A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
# 1
Lord Beamish
Posts: 3880
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 2623 times
Has Liked: 1668 times

A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:03 pm

Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?

# 2
FactualFrank
Posts: 14305
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3836 times
Has Liked: 6755 times
Location: Leeds

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby FactualFrank » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:05 pm

Absolutely it could.
This user liked this post: ElectroClaret

# 3
taio
Posts: 4625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 1362 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby taio » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:05 pm

No.

# 4
Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 122 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Granny WeatherWax » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:06 pm

No. I just think it was a case of the ref being completely incompetent
These 8 users liked this post: turfytopper SussexDon1inIreland LeuvenClaret evensteadiereddie longsidepies IndigoLake Silkyskills1 IanMcL

# 5
Lowbankclaret
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 314 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Lowbankclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:14 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:No. I just think it was a case of the ref being completely incompetent


Or being bought off
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

# 6
Lancasterclaret
Posts: 14185
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 4674 times
Has Liked: 2599 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Lancasterclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:14 pm

To be honest, the linesman has got to be giving that, even if the ref does not.
These 4 users liked this post: summitclaret scouseclaret RalphCoatesComb evensteadiereddie

# 7
Goody1975
Posts: 1273
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 446 times
Has Liked: 120 times
Location: Burnley

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Goody1975 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:14 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?


No, unless by giving a ridiculously inept decision he has a warped twisted agenda.

He is a referee and most of them haven't kissed a girl yet, a very strange bunch.

# 8
mdd2
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 959 times
Has Liked: 408 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby mdd2 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:16 pm

If he was booked for simulation then he has msed a right mess of the yellow card. The way Barnes went to the Lino was enough IMO to get a yellow

# 9
Claret
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 236 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:18 pm

I thought he got the yellow for being an argumentative in your face no respect for officials mr angry.

# 10
Rileybobs
Posts: 5204
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 2233 times
Has Liked: 542 times
Location: Leeds

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Rileybobs » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:19 pm

Claret wrote:I thought he got the yellow for being an argumentative in your face no respect for officials mr angry.


Obviously not or the referee wouldn't have blown up and stopped play when the ball was in play.

# 11
agreenwood
Posts: 933
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 439 times
Has Liked: 80 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby agreenwood » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:21 pm

Could be, but that’s not a ref’s job.

It was a penalty and a booking for McCarthy.

# 12
Stproc
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 72 times
Has Liked: 133 times
Location: Ribble Valley
Contact:

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Stproc » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:21 pm

NO

# 13
martin_p
Posts: 3482
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 1301 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby martin_p » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:24 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?


No, because it just strengthens Dyche case. Barnes just fell over when his foot was taken by the goalie, Dyche argued today that had he gone down more dramatically, thrown his arms in the air and rolled over a few times, he might have got the pen.

# 14
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 15180
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 5884 times
Has Liked: 8487 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby cricketfieldclarets » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:27 pm

Talk about conspiracies. It wasnt even a pen.

# 15
Tall Paul
Posts: 4496
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 1599 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Tall Paul » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:39 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?


No, and it's bows, like on a ship.

# 16
beddie
Posts: 1560
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 360 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby beddie » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:05 pm

I imagine Taylor having blown his whistle looked across at the inept Liner and said "Penalty, yes or no" . The Liner says no, dive by Barnes.

# 17
Somethingfishy
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 199 times
Has Liked: 119 times
Location: Padiham

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Somethingfishy » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:10 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:To be honest, the linesman has got to be giving that, even if the ref does not.


I genuinely think it was the linesman that told the referee not to give it. Taylor was walking towards the spot and looking over to the lino..obviously he told him on the mic he thought Barnes had dived. That is how i saw it anyway. Still not sure if the booking is for diving or dissent. I think diving as the card came out before Barnes started mouthing off. He quite clearly told the linesman to f*** *** too.
This user liked this post: chorleyhere

# 18
Lord Beamish
Posts: 3880
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 2623 times
Has Liked: 1668 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:43 pm

Tall Paul wrote:No, and it's bows, like on a ship.

Indeed. Brain fart from me.

# 19
Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 2617
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 304 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:43 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?


Two supposed professionals making a decision like that. But the next Manchester Derby he’ll be in charge with Tyler and co rubbing themselves over how he’s the strongest ref in league...

