Barnes

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:09 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:https://www.facebook.com/95899604080401 ... 676173139/

I hope that FB page is better than the ClaretTurf one. That really did put Burnley FC to shame.

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:10 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:That clip is sped up. Looks like something out of a Benny Hill sketch.

Keep digging

duncandisorderly · Post by **duncandisorderly** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:11 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:That clip is sped up. Looks like something out of a Benny Hill sketch.

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:11 pm

FactualFrank wrote:I hope that FB page is better than the ClaretTurf one. That really did put Burnley FC to shame.

I came off that months ago. Utter rubbish run by idiots

BurnleyFC · Post by **BurnleyFC** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:16 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Keep digging

Digging for what? It’s sped up without doubt.

TVC15 · Post by **TVC15** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:17 pm

https://twitter.com/ldnlongside/status/ ... 46789?s=01" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

How anyone debate whether this is a penalty or not is really beyond me.
The ref and linesman are an absolute f’in disgrace.

Tricky Trevor · Post by **Tricky Trevor** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:21 pm

50/50 call to a ref. Gallagher on Monday will say no pen cos he effing hates us.
Absolutely NOT a dive.

I thought it probably was but I had me Claret specs on.

EarbyClaret · Post by **EarbyClaret** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:24 pm

Thought it was a penalty.

Credit to Barnes though he sets-up Wood with a for a good chance, forces a point-blank save from McCarthy - maybe could have done better with that. Hits the bar with a very good effort and then the penalty. We haven't had one for nearly two seasons. It's a relegation six-pointer - last kick of the game and after all that's gone on in the previous 93 minutes he's the calmest man in the stadium and slots it away comfortably.

Have a feeling we'll be looking back on this as a pivotal moment in our season.

Tinribs · Post by **Tinribs** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:34 pm

Oh yeh the local fisherman is here again with his usual bullsh1t headline for a “prank” tee hee
Comedy gold

beddie · Post by **beddie** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:35 pm

I haven't seen the replay yet but I thought Barnes was superb today, especially keeping his head after being booked.

Hibsclaret · Post by **Hibsclaret** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:41 pm

beddie wrote:I haven't seen the replay yet but I thought Barnes was superb today, especially keeping his head after being booked.

And yet Jeremy Corbyn thinks he’s worth a 6 on the player ratings

diamondpocket · Post by **diamondpocket** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:42 pm

doesnt matter how soft it looks, there was contact, the ball had gone away and the keeper came flying in.
In modern day football that is a penalty even if Barnes was anticipating and looking for the contact.
Tuesday against Man U was the same; soft as hell, a little tug and Lingaard was down, PEN.

Lord Beamish · Post by **Lord Beamish** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:44 pm

Hibsclaret wrote:And yet Jeremy Corbyn thinks he’s worth a 6 on the player ratings

Jeremy Corbin??

Dark Cloud · Post by **Dark Cloud** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:52 pm

I think it was a pen. I've only seen it once, in real time at the match, but I had a really good view. Barnes is looking for/expecting the contact, so is all set to go down. When it comes, it's much softer than he anticipates so he looks to go down more theatrically than needed. BUT all players do that these days and it's still a pen!

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:54 pm

Hibsclaret wrote:And yet Jeremy Corbyn thinks he’s worth a 6 on the player ratings

Austria will – like all other European countries – suffer from the economic consequences of Brexit.

martin_p · Post by **martin_p** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:59 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Thought it was a definite pen but the way Barnes deliberately moved his foot to ensure he caught the keeper had similarities to the Pope against Man City and the Glen Murray (not so much so)pens that a fair few on here were outraged at them being given as pens against us

He’d have had to move his foot backwards not to be caught by the keeper.

Nonayforever · Post by **Nonayforever** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:59 pm

Oshkoshclaret wrote:I want some of the drugs the OP is on

He's not on drugs, he just doesn't wear his specs.

scouseclaret · Post by **scouseclaret** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:38 pm

TVC15 wrote:https://twitter.com/ldnlongside/status/ ... 46789?s=01

How anyone debate whether this is a penalty or not is really beyond me.
The ref and linesman are an absolute f’in disgrace.

That’s the thing. It’s not just the ref. Two officials have a clear unobstructed view of the incident, and yet they still get it incredibly wrong. When you compare that to the Lingard thing the other day, it really makes you wonder about the integrity of the game.

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:49 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Thought it was a definite pen but the way Barnes deliberately moved his foot to ensure he caught the keeper had similarities to the Pope against Man City and the Glen Murray (not so much so)pens that a fair few on here were outraged at them being given as pens against us

Precisely.

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:49 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

At least he did that with a cool penalty.

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:06 pm

https://www.facebook.com/10001017613824 ... 203383577/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Never a pen though according to some

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:14 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Digging for what? It’s sped up without doubt.

So being sped up means the footage is some how made up, as if its been cropped and edited?

I'm genuinely intrigued

CombatClaret · Post by **CombatClaret** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:15 pm

606 Savage (admittedly a c0ckwomble)

"The most stonewall penalty you've ever seen"

Lancasterclaret · Post by **Lancasterclaret** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:18 pm

Thought he was excellent today, if only for not chinning the ref after that terrible decision.

dsr · Post by **dsr** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:43 pm

I thought it was a penalty at first - and having seen it on the replay, I can't believe how much of a penalty. OK, there's a school of thought that says there are far too many penalties given in the Premier League and in football worldwide, because nowadays it seems that the slightest touch counts as a foul. Maybe if Anthony Taylor had been reffing on Tuesday, we would have won the game and Lingard would have been booked for diving. Teah, right.

