Motd commentary
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Motd commentary
Highlights the corner decision. Bit not the throw in.
Big club bias?
Both decisions wrong. But different view on both
Big club bias?
Both decisions wrong. But different view on both
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Motd commentary
And no view at all from lineker either.
-
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:51 pm
- Been Liked: 267 times
- Has Liked: 660 times
- Location: Starbug
Re: Motd commentary
Strange what's shown and what isn't, I wanted a second look at foythes tackle, personally thought it was a possible red.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 5158
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2103 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Motd commentary
“That corner has cost them”cricketfieldclarets wrote:And no view at all from lineker either.
“What a fantastic thrownin from Rose”
Not shown the balls we played across the box twice - the horrid tackle at edge of their box (or the Bardsley tackle on Rose).
Didn’t show defenders trying to crop or pull back McNeil....or Spurs just constantly reverting to just trying to lump it.
Can’t be having the nation thinking Burnley actually played well against one of the top 6 can we.
These 4 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland MT03ALG randomclaret2 Guich
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Motd commentary
AbsolutelyShore claret wrote:Strange what's shown and what isn't, I wanted a second look at foythes tackle, personally thought it was a possible red.
-
- Posts: 19173
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3116 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Motd commentary
Wasn't a red - he pulled out of the studs up tackle and caught him on the follow through, pulling the foot away saved. Bards however, should have had a red, straight at Rose's knee with the foot and remember Rose was up in the air, was late as wellShore claret wrote:Strange what's shown and what isn't, I wanted a second look at foythes tackle, personally thought it was a possible red.
-
- Posts: 3940
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1234 times
- Has Liked: 490 times
Re: Motd commentary
The corner is mentioned at least 4 times and the throw in is ignored. Unreal.
Apparently we have someone called Woods who had a name change during the insightful analysis of Paul Ince. He then became as wooden as the analysis
Apparently we have someone called Woods who had a name change during the insightful analysis of Paul Ince. He then became as wooden as the analysis
-
- Posts: 17776
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4045 times
- Has Liked: 1847 times
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Motd commentary
We won, fair and square. F* ck ‘em!
These 2 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland MT03ALG
Re: Motd commentary
No one likes us , we don't care !
-
- Posts: 30278
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10917 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Motd commentary
he pulled out of the challenge so it was more his knee that made contact, deffo a yellow but no moreShore claret wrote:Strange what's shown and what isn't, I wanted a second look at foythes tackle, personally thought it was a possible red.
This user liked this post: bfcmik
-
- Posts: 15108
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3139 times
- Has Liked: 6682 times
Re: Motd commentary
It's really not worth watching.
For those who can't go to the games I recommend subscribing to BFC Clarets Player, watch the whole game without the bullshit of punditry.
For those who can't go to the games I recommend subscribing to BFC Clarets Player, watch the whole game without the bullshit of punditry.
These 3 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland Bosscat MT03ALG
Re: Motd commentary
I found it strange how MOTD highlighted the corner decision and virtually ignored everything else that mattered. It's almost like they were looking for excuses for Spurs losing. To be fair Keown was very complimentary about us, Lineker just sat there like the stuffed shirt he is.
These 3 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland Wuggawumphwumph MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 605 times
- Has Liked: 309 times
Re: Motd commentary
I’ve just watched it and yes they’ve highlighted the corner that shouldn’t have been because Pochettino was having ago at the ref about it, but they’ve done nothing but praise us.
Seriously why do people think the worlds against us when they clearly aren’t?
Seriously why do people think the worlds against us when they clearly aren’t?
These 8 users liked this post: nil_desperandum Greenmile taio Top Claret evensteadiereddie simonclaret Lancasterclaret JTClaret
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Motd commentary
The world isnt against us and even at the game i didnt get too worried about their goal because we had benefitted ten minutes earlier from one we shouldnt have .Winstonswhite wrote:I’ve just watched it and yes they’ve highlighted the corner that shouldn’t have been because Pochettino was having ago at the ref about it, but they’ve done nothing but praise us.
