CrosspoolClarets wrote:On my daily skim up this thread I see we have regressed to the debate about Brexit Party = Racist. I thought we had moved on from Jon Snow’s comment “I have never seen so many white people all in one place” about a Brexit party march, despite the BP having loads of ethnic minority candidates.

I’m too dim to know how to attach it on here, but Jon could want to study carefully the photo that Ursula Von Der Leyen has tweeted of her and her 27 all-white commissioners, which looks very similar to Junckers and his earlier photos of the last batch of 28 all-white commissioners. The big group of MEPs doesn’t have many either, and the few that there are, most are British. No person of colour has ever held high office in the EU.

They have even had the nerve to give their top migration official the title “Protecting the European way of life”. By which of course they mean white European.

The Brexit Party in particular, and Brexit voters in general, have called time on our place in this dodgy cabal, while remaining happy to have limited migration where it benefits us. Please don’t imply we are the racist ones. Perhaps look closer to home - the Lib Dem’s had to rely on Chukka defecting to get their first person of colour in the chamber, the SNP have none out of 35. Yet they have the nerve to falsely accuse the Tories of right wing behaviour. Rank hypocrisy.

martin_p wrote:It would help if a confirmed Brexit Party supporter didn’t take the line that all Poles are bad because one stole his fish! But for clarity, the accusation was against him not the whole Brexit Party.

Spijed wrote:What does Boris do next?

Is he likely to win or lose?

https://capx.co/what-is-boris-johnsons-next-move/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

taio wrote:To he fair the two posts you've quoted are absolutely correct and are at the heart of the problem.

quoonbeatz wrote:They aren't correct which is what makes them the heart of the problem.

The first quoted post is a lie which makes the second quote... a lie.

AndrewJB wrote:Bercow reckons there are three likely outcomes: a new withdrawal agreement supported by parliament, a no-deal Brexit backed by a Commons majority, or a request by the government to Brussels for a future temporary extension of the UK’s membership of the EU.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... eal-brexit" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think Johnson's only realistic option is to back down and start over (or resign), but given the contempt he's displayed toward the spirit (if not the laws) of our system and institutions would it surprise you if he becomes more extreme?

TheFamilyCat wrote:Surely the second “likely outcome” is incredibly unlikely? How can there be a commons majority for no-deal when the majority voted to pass a bill to prevent it?

taio wrote:With the single market comes freedom of movement.

martin_p wrote:It would seem unlikely. I think we’re down to two options really, a deal getting through the commons or Johnson resigning.

Spijed wrote:He's backtracking very quickly on removing the whip. He wants the 21 MP's back on side.

martin_p wrote:I think the majority of the 21 would vote for a deal anyway. Many of them voted consistently for May’s deal and have therefore voted to leave the EU more times than the PM and some of his cabinet.

AndyClaret wrote:Britain's death rate has fallen, Lancasterclaret will be seething at this news, how dare Brexiteers not die !

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... alved.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ClaretAndJew wrote:Is this an article specifically about people who voted Brexit not dying?

AndyClaret wrote:We've had enough of experts...... oh !

https://order-order.com/2019/09/13/nort ... agreement/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ClaretAndJew wrote:Well no, he dismissed a legal challenge. It goes to the supreme court for an actual real decision.

AndyClaret wrote:I was referring to prominent remoaners James O'Brien, Femi the t-shirt, David "super injunction" Schneider and the remoaners favourite crowd funded lawyer, Jolyon Maughon being wrong about the GFA.

CrosspoolClarets wrote:On my daily skim up this thread I see we have regressed to the debate about Brexit Party = Racist. I thought we had moved on from Jon Snow’s comment “I have never seen so many white people all in one place” about a Brexit party march, despite the BP having loads of ethnic minority candidates.

I’m too dim to know how to attach it on here, but Jon could want to study carefully the photo that Ursula Von Der Leyen has tweeted of her and her 27 all-white commissioners, which looks very similar to Junckers and his earlier photos of the last batch of 28 all-white commissioners. The big group of MEPs doesn’t have many either, and the few that there are, most are British. No person of colour has ever held high office in the EU.

They have even had the nerve to give their top migration official the title “Protecting the European way of life”. By which of course they mean white European.

The Brexit Party in particular, and Brexit voters in general, have called time on our place in this dodgy cabal, while remaining happy to have limited migration where it benefits us. Please don’t imply we are the racist ones. Perhaps look closer to home - the Lib Dem’s had to rely on Chukka defecting to get their first person of colour in the chamber, the SNP have none out of 35. Yet they have the nerve to falsely accuse the Tories of right wing behaviour. Rank hypocrisy.

If it be your will wrote:I haven't factually checked any of that, but I'm assuming it to be correct. If so, that's a very illuminating post.

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Is Femi still poncing about like a massive bell end?

Greenmile wrote:Given the first sentence is a lie, it’s maybe not that wise to assume the rest is correct.

Tall Paul wrote:Crosspool's bullshit radar obviously doesn't work on his own posts.

Lowbankclaret wrote:sorry about going off on one about my passionate subject of fishing.

In new news, the Brexit Party has taken control of Hartlepool council after 7 independents joined the Brexit party and formed and alliance with the tories.

AndyClaret wrote:Britain's death rate has fallen, Lancasterclaret will be seething at this news, how dare Brexiteers not die !

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mar ... alved.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AndyClaret wrote:Leave.eu cleared by the Met of any wrong doing, another Carole Codswollop retraction/correction on the way....

https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1172502320703258626" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

tiger76 wrote:Explains why Farage was in the North East this week,that area has potential for the BP,the Tories and Lib Dems are pretty weak,and it's a heavily leave voting region.

Also it was the BP''S biggest % vote in the European Elections,Hartlepool will certainly be one of their target seats amongst others.

Lowbankclaret wrote:I think there is a big chance in Burnley to.

Julie is not very popular.

Was it 66.6% voted to leave.

I think we have a good local Brexit candidate.

Spijed wrote:I still don't see how the Brexit party can survive IF there is a deal before an election

Lowbankclaret wrote:I think there is a big chance in Burnley to.

Julie is not very popular.

Was it 66.6% voted to leave.

I think we have a good local Brexit candidate.

Lancasterclaret wrote:60.9% leave vote in Peterborough, and Lab in the middle of a huge anti-semitism crisis and had picked the last MP who tried to hide breaking the law.

Result?

Lab hold and Farage escaping through a toilet window rather than face the press.

Lowbankclaret wrote:Yes Peterborough was such a fixed result it was embarrassing.


Let’s not get into a big discussion about it as it so obviously fixed, then covered up .

Lowbankclaret wrote:Yes Peterborough was such a fixed result it was embarrassing.


Let’s not get into a big discussion about it as it so obviously fixed, then covered up .

Spijed wrote:I still don't see how the Brexit party can survive IF there is a deal before an election

Lancasterclaret wrote:Cool.

I think if you want to claim that, then we need to have a big discussion.

Where is your evidence?

Lowbankclaret wrote:Exactly, that’s the problem there is none.

But postal votes need to be banned.

AndyClaret wrote:The over 65s are more likely to have voted for Brexit.

AndyClaret wrote:The over 65s are more likely to have voted for Brexit.

AndyClaret wrote:The over 65s are more likely to have voted for Brexit.

Lowbankclaret wrote:Exactly, that’s the problem there is none.

But postal votes need to be banned.

Lancasterclaret wrote:So with no evidence at all, you think it was fixed?

One thing I will say for you Brexit supporters, you are certainly consistent in your use of "alternative facts"

CnBtruntru wrote:Undemocratic?