IanMcL wrote:No it was a low fixed fee exit, as per the contract he signed with us

Not a lot could be done, at the time.

IanMcL wrote:No it was a low fixed fee exit, as per the contract he signed with us

Not a lot could be done, at the time.

ClaretTony wrote:You seem to think you know a lot about transfer deals. Just because there was a low, fixed exit fee does not mean there was no sell on clause inserted.

Bosscat wrote:We made money when Liverpool sold Danny to Saints and some said no sell on clause on that deal either

Longside4evr wrote:This and the Ings departure leaves a lot to be desired a contracts a contract and if both parties came to special arrangements with in then that's what it is
I think we have learnt a trick a two now

ClaretTony wrote:Liverpool haven't sold Ings to Southampton, he's on loan. But if Liverpool do sell him at a profit then we are entitled to 20% of that profit as per the tribunal.

http://www.uptheclarets.com/its-6-5-mil ... danny-ings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Tall Paul wrote:Although he is on loan to Southampton, there is an obligation for them to buy at the end of this season. I think the fee was quoted at £20m.

KRBFC wrote:After the season he's had, he won't be sold for an awful lot, the Spurs fans hate him.

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:All of them?

ClaretTony wrote:There is although I did hear they were trying to get out of it.

Bosscat wrote:We made money when Liverpool sold Danny to Saints and some said no sell on clause on that deal either

ClaretTony wrote:Liverpool haven't sold Ings to Southampton, he's on loan. But if Liverpool do sell him at a profit then we are entitled to 20% of that profit as per the tribunal.

http://www.uptheclarets.com/its-6-5-mil ... danny-ings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wile E Coyote wrote:what reason would spurs fans hate him? he has looked outstanding for them whenever i have seen him play for them.

Papabendi wrote:to all intents and purposes he was signed last summer - but the permanent part of the move will not happen until 1July. Not privy to the detail but would be very surprised if Soton had any way out of this one at this stage without a costly legal fight.

ClaretTony wrote:Liverpool haven't sold Ings to Southampton, he's on loan. But if Liverpool do sell him at a profit then we are entitled to 20% of that profit as per the tribunal.

http://www.uptheclarets.com/its-6-5-mil ... danny-ings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bosscat wrote:According to the Daily Express this morning Southampton to pay £18M to Liverpool for Ings this summer....

jojomk1 wrote:Not sure why Trippier was given the job to mark De Ligt for their first goal but he made no attempt to follow or block him
Has had a poor end to the season from a defensive point of view and can understand why Spurs may be looking for an upgrade on him and Aurier (although Walker-Peters looks promising for the future)

Burnley1989 wrote:World Cup Semi Final and Champions League Final, not bad for a lad that cant defend...….

ClaretTony wrote:You seem to think you know a lot about transfer deals. Just because there was a low, fixed exit fee does not mean there was no sell on clause inserted.

Rumbletonk wrote:It would seem a fair assessment though. Sell on clauses are normally (I would have thought) inserted to encourage the potential selling club to agree to the sale. In this case we had to sell due to the buyout clause being met so we weren't really in a position to demand anything was inserted.

KRBFC wrote:He can defend, his defending improved massively with us and he definitely didn't look out of place at Spurs before the World Cup, he's just had an absolute stinker of a season. Gifted Ajax those 2 goals Yesterday with half arsed attempts at defending, was surprised he walked back for the 2nd Ajax goal and didn't bust a gut to try and get back.

Giftonsnoidea wrote:Spurs fans seem a bit dumb, at £3.5m he was and is a bargain, who’s going to replace his crosses for them?

Seems he was and is under appreciated there....

I’d play him over Aurier any day

Spijed wrote:Depends if Spurs ever see themselves as title contenders.

If so, he would only make the bench at best at either Liverpool or Man city as he's far short of the standard required to be at that level.

If all the other England right backs stay fit he's unlikely to play for the national team again.

ClaretTony wrote:As said, they are committed to it but they've tried to get out of it. There remains the possibility that someone else could sign him.

Bordeauxclaret wrote:Doesn’t seem like they are trying very hard, they’ve included him in a rather ludicrous kit launch for next season.

Quickenthetempo wrote:Trippier is a very attacking wing back with the best cross of a full back in the league.

Spijed wrote:Better than Andrew Robertson at Liverpool?

Quickenthetempo wrote:Yep.

Liverpool just have better forwards and plenty in the box.

Spijed wrote:Andrew Robertson is a brilliant crosser. Trippier must be doing something wrong if Spurs are willing to sell him.

Spijed wrote:Trippier must be doing something wrong if Spurs are willing to sell him.

DCWat wrote:Alexander Arnold has the premier league record for assists in a season, I think. Shows how much the game has changed when his record is beating players of the ilk of Hazard, Giggs, Pires, Robben, Barnes etc.