Does anyone know what the prize money will be for this season , if we finish 15th ?

Brighton got £107.7m finishing 15th last year but had 13 live TV games.I think we have 11 this season so would be looking at about £103.9m for finishing 15th.

Compared to £119.7m for last season...

So given the bonus pool will be lower similar profit to the recently announced figures then?

My understanding:
£84.4m equal share
£11.5m for 15th (add/subtract £1.9m for each place up/down)
£13.5m for 11 tv games (if that's right as per below).

£109.4m

LeadBelly wrote:My understanding:
£84.4m equal share
£11.5m for 15th (add/subtract £1.9m for each place up/down)
£13.5m for 11 tv games (if that's right as per below).

£109.4m

Plus a piddling amount for both the Europa and FA Cup.......maybe half a million?

There's a fixed amount of just short of £82 million per club but then there is the domestic TV money and merit fee on top. The domestic TV fee is approx £13.7 million for 11 games and if we were to finish 15th we would get a further £12 million approx.

The pic below shows what each club received last year and the money is the same this season.

Goddy wrote:Plus a piddling amount for both the Europa and FA Cup.......maybe half a million?

Oh how times have changed, a Burnley fan calling half a million pounds a piddling amount.

ClaretTony wrote:There's a fixed amount of just short of £82 million per club but then there is the domestic TV money and merit fee on top. The domestic TV fee is approx £13.7 million for 11 games and if we were to finish 15th we would get a further £12 million approx.

The pic below shows what each club received last year and the money is the same this season.

The runners up getting more than the Champions .....doesn't seem right that does it?

Steve1956 wrote:The runners up getting more than the Champions .....doesn't seem right that does it?

All based on the number of tv appearances. We in 7th had less money than 10th place Newcastle and next to bottom had less money than bottom. It will change more in favour of the top clubs next season with the change to the overseas money with them getting a bigger piece rather than it being split equally.

Steve1956 wrote:The runners up getting more than the Champions .....doesn't seem right that does it?

That'll be down to the extra tv games they had.
Like wise we got the same amount as Swansea & Watford, despite not being shown the 10 times

ClaretTony wrote:All based on the number of tv appearances. We in 7th had less money than 10th place Newcastle and next to bottom had less money than bottom. It will change more in favour of the top clubs next season with the change to the overseas money with them getting a bigger piece rather than it being split equally.

Still not right though is it,the winners not receiving the most money.

wilks_bfc wrote:Like wise we got the same amount as Swansea & Watford, despite not being shown the 10 times

Up to 11 this year so a little bit extra

ClaretTony wrote:There's a fixed amount of just short of £82 million per club but then there is the domestic TV money and merit fee on top. The domestic TV fee is approx £13.7 million for 11 games and if we were to finish 15th we would get a further £12 million approx.

The pic below shows what each club received last year and the money is the same this season.

Amazing that we were only on TV 7 times last season with some of the football we were playing.

West Ham were on 17 times...quelle surprise

Outside chance the Arsenal game might be shown if the title race decided?

Steve1956 wrote:Still not right though is it,the winners not receiving the most money.

Well then! What more proof does one need to realise the game isn't all about the money?

simonclaret wrote:Outside chance the Arsenal game might be shown if the title race decided?

I'd thought that but I suspect the top two will take it to the wire

Isn't the dividing up of the "overseas TV" money changing at some stage to give the so called big 6 a greater share?

Suratclaret wrote:Isn't the dividing up of the "overseas TV" money changing at some stage to give the so called big 6 a greater share?

A proportion will be based on league position like the domestic money is.

Suratclaret wrote:Isn't the dividing up of the "overseas TV" money changing at some stage to give the so called big 6 a greater share?

With the new deal which kicks in next season

The new deal will just push the gap even further not that it matters to who's already in this division, its getting harder and harder to keep up especially if you are a newly promoted team without backing the gap will just keep on growing
Only a breakaway will solve it but then it weakens it so whats the solution.

ClaretTony wrote:With the new deal which kicks in next season

Thanks...at least my memory is still functioning...most of the time!

Just shows how seriously we treat this one.

23 posts and not a single mention of that famous choc bar!

£107.34m apparently

Don't know if I've done this correctly however I've attached what Henry winter tweeted earlier.

4 more TV games last season.

What are “facility fees”?

wilks_bfc wrote:What are “facility fees”?

Don't know for sure but think it is based on TV appearances. Those 2 columns sort of link. More TV games, more facility fees.

Edit - looks like £1.2m per TV game.

NL Claret wrote:Don't know for sure but think it is based on TV appearances. Those 2 columns sort of link. More TV games, more facility fees.

Edit - looks like £1.2m per TV game.

That's exactly what it is, with each club paid for a minimum of 10 games irrespective of how many home games are shown.

Same favourite 'also rans' got more TV games again: Everton (19/18); Newcastle (18/19) & West Ham (17/16)

Being beloved of the media is worth a good £6/7 million a year to West Ham

Frank Lampard's Derby County should do all right financially next season, they'll be the new TV/ media darlings.

Steve1956 wrote:Still not right though is it,the winners not receiving the most money.

Not as if Man City need it

Just pocket money for them

Steve1956 wrote:Still not right though is it,the winners not receiving the most money.

Not as if Man City need it

Just pocket money for them

Royboyclaret wrote:That's exactly what it is, with each club paid for a minimum of 10 games irrespective of how many home games are shown.

for that they stipulate what they want - in recent seasons that has include dedicated power, wiring and communications equipment, 2 boxes with single pane (some kind of special glass overlooking the pitch, special floodlights and around permanent camera positions around the pitch with plug in capability. not sure if it includes the press box with all it's facilities maybe that tis just a Premier League requirement. Every payment cycle tends to lead to additional demands so we may have begun upgrading those facilities again. The promoted clubs are likely going to have to spend a whack especially the blades