Seriously why do people think the worlds against us when they clearly aren’t?
More the point is the inconsistency in the media. Which can go against you. If the refs of next weeks game see spurs had a dubious goal against them it will be in the mind.
The reality is the throw for their goal was a good ten or so yards ahead of where it should have been. And it should have been highlighted.
Spurs were stealing ground all day. And it was only the noise from The stands that stopped all but that one. Dean pulled them back plenty of times. Shows how important the fans are. Because had we not theyd have got away with it more.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
Re: Motd commentary
Can’t stand all this “Everyone’s against Burnley” stuff either. It’s tiresome and boring.
As for stolen yards on throw ins. Have the lino have spray and mark where the ball went out.
As for stolen yards on throw ins. Have the lino have spray and mark where the ball went out.
-
- Posts: 7301
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1823 times
- Has Liked: 3952 times
Re: Motd commentary
Spot on.Winstonswhite wrote:I’ve just watched it and yes they’ve highlighted the corner that shouldn’t have been because Pochettino was having ago at the ref about it, but they’ve done nothing but praise us.
Seriously why do people think the worlds against us when they clearly aren’t?
The entire focus of the "analysts" was to highlight how well we played, and to single out Wood, Barnes, Tarkowski and Mee for praise.
They had no option but to look at the "corner" because this was what caused Pochettino's "meltdown", but they didn't in any way suggest that it was a terrible decision that turned the game, in fact they were quite dismissive of it, and put Pochettino's reaction down to the pressure of losing a pivotal game.
These 3 users liked this post: taio evensteadiereddie simonclaret
-
- Posts: 7301
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1823 times
- Has Liked: 3952 times
Re: Motd commentary
Something we never do?cricketfieldclarets wrote: The reality is the throw for their goal was a good ten or so yards ahead of where it should have been. And it should have been highlighted.
Spurs were stealing ground all day.
When selected Lowton is one of the "best" at it.
(Not that I agree with it).
Re: Motd commentary
Like you I don't agree with it, but every team does it including us.nil_desperandum wrote:Something we never do?
When selected Lowton is one of the "best" at it.
(Not that I agree with it).
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 917 times
- Location: The Park
Re: Motd commentary
Spot on.nil_desperandum wrote:Spot on.
The entire focus of the "analysts" was to highlight how well we played, and to single out Wood, Barnes, Tarkowski and Mee for praise.
They had no option but to look at the "corner" because this was what caused Pochettino's "meltdown", but they didn't in any way suggest that it was a terrible decision that turned the game, in fact they were quite dismissive of it, and put Pochettino's reaction down to the pressure of losing a pivotal game.
The decision for the corner was an error, but it was nothing like Attwell's 'ghost goal' from a few years ago. People make mistakes. I remember being royally naffed off when Wolves scored from a corner that wasn't at Wembley back in 1988, but these things happen.
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 605 times
- Has Liked: 309 times
Re: Motd commentary
Come on mate, we’ve just beaten a top six side and you’re moaning that MOTD aren’t highlighting that a throw in was 10 yards ahead of where it should have been.cricketfieldclarets wrote:The world isnt against us and even at the game i didnt get too worried about their goal because we had benefitted ten minutes earlier from one we shouldnt have .
More the point is the inconsistency in the media. Which can go against you. If the refs of next weeks game see spurs had a dubious goal against them it will be in the mind.
The reality is the throw for their goal was a good ten or so yards ahead of where it should have been. And it should have been highlighted.
Spurs were stealing ground all day. And it was only the noise from The stands that stopped all but that one. Dean pulled them back plenty of times. Shows how important the fans are. Because had we not theyd have got away with it more.
Re: Motd commentary
I have seen that corner decision several times now and I am far from certain what the correct decision was. I think the BBC were really biased by focusing on that and ignoring the throw in. Back to the corner, it may have hit Hendrick last but if it did then Hendrick's leg was over the bye line at the time but it is impossible to know. Is there an unwritten rule of if in doubt favour the defence? If so should have been a GK.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 7301
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1823 times
- Has Liked: 3952 times
Re: Motd commentary
Who?? Are you sure you watched??Top Claret wrote:Just watched mod and it was all about Burnley. Wright and monkey man gave us nothing but praise
And which of them was "monkey man"? You need to be careful.