# 20
Rileybobs
Posts: 5204
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 2233 times
Has Liked: 542 times
Location: Leeds

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Rileybobs » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:04 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:I genuinely think it was the linesman that told the referee not to give it. Taylor was walking towards the spot and looking over to the lino..obviously he told him on the mic he thought Barnes had dived. That is how i saw it anyway. Still not sure if the booking is for diving or dissent. I think diving as the card came out before Barnes started mouthing off. He quite clearly told the linesman to f*** *** too.


The booking was definitely for simulation and not dissent as the referee stopped play and awarded Soton a free kick.

# 21
Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 5079
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 1593 times
Has Liked: 803 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Bordeauxclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:07 pm

Mentioned on another thread. If you cannot see that’s a foul you should not be involved in football at any level.

Perhaps controversy makes them more appealing when they retire and that’s what they have an eye on?
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1

# 22
Longsider
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 230 times
Has Liked: 362 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Longsider » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:26 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?

No . Rub on.

# 23
turfytopper
Posts: 895
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:19 am
Been Liked: 305 times
Has Liked: 2581 times
Location: Crawley West Sussex

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby turfytopper » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:46 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:To be honest, the linesman has got to be giving that, even if the ref does not.

You'd like to think so...but whether the assistant gets involved in a decision such as the one we saw today can be complicated by a number of things.

Every referee holds a meeting before the game and he gives his 'referees instructions'. This describes to the assistant his authority.. it is pretty standard for the instruction to be, 'you referee up to the penalty box and the same distance up to the half way line and approx 10 years inside the other half'. That would be the Lino's 'area of credibility'.....
In an instance of a penalty appeal it is again pretty standard for the refs to say 3 things can happen 1) he (the ref) turns it down 2) the ref gives it , lino may need to confirm in our out of the penalty box 3) the referee may think the lino may have a better view.... He would tell the assistant he'd be 'burning a hole through his head' honestly they use this term to say they are asking for the opinion of the lino.

Today Taylor has the perfect view to get it right... He instantly turned it down. So I wouldn't blame the linesman... The ref was awful.

# 24
bobinho
Posts: 3906
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 1617 times
Has Liked: 2336 times
Location: Burnley

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby bobinho » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:51 pm

agreenwood wrote:Could be, but that’s not a ref’s job.

It was a penalty and a booking for McCarthy.


I disagree. It was a penalty and a red card for McCarthy. The ref absolutely bottled it.
These 2 users liked this post: Rick_Muller chorleyhere

# 25
Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 5079
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 1593 times
Has Liked: 803 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Bordeauxclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:53 pm

bobinho wrote:I disagree. It was a penalty and a red card for McCarthy. The ref absolutely bottled it.


I don’t think it’s s red now if it’s a pen.
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46

# 26
Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 2617
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 304 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:01 pm

bobinho wrote:I disagree. It was a penalty and a red card for McCarthy. The ref absolutely bottled it.


Exactly! Not just a penalty they should have been down to ten men.

# 27
quoonbeatz
Posts: 2614
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 1455 times
Has Liked: 558 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby quoonbeatz » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:05 pm

given the amount of time he took to give the decision either way, i'm pretty sure the linesman told him it was a dive.

not that he should have needed any help, as it was the clearest foul you'll ever see. the keeper's reaction said it all, he didn't appeal. if he'd thought barnes had dived he'd have gone nuts at him.

# 28
dsr
Posts: 7412
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 2241 times
Has Liked: 1003 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby dsr » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:06 pm

bobinho wrote:I disagree. It was a penalty and a red card for McCarthy. The ref absolutely bottled it.

Only a red card if you think it was a deliberate attempt to trip him, but yellow if you think it was an incompetent attempt to get to the ball first. He went for the ball and was late - yellow card.
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46

# 29
Vintage Claret
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 309 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Vintage Claret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:25 pm

Whether the official thinks it was a foul or not how in God's name can he see that as a dive/simulation from Barnes?

The keeper was a foot away from Barnes as he slid out for the ball, what is Barnes supposed to do in that situation other than fall over the keeper?

That happens at Old Trafford, The Emirates, The Etihad, etc it"s a penalty for the home team everytime.

Ironic that it's one of the crappiest refs in the PL that actually awards us our first penalty for 60 odd games or whatever it is, but I guess even he would struggle to explain not given that one.

