentially lost 6 points in the last 3 games just from inept officials. Best league in the world. Really....


With utterly sh!t not up to standard officiating teams for the most part

# 31
BurnleyFC
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: Barnes

Postby BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:38 pm

TVC15 wrote:You really don’t like Burnley much do you ?
Blatant penalty.

Why do you think it wasn’t given then ?
Goalkeeper caught Barnes as he took ball past him. Unless you think the keeper did not touch Barnes ?

Yes, I really don’t like Burnley at all :roll:

I thought Barnes was looking for it and didn’t need to go down. Have you seen the replays? Fair enough if you think otherwise.

# 32
Devils_Advocate
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 882 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Devils_Advocate » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:39 pm

Thought it was a definite pen but the way Barnes deliberately moved his foot to ensure he caught the keeper had similarities to the Pope against Man City and the Glen Murray (not so much so)pens that a fair few on here were outraged at them being given as pens against us

# 33
Hibsclaret
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 241 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Hibsclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:49 pm

Was nothing like the Bernardo Silva one if that’s what you mean.

Either way they get given against us and not for us. Never mind they even up over the season. Bs

# 34
Lord Beamish
Posts: 3510
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 2394 times
Has Liked: 1392 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:52 pm

Guller Bull wrote:Wasn't the yellow for Barnes berating the lino?

No. The card comes before that.

# 35
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:53 pm

Every single report on the game ive read and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious
Last edited by THEWELLERNUT70 on Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

# 36
Devils_Advocate
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 882 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Devils_Advocate » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:55 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Every single report on the game and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious

Apart from the OP who was obviously on the wind up (very successfully) who on this thread has said it wasnt a penalty?

# 37
Guller Bull
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 146 times
Has Liked: 140 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Guller Bull » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:55 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:No. The card comes before that.


Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.

# 38
Lord Beamish
Posts: 3510
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 2394 times
Has Liked: 1392 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm

Guller Bull wrote:Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.

You can’t appeal a yellow. The utterly abysmal Ref has got away scot free.
This user liked this post: claret wizard

# 39
BurnleyFC
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: Barnes

Postby BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Every single report on the game and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious

Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.
Last edited by BurnleyFC on Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

# 40
FactualFrank
Posts: 13095
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3459 times
Has Liked: 6099 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Postby FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:57 pm

Guller Bull wrote:Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.


Not sure yellow cards can be appealed.

# 41
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:57 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Apart from the OP who was obviously on the wind up (very successfully) who on this thread has said it wasnt a penalty?


"A couple on here" ;)

# 42
FactualFrank
Posts: 13095
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3459 times
Has Liked: 6099 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes

Postby FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.


BBC Reporter thought it was. I forget her name - the fit one. She said it was a penalty and 1-1 was about right.

# 43
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image


Oh right that's where you got your viewpoint from. I get you now :D

# 44
BurnleyFC
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: Barnes

Postby BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:00 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Oh right that's where you got your viewpoint from. I get you now :D

Not quite.

I was on the game. My lad was on the pitch at half time.

Is it really that strange to want to get an opinion from journalists that have access to replays?
Last edited by BurnleyFC on Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

# 45
taio
Posts: 4349
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 1248 times
Has Liked: 119 times

Re: Barnes

Postby taio » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:00 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.


You're talking absolute shite. Stone wall penalty. Clueless if you think otherwise.

# 46
Lord Beamish
Posts: 3510
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 2394 times
Has Liked: 1392 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:02 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Image
Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.

The card came out before the tantrum. I seriously thought Barnes was going to talk himself into a red.

# 47
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 431 times
Has Liked: 1059 times

Re: Barnes

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:04 pm


# 48
Devils_Advocate
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 882 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Barnes

Postby Devils_Advocate » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:05 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:The card came out before the tantrum. I seriously thought Barnes was going to talk himself into a red.

Yep it was definitely coming out before but when someone gets booked for a foul or diving they can get away with a fair bit of dissent without getting the red. Means if youre getting booked anyway you might as well have a good old shout and moan about it

# 49
BurnleyFC
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: Barnes

Postby BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:08 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:https://www.facebook.com/958996040804013/posts/2005304676173139/

That clip is sped up. Looks like something out of a Benny Hill sketch.

# 50
duncandisorderly
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 552 times
Has Liked: 136 times

Re: Barnes

Postby duncandisorderly » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:09 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:https://www.facebook.com/958996040804013/posts/2005304676173139/


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Penalty all day long, whether it's 1819, 1919 or 2019! It's so silly we didn't get a penalty for that. It might still have ended up one all, but crikey!
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70


Return to “The Bee Hole End”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Goobs, IndigoLake, Jel, nil_desperandum, randomclaret2, Siddo, summitclaret, Tall Paul and 70 guests