-
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:19 pm
- Been Liked: 385 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Motd commentary
Wright???
Monkey man???
Are you serious?
Monkey man???
Are you serious?
Re: Motd commentary
Wright wasn't on.Top Claret wrote:Just watched mod and it was all about Burnley. Wright and monkey man gave us nothing but praise
-
- Posts: 6217
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1277 times
- Has Liked: 8528 times
- Location: Greystones Ireland
Re: Motd commentary
If they had just highlighted the cheating in the throw or have not cut Sean’s interview when he brought it up then it would have been fairer
But BBC don’t do fair
Thought Ince analysis should have included they way we pressurised them for 94 minutes
UTC
But BBC don’t do fair
Thought Ince analysis should have included they way we pressurised them for 94 minutes
UTC
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
- Been Liked: 1110 times
- Has Liked: 802 times
Re: Motd commentary
Do you mean 'MOTD' ?Top Claret wrote:Just watched mod and it was all about Burnley. Wright and monkey man gave us nothing but praise
Wright wasn't on there.
Paul Ince was on there.
Who is 'monkey man' ?
Is that a reference to Martin Keown?
Personally I find that an unacceptable term to use about someone.
Other than that..great post.
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 605 times
- Has Liked: 309 times
Re: Motd commentary
Step off your high horses, he’s in about Keown who I’m sure you’ll all agree is fair game for anything you want to say about
Re: Motd commentary
I mean they didn't show Bardsley's yellow either which on another day could maybe have seen red too. I think you're overthinking it.Shore claret wrote:Strange what's shown and what isn't, I wanted a second look at foythes tackle, personally thought it was a possible red.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Motd commentary
Martin Keown; a man who looks like someone has set his face on fire and then put it out with a golf shoe.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Motd commentary
Of course it was Ince on MOTD. Hung over this morning after celebrating yesterdays marvelous victory.
Old monkey face is my nieces, brothers god father so practically family.
Well that's my excuse to be insulting
Old monkey face is my nieces, brothers god father so practically family.
Well that's my excuse to be insulting
-
- Posts: 5158
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2103 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Motd commentary
https://ketqua.videostreamlet.net/embed/6e5kL8yTBV
Crazy how other highlights make it look like we were all over them.
Crazy how other highlights make it look like we were all over them.
Re: Motd commentary
Isn't your neice's brother your nephew?Top Claret wrote:Of course it was Ince on MOTD. Hung over this morning after celebrating yesterdays marvelous victory.
Old monkey face is my nieces, brothers god father so practically family.
Well that's my excuse to be insulting
This user liked this post: whiffa
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Motd commentary
Absolutely. If you cant beat them join them. My point was that was it the other way round it would have been highlighted had we scored. Dyche was fuming at the time. Thankfuly we won.nil_desperandum wrote:Something we never do?
When selected Lowton is one of the "best" at it.
(Not that I agree with it).
Barnes did another pathetic dive yesterday. But again cant beat them join them. Doesnt mean it shouldnt be highlighted either way.
Re: Motd commentary
Two things I'd like to mention....
Foyth should have been booked early doors for pulling back one of our players.I thought that this was a mandatory booking these days.He should therefore have been sent off IMO for the 2nd offence regardless of whether it should have been red or yellow.
For the Kane goal,he should be given credit for his intelligence to get in position as he anticipated the throw-in going beyond our defenders.Tarks switched off and should have been goal side.
Foyth should have been booked early doors for pulling back one of our players.I thought that this was a mandatory booking these days.He should therefore have been sent off IMO for the 2nd offence regardless of whether it should have been red or yellow.
For the Kane goal,he should be given credit for his intelligence to get in position as he anticipated the throw-in going beyond our defenders.Tarks switched off and should have been goal side.
