Lancasterclaret wrote:Colburn
You haven't said anything on here that you haven't said before. You haven't said anything on here that is new for two years on Brexit.
In that time, thousands of academics, business leaders, trade experts, journalists have written realms of columns about Brexit. But you've not read any of them unless they include the words "remainer conspiracy, Brexit means Brexit, Its all the fault of the EU etc etc etc.
Its painfully obvious that you don't have a scooby doo what you are talking about
But keep posting away in reply to me. It just highlights even more that you don't.
And "common sense and logic" needs facts, evidence and a bit of knowledge about what you are talking about to be acted on, so whatever you are using, its certainly not "common sense and logic"
I wouldn't mind half as much to be honest if you were like Ringo and Jakub, who just don't like immigration and link the problems in East Lancs to the EU. They are obviously wrong, but at least they are not pretending about why they voted Brexit.
I'm sorry but you're getting more and more feeble.
You still aren't quoting me in your replies, so that other people can see how clever you are, but hoping I don't see it and respond.
I'll ask again. You claim that Brexit is damaging for us, no problem with that, but I've pointed out several times, why it is more damaging to the rest of Europe.
I gave half a dozen reasons to you and nil d, neither of you have yet said I'm wrong, more specifically why I'm wrong. What have I missed in my post that you can see, but don't want to tell me and the rest of the world.
You either agree or disagree, but if you disagree then tell me why, because unless you do your hissy fitting is just vacuous.
It's my ball and I'm going home.....
As for your claim I don't read about Brexit, your right, I don't. I know why I voted leave, I don't need any academic, journalist or politician telling me what I see, and what I believe.
There are academics, journalists and politicians on both sides of the argument, they can't all be right, so why should I listen to one side over another. I think for myself.
Common sense and logic don't always require evidence.
When you have so many AJPs justifying opposite points of view the only thing we have to separate the wheat from the chaff is common sense and logic.