# 30
SalisburyClaret
Posts: 1135
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 310 times
Has Liked: 153 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby SalisburyClaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:34 pm

If the ref thought it was a dive then it’s a yellow. The dissent is certainly a yellow. Barnes should have been sent off - but the ref couldn’t even get his mistakes right
This user liked this post: CnBtruntru

# 31
dsr
Posts: 7412
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 2241 times
Has Liked: 1003 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby dsr » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:44 pm

SalisburyClaret wrote:If the ref thought it was a dive then it’s a yellow. The dissent is certainly a yellow. Barnes should have been sent off - but the ref couldn’t even get his mistakes right

I think it was established a year or two back, that if a player commits a yellow card offence, and then commits another before the ref shows him the first yellow card, then he won't be sent off for two yellows. The theory goes that until the first yellow card is shown, he doesn't know that he has been booked so doesn't have the chance to change his behaviour.

# 32
martin_p
Posts: 3482
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 1301 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby martin_p » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:47 pm

Unsurprisingly the pundits on MOTD think it was a terrible decision. If Taylor has anything about him he’ll ring Barnes and apologise for accusing him of cheating.

# 33
SalisburyClaret
Posts: 1135
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 310 times
Has Liked: 153 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby SalisburyClaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:50 pm

dsr wrote:I think it was established a year or two back, that if a player commits a yellow card offence, and then commits another before the ref shows him the first yellow card, then he won't be sent off for two yellows. The theory goes that until the first yellow card is shown, he doesn't know that he has been booked so doesn't have the chance to change his behaviour.


Makes sense DSR - I stand corrected

# 34
Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 5079
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 1593 times
Has Liked: 803 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Bordeauxclaret » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:50 pm

Watching it back on the big screen makes it even more unbelievable.
I just don’t know, somethings not right there.
You see some where you think, well maybe an element of doubt so that’s why it’s not given, with that there is nothing.

# 35
thatdberight
Posts: 1847
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby thatdberight » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:52 pm

dsr wrote:I think it was established a year or two back, that if a player commits a yellow card offence, and then commits another before the ref shows him the first yellow card, then he won't be sent off for two yellows. The theory goes that until the first yellow card is shown, he doesn't know that he has been booked so doesn't have the chance to change his behaviour.


The only high profile case I remember was ex-Claret Chris Baird. IFAB confirmed then (late 2015) that it was absolutely right to show two yellow cards from the same phase of play if need be. Was there something later?

It was a terrible decision not to give a penalty. It was a terrible decision to book Barnes for diving. It was a terrible decision not to send Barnes off.
Last edited by thatdberight on Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

# 36
RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 3537
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 1144 times
Has Liked: 1186 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby RalphCoatesComb » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:54 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Could the decision to book Barnes be a shot across Burnley and Sean Dyche’s boughs from a Referee fed up of listening to Dyche’s outspoken attitude towards Refs being conned by simulation?


Absolutely!

On MOTD Taylor has been shown to be completely incompetent. The linesman even worse as he was closer. 17,000 fans all shouted PENALTY. The only person in the ground who thought it wasn't was Anthony Taylor. The lino just bottled it.

Had that been Citeh, Liverpool or United, it would have been a Penalty and a sending off for the keeper!

Total incompetence! And even Shearer agrees :lol:

# 37
RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 3537
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 1144 times
Has Liked: 1186 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby RalphCoatesComb » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:00 am

martin_p wrote:If Taylor has anything about him he’ll ring Barnes and apologise for accusing him of cheating.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Not going to happen, but Taylor should be reffing Forest Green Rovers v Notts County next weekend... again, not going to happen!

Does Anthony Taylor feel embarrassed this evening for being too slow to keep up with play? You guessed. No he doesn't! Tosser!!! :x :x :x

# 38
dsr
Posts: 7412
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 2241 times
Has Liked: 1003 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby dsr » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:03 am

What's even more amazing is not only that neither ref nor linesman were confident it was a penalty, but that one of them was confident that Barnes wasn't touched and dived on purpose, and the other (at best) didn't know whether Barnes had been touched or not. If they didn't see a foul, they would just have waved play on unless, between them, they were confident is was a clear dive.
This user liked this post: Siddo

# 39
evensteadiereddie
Posts: 4380
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 1304 times
Has Liked: 4031 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby evensteadiereddie » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:39 am

A complete fiasco - either through sheer incompetence or corruption.
Incompetence I can - just about - accept, corruption is just plain wrong. I'm beginning to think we're having far too many decisions go against us.
Dychio is right: there comes a point when you have to say "Enough is enough".................those in ahem, authority, need to get this sorted quickly.

