If she was abducted, which she almost certainly was, then it is clearly not completely through the parents negligence is it? Because someone abducted her. Was James Bulger’s mother completely responsible for the murder of her son? After all, she was also negligent.mkmel wrote:"partly through their negligence"
I would say completely through their negligence putting all of their kids at risk
If they had been decent parents they would have either have stayed in with their children or taken them with them
If they had done either of these things their child still be with them
So yes completely through their negligence
Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6900 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
On episode 4 , although the mccans are very dislikeable people up to now I think Robert murat still has something to do with it!
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6900 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Because of the eye? Definitely the eye of a child abductor.Ooogeorgeorgeoghani wrote:On episode 4 , although the mccans are very dislikeable people up to now I think Robert murat still has something to do with it!
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Yes they are completely negligent as if they had stayed with their young children or taken them with them then an abductor if there was one would not have abducted MadeleineRileybobs wrote:If she was abducted, which she almost certainly was, then it is clearly not completely through the parents negligence is it? Because someone abducted her. Was James Bulger’s mother completely responsible for the murder of her son? After all, she was also negligent.
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6900 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
No. You said she disappeared completely because of their negligence which isn’t the case. Their negligence contributed to her disappearance but I think it’s fair to say that the abductor must share some of the responsibility.mkmel wrote:Yes they are completely negligent as if they had stayed with their young children or taken them with them then an abductor if there was one would not have abducted Madeleine
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish
-
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Where's the evidence of an abductor? It's OK dismissing every other theory but if you're asking for people to point to evidence about it not being an abductor then it's fair for people to ask about evidence pointing to an abductor.Rileybobs wrote:No. You said she disappeared completely because of their negligence which isn’t the case. Their negligence contributed to her disappearance but I think it’s fair to say that the abductor must share some of the responsibility.
-
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
And BTW I respect you as a poster on here. Not many make that list lol but fairs fair.
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6900 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
I don’t know why I’ve commented on this thread so much to be honest because it’s not exactly a case I’ve followed too much. Although I’m most of the way through the recent documentary series which manages to draw the whole thing out for 8 hours.WestMidsClaret wrote:Where's the evidence of an abductor? It's OK dismissing every other theory but if you're asking for people to point to evidence about it not being an abductor then it's fair for people to ask about evidence pointing to an abductor.
I just find the idea that people can wilfully accuse the parents of murder despite there being no evidence to suggest that they did pretty abhorrent. I can’t imagine being accused of anything worse. And I think their negligence and demeanour coupled with their middle class status has clouded peoples judgement to the point that people want to believe that they’re guilty.
In my opinion, the only logical explanation for what happened when everything is taken into account is that the girl was abducted. The evidence, whilst admittedly not concrete, is that the child is missing, the parents have alibis, no motive and no means to dispose of the body. All the signs point to an abduction.
This user liked this post: SammyBoy
-
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6900 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Thanks! Nice to hear!!WestMidsClaret wrote:And BTW I respect you as a poster on here. Not many make that list lol but fairs fair.
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
And dodgy eyeman called the Russian at 11.30pm on the night of the abduction even though the Russian said he only knew murat as a customer and not personally so why ring him at 11.30 plus all the hard drives that the Russian owned had been wiped , too many things stacking up for me !Rileybobs wrote:Because of the eye? Definitely the eye of a child abductor.
-
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
That's fair enough. But as I said there's about much evidence pointing to madeliene being abducted as there is to something else happening. I admit I get dragged in to these things but mainly because I don't just except what's being fed to me. Think Hillsborough, the birmingham 6 etc etc. I'm not one to jump the gun and shout conspiracy but if there's doubt and someone shows me then I stay openminded.Rileybobs wrote:I don’t know why I’ve commented on this thread so much to be honest because it’s not exactly a case I’ve followed too much. Although I’m most of the way through the recent documentary series which manages to draw the whole thing out for 8 hours.
I just find the idea that people can wilfully accuse the parents of murder despite there being no evidence to suggest that they did pretty abhorrent. I can’t imagine being accused of anything worse. And I think their negligence and demeanour coupled with their middle class status has clouded peoples judgement to the point that people want to believe that they’re guilty.
In my opinion, the only logical explanation for what happened when everything is taken into account is that the girl was abducted. The evidence, whilst admittedly not concrete, is that the child is missing, the parents have alibis, no motive and no means to dispose of the body. All the signs point to an abduction.
There really is a lot of stuff that doesn't add up about this and I can't follow the narrowtive unless someone proves things differently. It's easy to follow the narrowtive. For example pictures of Kate being pregnant. Her having all 3 children by IVF. Obviously that can be done but to have such a miracle happen and there be no pics of her pregnant doesn't sit right. Seriously if you think you're right etc delve deeper you may be surprised or at least think yes I can see why people doubt.
-
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 543 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Their stories certainly don't add up, in the Rich Hall documentaries he reads an extract from Kate's book which says on the day Madeleine was allegedly taken, she came back from a run and Gerry had already picked the kids up from the creche, but the creche records showed it was Kate who had signed the kids out. Just one of many inconsistencies, also, why is their no confirmed sightings of her by anyone outside their group between Sunday and the Thursday she went missing ?
-
- Posts: 10843
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5521 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
I haven’t seen all the “evidence” but havfn’t crèche workers/ nannies claimed to have seen her in that time seeing as the kids seemed to spend most of their time with them?AndyClaret wrote:Their stories certainly don't add up, in the Rich Hall documentaries he reads an extract from Kate's book which says on the day Madeleine was allegedly taken, she came back from a run and Gerry had already picked the kids up from the creche, but the creche records showed it was Kate who had signed the kids out. Just one of many inconsistencies, also, why is their no confirmed sightings of her by anyone outside their group between Sunday and the Thursday she went missing ?
Or are you suggesting they are all “in on it”? Or maybe they were taking her corpse around like Weekend at Bernie’s.
-
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 543 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Like i said, there is no confirmed sightings after Sunday, interestingly they sued the cop in charge after he said that they killed her and hid her body, in his book, they lost.TheFamilyCat wrote:I haven’t seen all the “evidence” but havfn’t crèche workers/ nannies claimed to have seen her in that time seeing as the kids seemed to spend most of their time with them?
Or are you suggesting they are all “in on it”? Or maybe they were taking her corpse around like Weekend at Bernie’s.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8705813/m ... lo-amaral/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by AndyClaret on Sun Mar 24, 2019 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:41 pm
- Been Liked: 469 times
- Has Liked: 434 times
- Location: Sector 7G
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
One thing that seems certain is that the investigation into the whole affair, regardless of what actually happened, seems to have been utterly bungled.
-
- Posts: 5581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1208 times
- Has Liked: 7098 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
The investigation was going fine until it was interfered with.SammyBoy wrote:One thing that seems certain is that the investigation into the whole affair, regardless of what actually happened, seems to have been utterly bungled.
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
That must have been a big bookAndyClaret wrote:Like i said, there is no confirmed sightings after Sunday, interestingly they sued the cop in charge after he said that they killed her and hid her body in his book, they lost.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8705813/m ... lo-amaral/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
You mean they had found her, or her body, or arrested the culprit? I don't see much evidence that the investigation was going well.Quicknick wrote:The investigation was going fine until it was interfered with.
Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
You can't accidentally feed a child ten pills instead of one, and minor overdoses don't kill you. Even major overdoses don't kill instantly, which they would have needed to for your theory.Goalposts wrote:i suspect they drugged there kids to sleep so they could go out.... got the dose wrong and covered it up