martin_p wrote:As long as you continue to misunderstand the uses of the word evidence you'll continue to get this wrong and continue to look a fool. I even tried helping you by posting some dictionary examples of how to use 'evidence', please read them.
It's not me looking a fool marty! I'm not the one waiting for time travel to be invented. In order to have any hope of proving me wrong and showing it is actually possible to provide evidence either for or of a future event before its even happened!
You've previously claimed you had evidence that ending free movement of people would not help to prevent people trafficking, exploitation and modern day slavery.
You failed to provide it.
You claimed that the ECHR was part of the EU and even had to be made aware that Russia was a signatory to it!
You claimed that John Bercow could not unilaterally choose what parliament can vote on. He did.
And you've claimed that , what could turn out to be short term or reversible, business decisions, as EVIDENCE that brexit WILL have a negative impact on the uk.
As we know you can't provide evidence for or from an event that has not happened yet. Only a prediction, belief or opinion.
Marty, you've single handedly proven that if you were to get in the lift of a high rise building.
You'd be wrong on so many levels........