https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... 1557005625" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; according to nixon Blackburn rovers after joe hart

First Coyle now Hart, we really do keep throwing our **** over the fence into our neighbour's garden

I don't know about Hart, but they've needed a Heart for quite a while now.

I sincerely hope this is true.

Hard to know whether to believe that paper when IMO they don’t send reporters to games and makes up player ratings. BfC paying him wages to play for Blackburn ? I don’t think so.

I've heard from a reliable source he's off to Scotland..

tim_noone wrote:I've heard from a reliable source he's off to Scotland..

Too Hearts ?

HunterST_BFC wrote:Too Hearts ?

No......Ayr utd

A natural downhill progression.

"So to get a deal done, Rovers would have to opt for a loan and hope Burnley give them favourable terms which would see them contributing some of his salary."

er nope

Just as long as no one boos him if we play them.

Hel go abroad

From BBC: "Blackburn are keen to sign former England goalkeeper Joe Hart, 32, from Lancashire rivals Burnley"

The effin cheek!!!!!

From Oxford Dictionary: "A person or thing competing with another for the same objective or for superiority in the same field of activity.

A person or thing that equals another in quality."

UTC!

Five million and none of this us paying half his wages bullshite and he's yours...take him away boys and good luck I think you might need it.

I wouldn't sell them a virus.

I'd sell them Joe Hart though.

If this is true, then the Venkys need their heads read. How much more money are they prepared to sink into this lame duck?

Moorite wrote:Just as long as no one boos him if we play them.

What are the odds in being drawn against them in a cup tie ?

No chance. He is way too good for the championship. Never mind Rovers.

The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.

Hart would be a good fit for B'stards .... but as for a loan with us paying part of his wages Nooooooo Wayyyyyy.

If they want him they can pay for him and pay his wages too

NL Claret wrote:The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.

He conceded forty one goals.

NL Claret wrote:The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.

If you didn’t think he played badly against Everton on Boxing Day, I’d suggest it’s you with the blinkers on.

He was that good for us that Dyche, who as we all know is hardly Mr Tinkerman, dropped him and we subsequently looked a far better defensive unit.

He did his best. He made some saves.

It just so happened that we had two heroes, in that position. He has paid the price.

Really can't see this for Hart. I think he is more likely to go to club just promoted to the prem. Also us give then "favourable terms" makes my blood boil just to think we would pay someone to play for them.

mybloodisclaret wrote:Really can't see this for Hart. I think he is more likely to go to club just promoted to the prem. Also us give then "favourable terms" makes my blood boil just to think we would pay someone to play for them.

"Love thy neighbour"? Okay maybe not...

I couldn't name a single player who came out of the Everton game without rightful criticism. I can't name a single outfield player who came out of the first half of the season with any credit but let's put it all on Hart because the team (collective) with a non existent midfield and an out of form back 4 conceded 41 goals. Some disliked him before he came for whatever reason and due to narrow mindedness won't change their views. It took some a long time to warm to Dean Marney as he was a Laws signing. Some didn't like Lenny Johnrose because of a former club of his. Some didn't like Scott Arfield as they read on Hudddersfield message board he wasn't any good. Basic.

Well Dyche ‘put it all on Hart’ because he dropped him. And maybe it was the two previous seasons of dreadful performances with West Ham and Torino that did it?

Vino blanco wrote:I sincerely hope this is true.

I hope it isn't. He is a really good goalkeeper, Why would you want someone as good as him to sign for our enemy?

NL Claret wrote:The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.

I find it strange too.
Hart is a Claret at the moment. He's not let us down?
Some on here letting him down.

Joe Hart was a massive mistake signing Tom was nearing full fitness at the time of signing Joe and we had 2 keepers who all could have stepped up short term
The sooner we move him on the better

Joe hart was a absolute liability for us just glad the manager finally saw sense before it was to late..just hope we can offload him off the wage bill now..

Definitely needs to go. Wasnt good enough for us. An unnecessary signing. Get him off the wage bill.

According to the BBC football gossip column, Mowbray is distancing himself from reports linking the club he manages with Hart...although it quotes the source as the Lancashire Telegraph.

Mowbray has said he has no idea where it has come from

Sheedyclaret wrote:Joe hart was a absolute liability for us

Yet he was winning man of the match after man of the match

He wasn’t a liability but it was clear to me he was someway behind Heaton and Pope in terms of ability.

Bordeauxclaret wrote:He wasn’t a liability but it was clear to me he was someway behind Heaton and Pope in terms of ability.

Remember coming away from West Ham after a 4-2 defeat and he'd made a major contribution to keeping the score down. One of my friends said he would leave him out because we'd tried everything else and it still wasn't working. It showed, when he eventually was left out, that it was the case.

1st half of the season Lowton, Mee, Tarky, Taylor and Cork were more a liability than Hart but some UTC posters had made their mind made up before he was signed and their memories seem to have gone just to fit their agenda.

Lowton was dropped too after the Everton game, no one calling him out.

Had to laugh during the United home game, plenty round me abusing Hart all game and then he saved a penalty. Silence, some couldn't even muster a good save lad!