Michael Jackson documentary
-
- Posts: 5092
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1181 times
- Has Liked: 637 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Boy you have to watch it then come back on here and say what you think .
I wanted to turn it off but somehow could not ,some parts were very painful to listen to when he said he had to be on all fours on the corner of the bed with his bum facing MJ while he whacked himself off . He said " if i looked between my legs i saw Micheal pulling himself off and if i looked in front of me their was a picture of Micheal as Peter Pan " it kind of sums it all up as how does a 7 year old take that in ?
I wanted to turn it off but somehow could not ,some parts were very painful to listen to when he said he had to be on all fours on the corner of the bed with his bum facing MJ while he whacked himself off . He said " if i looked between my legs i saw Micheal pulling himself off and if i looked in front of me their was a picture of Micheal as Peter Pan " it kind of sums it all up as how does a 7 year old take that in ?
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Why do people watch Sh!t on TV.....
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Some will say he's Fabricated it all..Tribesmen wrote:Boy you have to watch it then come back on here and say what you think .
I wanted to turn it off but somehow could not ,some parts were very painful to listen to when he said he had to be on all fours on the corner of the bed with his bum facing MJ while he whacked himself off . He said " if i looked between my legs i saw Micheal pulling himself off and if i looked in front of me their was a picture of Micheal as Peter Pan " it kind of sums it all up as how does a 7 year old take that in ?
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Open minded about a seven year old sharing the same bed as him ?Rick_Muller wrote:Please don’t misunderstand my position on this. Paedophilia is abhorrent, and I did watch the program last night. I saw excerpts of information from the past that were used to sensationalise one side of a story where we cannot corroborate what was actually stated. As I said, the other party is dead and cannot defend himself.
In reference to Jimmy Savile, since the allegations about him where first raised actual eye witnesses of him performing abhorrent actions came forward to corroborate the allegations, so that is different and cannot be used in comparison.
I am not saying MJ is not guilty, nor am I saying he is, I am merely stating that no one has yet offered evidence that can be corroborated and as such I am remaining open minded about it.
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
The opening line of "Bad"
"Your Butt Is Mine"
"Your Butt Is Mine"
Last edited by Dazzler on Thu Mar 07, 2019 11:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
This thread is the absolute crystallisation of my suspicion that the idea of a jury isn't necessarily a good idea.
-
- Posts: 17277
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2919 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
The Aussie mum .....me me me
-
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 151 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Lads listen, we now have the truth about MJ. He was a beast, even the most hardened fan can now see the truth. It also shows how much of a coward in denial Macauley Culkin is. Spineless. No wonder he wants to hide from the world, karma got him GOOD with a failed career. Lis never prosper fellas
Truth from the ranch: Don't fear the demon, Clarets
Truth from the ranch: Don't fear the demon, Clarets
-
- Posts: 17277
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2919 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Culkin holds all the answers,we will probably have to wait while he's totally destitute before he outs Jackson.
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Just watched this.
King of grooming.
Hopefully won't have to hear his noncense pervert my inner ear again.
But for fame and money he would have faced a fair trial without the pay offs. Now there is no trial and no definitive answers . Just a lesson out there and a warning to parents.
King of grooming.
Hopefully won't have to hear his noncense pervert my inner ear again.
But for fame and money he would have faced a fair trial without the pay offs. Now there is no trial and no definitive answers . Just a lesson out there and a warning to parents.
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
https://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/c ... el-jackson" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
What's the difference between Michael Jackson and Neil Armstrong?
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Foulthrow wrote:What's the difference between Michael Jackson and Neil Armstrong?
Neil Armstrong never played for PNE ?
This user liked this post: Foulthrow
-
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 151 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
More pressure on that useless hermit Culkin to revealed the truth, fellas
-
- Posts: 3155
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 837 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Was definitely found innocent because there wasn't enough evidence to prove his guilt.CoolClaret wrote:Sad state of affairs really when I guess a lot of people that defend MJ on the premises of 'its not prooven' are the same ones that bash Trump with a stick on countless false accusations (and accusations that are nowhere near as severe/abhorrebt/evil as child molesting)....
People also point to the American justice system as though its some sort of perfect system - OJ got found not guilty ffs was he innocent?
Later lost a civil suit because it happened on his property so therefore was responsible But 2 completely different things
-
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
Re: Michael Jackson documentary
Not sure why people think Culkin has anything more to share, just as Corey Feldman also says he didn't experience abuse. Not to say that Jackson is innocent, but that it wouldn't be surprising if he chose victims that had something to gain by making accusations be it money or fame. There's less comeback if a millionaire child star, adored by the public at the time, says they were abused by him.