-
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:43 pm
- Been Liked: 249 times
- Has Liked: 49 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Motd commentary
Who cares we just walloped Spurs!!!!
-
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:21 pm
- Been Liked: 179 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
- Location: Moorway
Re: Motd commentary
It's not that "no one likes us"....Some are just bewitched, bothered and bewildered about our style...We're a team playing with two up front and although we can play some fancy sideway football if necessary, we want the ball to go forward because that's where the goal is!
-
- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2238 times
- Has Liked: 1617 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Motd commentary
The commentator actually described it as a great throw in from Rose. To be fair though I think Lineker et al didn’t do too much of a bad job discussing the game. They only highlighted the corner decision because of Pochetinos outburst I think. They credited us with some highlights and were especially full of praise for Mee. I personally thought they were okay in their analysis.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Highlights the corner decision. Bit not the throw in.
Big club bias?
Both decisions wrong. But different view on both
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Motd commentary
Nieces step brother. Life is very complicated these daysTall Paul wrote:Isn't your neice's brother your nephew?
-
- Posts: 6410
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: Motd commentary
Ince commented that he thought '...the fans were getting a bit restless...' and that '...Sean Dyche was gone at one point...'
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
- Been Liked: 892 times
- Has Liked: 1161 times
- Location: Proudsville
Re: Motd commentary
claretblue wrote:Ince commented that he thought '...the fans were getting a bit restless...' and that '...Sean Dyche was gone at one point...'
He must have looked on here just before Christmas
Re: Motd commentary
Isn't the commentary re-done after the game to highlight certain points as well?
-
- Posts: 8325
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2439 times
- Has Liked: 1979 times
Re: Motd commentary
I hate MoTD. They boil every match down to the bare minimum. It was a cracking match and ended up as about 8 incidents shown repeatedly from every possible angle plus crowd and bench shots. As has been mentioned above there were so many other talking points from this game. This was a weekend of 4 PL matches.
The Sky extended showing kicks it in the gonads.
The Sky extended showing kicks it in the gonads.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:37 pm
- Been Liked: 16 times
- Has Liked: 192 times
Re: Motd commentary
I like this idea - if the ref does it for free kicks why not?Dyched wrote:... As for stolen yards on throw ins. Have the lino have spray and mark where the ball went out.
-
- Posts: 7301
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1823 times
- Has Liked: 3952 times
Re: Motd commentary
Good idea in theory, but I guess it would prevent any quick throws and slow things down even more. But I'm not really sure it's practical in any case.CanuckClaret wrote:I like this idea - if the ref does it for free kicks why not?
Don't forget that the linesman only covers half of the touchline and even then the ball doesn't necessarily go out of play near him, and he needs to remain in position to check for offsides etc., so either the referee would have to go all the way across to the touchline each time or we would need at least 2 more officials to cover the full length of the touchline.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
- Been Liked: 892 times
- Has Liked: 1161 times
- Location: Proudsville
Re: Motd commentary
Tricky Trevor wrote:I hate MoTD. They boil every match down to the bare minimum. It was a cracking match and ended up as about 8 incidents shown repeatedly from every possible angle plus crowd and bench shots. As has been mentioned above there were so many other talking points from this game. This was a weekend of 4 PL matches.
The Sky extended showing kicks it in the gonads.
We were first on MOTD but it was only about 7 minutes of actual game footage. Seemed very quick, especially given how there wasn't many matches played on Saturday. You'd think there'd be more room to put a few more chances and incidents on.
Re: Motd commentary
They could have scrubbed the corner controversy by mentioning the one oin the first half that should have been a Burnley corner and was given as a Spurs goal kick. They could point out that Spurs should have had to defend 7 corners, they actually had to defend 7 corners, and the fact that the one they didn't defend was the one that should have been given half an hour earlier, is their problem not the ref's.
Re: Motd commentary
Spurs would have never scored if the 4th official hadn`t thrown the ball straight back to rose, when I saw it at the game, I presumed it was one of the Spurs bench who threw the ball back at breakneck speed before it had even hit the ground (Surely an illegal FA rule?}