Whether it should be a penalty or not - and it should - there is no doubt that every other team in this league would get a penalty if a goalkeeper or any other player lies down in front of the forward to get in his way. There is no suggestion at all that the forward is at fault, to the extent of being booked, because he didn't jump out of the way of the leg that was impeding him. Maybe the rule should be changed, who knows? But it's not Taylor's job to change it.

BurnleyFC · Post by **BurnleyFC** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:50 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:I'm genuinely intrigued

It doesn’t take much...

Taffy on the wing · Post by **Taffy on the wing** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:52 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.

It was a ******* penalty!

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:03 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:It doesn’t take much...

Another complete belm added to the list. Div

dsr · Post by **dsr** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:04 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.

Is it because you think that McCarthy had stopped there? He didn't. He was sliding away from goal, towards Barnes, and he kept on sliding.

There's a school of thought that says that if (as a defender) the forward pushes the ball past you, but your momentum takes you forward so you are in between the ball and the player, then it is entirely the forward's responsibility to jump out of your way; and the referee should not give a penalty if you run into him and fall over. Nobody in football (apart from Anthony Taylor) believes that. Have you seen any Premier League penalties this season? Before today, there have been 66. And I bet a good half of them have been for relatively light taps on the ankle or lower leg where the player has made no attempt to stay on his feet; and some of them have been referred to the Diving Committee which has confirmed that it isn't the forward's responsibility to dodge if the defender is in his way. Zaha? Salah? Have you seen any of their many penalties?

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:28 pm

quote="BurnleyFC"]It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.[/quote]

So we can establish that

A/ they were on the Turf
B/ they've seen a camera angle (bareing in mind the Premier league holds the rights for distribution world wide, so essentially its the same cameras in use regardles)
So where did that magical mythical camerawork come from?

I'm smelling
What is it?
Old Spice?
Brut?

Nah it's Bullsh!t

Burnleyareback2 · Post by **Burnleyareback2** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:40 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

I can’t be ar**d to read through this whole post to see when you admit you are wrong again.

Dyched · Post by **Dyched** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:46 pm

Clear penalty.

As for Barnes. What a disgraceful way to act. Appalling behaviour.

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:49 pm

Burnleyareback2 wrote:I can’t be ar**d to read through this whole post to see when you admit you are wrong again.

Just watched it on motd. And its a lot clearer now to be fair.

Definitely going down before the keeper touched him.

Thay aside he had a great game.

martin_p · Post by **martin_p** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:54 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Just watched it on motd. And its a lot clearer now to be fair.

Definitely going down before the keeper touched him.

Thay aside he had a great game.

I genuinely don’t know what sort of kick you get out of this. It’s bizarre!

Bordeauxclaret · Post by **Bordeauxclaret** » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:57 pm

It’s alnost like him and Tim know each other and live to be controversial.

Rick_Muller · Post by **Rick_Muller** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:11 am

He’s got sand in his fanny

evensteadiereddie · Post by **evensteadiereddie** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:21 am

I'm still unsure whether today's ref and "assistants" were merely incompetent or corrupt.

CBT · Post by **CBT** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:28 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Just watched it on motd. And its a lot clearer now to be fair.

Definitely going down before the keeper touched him.

Thay aside he had a great game.

U crazy just absolute crazy

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 2:04 am

anyone that thinks that wasn't a pen needs to take up knitting and do something else when the footy is on

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 2:07 am

BurnleyFC wrote:It doesn’t take much...

Still not a penalty you utter utter tool. Even the footage you proport to be speeded up, is in fact having watched it back on MOTD,is real time

A complete prat with nothing to offer to this forum, I bid you farewell

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 2:16 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Just watched it on motd. And its a lot clearer now to be fair.

Definitely going down before the keeper touched him.

Thay aside he had a great game.

And the comments from the studio panel were?

Another one for the tool list

Spiral · Post by **Spiral** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 2:36 am

cricket had a kid a bit ago and he made everyone aware of it (it was a bloody adorable affair, to be fair - congratulations and all that, CFC!) and now his missus is preoccupied with raising a child and (understandably) ignoring him so he's scrambling for the attention of his internet friends because he's feeling lonely.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 5:28 am

motm by a mile

AndyClaret · Post by **AndyClaret** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 6:55 am

Having seen it back, it's the kind of pen a salah or Aguero gets, but we don't, Barnes left his leg trailing behind him. I would have been fuming if it was given against us.

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:12 am

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:And the comments from the studio panel were?

Another one for the tool list

Oh. So Shearer and co are right... when it suits us!

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:13 am

Spiral wrote:cricket had a kid a bit ago and he made everyone aware of it (it was a bloody adorable affair, to be fair - congratulations and all that, CFC!) and now his missus is preoccupied with raising a child and (understandably) ignoring him so he's scrambling for the attention of his internet friends because he's feeling lonely.

almost...
Its a joint effort. But she gets plenty of sleep. And im on gardening leave until tomorrow so a bit of extra time

Steve-Harpers-perm · Post by **Steve-Harpers-perm** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:24 am

You are nearly as strange as Hibsclaret is over Taylor.

blake's wand · Post by **blake's wand** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:36 am

Expect it to be given, but Barnes was 100% playing for the contact and left leg trailing before he was brought down.

BurnleyFC · Post by **BurnleyFC** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:45 am

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Still not a penalty you utter utter tool. Even the footage you proport to be speeded up, is in fact having watched it back on MOTD,is real time

A complete prat with nothing to offer to this forum, I bid you farewell

You strange little man.

pureclaret · Post by **pureclaret** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:56 am

Match of the day proves it was a penalty the pundits said so as well, I agree it would have been soft but keeper does not get or touch the ball and contact is made so has to be penalty.
Would not like it against us but then did not like the ones that tarks gave away or the lingard collapse after slight touch by Hendrick, but all given.