# 40
The Enclosure
Posts: 2062
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 543 times
Has Liked: 1920 times
Location: Burnley

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby The Enclosure » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:52 am

The reaction of all the other players and the crowd tells you it was a stone wall penalty.
We have had some poor refs this season but he was the worst,not just for the pen decision.
Last edited by The Enclosure on Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

# 41
Dazzler
Posts: 3748
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:10 am
Been Liked: 759 times
Has Liked: 2009 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Dazzler » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:56 am

Has anyone give it a thought that if it was any other player than Barnes it probably would have been given?

# 42
Squarepusher
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 108 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Squarepusher » Sun Feb 03, 2019 1:54 am

Dazzler wrote:Has anyone give it a thought that if it was any other player than Barnes it probably would have been given?


Yes. Doesn't make the decision any less wrong, but I think it's entirely possible that Ashley's reputation has preceded him here.

# 43
AlargeClaret
Posts: 1094
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 364 times
Has Liked: 29 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby AlargeClaret » Sun Feb 03, 2019 4:26 am

No conspiracy theory ( do people seriously ,even the loons in here believe that ) it was a stonewall pen though Barnes reputation possibly swung it . The keeper knows exactly what to do puts both legs out to clash with Barnes left leg while going for the ball , maybe 1 in 7 times keeper blags it . The ref likelybgave yelliw for diving but he could easily have been sent off as he told the Lino to feck off

# 44
Vegas Claret
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 4022 times
Has Liked: 1822 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Vegas Claret » Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:15 am

nothing other than a shite decision which I'm sure he will be embarrassed about

# 45
Siddo
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 242 times
Has Liked: 1460 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby Siddo » Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:59 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Talk about conspiracies. It wasnt even a pen.

Your fishing attempts and efforts to be contrary are getting very boring.
These 2 users liked this post: IndigoLake randomclaret2

# 46
martin_p
Posts: 3482
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 1301 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby martin_p » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:08 am

AlargeClaret wrote:No conspiracy theory ( do people seriously ,even the loons in here believe that ) it was a stonewall pen though Barnes reputation possibly swung it . The keeper knows exactly what to do puts both legs out to clash with Barnes left leg while going for the ball , maybe 1 in 7 times keeper blags it . The ref likelybgave yelliw for diving but he could easily have been sent off as he told the Lino to feck off


I think the fact he didn’t get a second yellow for swearing at the linesman shows that even in the seconds after the decision Taylor already knows he’s got it horribly wrong.
This user liked this post: IndigoLake

# 47
duncandisorderly
Posts: 1499
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 619 times
Has Liked: 150 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby duncandisorderly » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:21 am

What 'reputation'? He has a bit of rep on here for winning free kicks, but he's hardly a world renowned chronic diver who is forever winning penalties at the slightest touch.

# 48
ClaretTony
Posts: 26645
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 12164 times
Has Liked: 2339 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby ClaretTony » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:28 am

beddie wrote:I imagine Taylor having blown his whistle looked across at the inept Liner and said "Penalty, yes or no" . The Liner says no, dive by Barnes.


Doubt it, watch the liner, he's carrying on thinking nothing has happened and moves to the corner flag.

# 49
duncandisorderly
Posts: 1499
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 619 times
Has Liked: 150 times

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby duncandisorderly » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:37 am

The only only only thing I can possibly think why the ref thinks its a dive is the odd little stutter before he gets taken out as he adjusts his feet to poke the ball past him. It possibly looks unnatural from the refs POV. Possibly. Maybe.

# 50
SussexDon1inIreland
Posts: 2852
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 753 times
Has Liked: 5808 times
Location: Greystones Ireland

Re: A Different Angle On The Non-Penalty.

Postby SussexDon1inIreland » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:39 am

We have been robbed of 6 points and may go down because of it

Shocking

Travesty

UTC


Return to “The Bee Hole End”