Chelsea loanees
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Chelsea loanees
With the new rules regards only 8 players being allowed to be loaned out by each club, could we see a few bargains being snapped up. I read Chelsea have 42 players out on loan and that is with their full 25 players registered. It was said that the loan players when recalled are on £7.5 million between them. Now 8 of them can go out on loan leaving a surplus of 34 players that will be unable to play football for the year as they will not be registered.
Will Chelsea have to give these players away rather than risk losing roughly 5m a week, 250m a year ? (i have deducted 2.5m from weekly figure as it stands to reason they will look at offloading the highest earners of these on loan first)
Dont know much of any of them as a lot seem to have been bought by Roman as favours for mates. He buys them then loans them to his mates clubs. (Bit of digging and I reckon fraud charges would be brought against the club)
The only one I can think of is the Centre Half who has spent about 6 years there (if not more) and is constantly loaned out. Been at Reading a fair bit but his name I cant think of (Kalas?), always seemed a decent player and reckon as back up would be a shrewd purchase
Will Chelsea have to give these players away rather than risk losing roughly 5m a week, 250m a year ? (i have deducted 2.5m from weekly figure as it stands to reason they will look at offloading the highest earners of these on loan first)
Dont know much of any of them as a lot seem to have been bought by Roman as favours for mates. He buys them then loans them to his mates clubs. (Bit of digging and I reckon fraud charges would be brought against the club)
The only one I can think of is the Centre Half who has spent about 6 years there (if not more) and is constantly loaned out. Been at Reading a fair bit but his name I cant think of (Kalas?), always seemed a decent player and reckon as back up would be a shrewd purchase
-
- Posts: 19400
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3158 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Chelsea loanees
"New rules" these are a proposal and if voted for will begin in the 2020/21Cleveleys_claret wrote:With the new rules regards only 8 players being allowed to be loaned out by each club, could we see a few bargains being snapped up. I read Chelsea have 42 players out on loan and that is with their full 25 players registered. It was said that the loan players when recalled are on £7.5 million between them. Now 8 of them can go out on loan leaving a surplus of 34 players that will be unable to play football for the year as they will not be registered.
Will Chelsea have to give these players away rather than risk losing roughly 5m a week, 250m a year ? (i have deducted 2.5m from weekly figure as it stands to reason they will look at offloading the highest earners of these on loan first)
Dont know much of any of them as a lot seem to have been bought by Roman as favours for mates. He buys them then loans them to his mates clubs. (Bit of digging and I reckon fraud charges would be brought against the club)
The only one I can think of is the Centre Half who has spent about 6 years there (if not more) and is constantly loaned out. Been at Reading a fair bit but his name I cant think of (Kalas?), always seemed a decent player and reckon as back up would be a shrewd purchase
Re: Chelsea loanees
This isn't really the case. These loanees are part of Chelsea's business plan. Pick them up relatively cheaply, loan them out (including charging loan fees) and hopefully their reputation will be boosted enough to sell them at a profit. Look at Lukaku, they made about £15m of profit on him, same with Ake.Cleveleys_claret wrote:With the new rules regards only 8 players being allowed to be loaned out by each club, could we see a few bargains being snapped up. I read Chelsea have 42 players out on loan and that is with their full 25 players registered. It was said that the loan players when recalled are on £7.5 million between them. Now 8 of them can go out on loan leaving a surplus of 34 players that will be unable to play football for the year as they will not be registered.
Will Chelsea have to give these players away rather than risk losing roughly 5m a week, 250m a year ? (i have deducted 2.5m from weekly figure as it stands to reason they will look at offloading the highest earners of these on loan first)
Dont know much of any of them as a lot seem to have been bought by Roman as favours for mates. He buys them then loans them to his mates clubs. (Bit of digging and I reckon fraud charges would be brought against the club)
The only one I can think of is the Centre Half who has spent about 6 years there (if not more) and is constantly loaned out. Been at Reading a fair bit but his name I cant think of (Kalas?), always seemed a decent player and reckon as back up would be a shrewd purchase
Re: Chelsea loanees
Sounds like something sensible that would help smaller clubs. Not going to happen then.Chester Perry wrote:"New rules" these are a proposal and if voted for will begin in the 2020/21
As for Chelsea having 40 odd players on loan. Madness. Pure madness.
-
- Posts: 5642
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
- Been Liked: 766 times
- Has Liked: 499 times
- Location: Devon
Re: Chelsea loanees
Was thinking the same thing myself with the provision that we don’t get someone like that long streak of P Chaloah (spelling) like we did last time.Cleveleys_claret wrote:With the new rules regards only 8 players being allowed to be loaned out by each club, could we see a few bargains being snapped up. I read Chelsea have 42 players out on loan and that is with their full 25 players registered. It was said that the loan players when recalled are on £7.5 million between them. Now 8 of them can go out on loan leaving a surplus of 34 players that will be unable to play football for the year as they will not be registered.
Will Chelsea have to give these players away rather than risk losing roughly 5m a week, 250m a year ? (i have deducted 2.5m from weekly figure as it stands to reason they will look at offloading the highest earners of these on loan first)
Dont know much of any of them as a lot seem to have been bought by Roman as favours for mates. He buys them then loans them to his mates clubs. (Bit of digging and I reckon fraud charges would be brought against the club)
The only one I can think of is the Centre Half who has spent about 6 years there (if not more) and is constantly loaned out. Been at Reading a fair bit but his name I cant think of (Kalas?), always seemed a decent player and reckon as back up would be a shrewd purchase
Re: Chelsea loanees
Chelsea have one of the best youth development programmes in world football, Atsu, Chalobah, Van-Aanholt, Bertrand Traore, Bamford, Ryan Bertrand, Sam Hutchinson, Josh McEachran, Jeffrey Bruma, Ake, Solanke, Loftus Cheek, Christensen, Abraham.
Then the youngsters they buy like Courtois, De Bruyne, Lukaku and Matic which they make huge profit on.
Then the youngsters they buy like Courtois, De Bruyne, Lukaku and Matic which they make huge profit on.
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Chelsea loanees
Bamford? - he was signed from Nottingham ForestKRBFC wrote:Chelsea have one of the best youth development programmes in world football, Atsu, Chalobah, Van-Aanholt, Bertrand Traore, Bamford, Ryan Bertrand, Sam Hutchinson, Josh McEachran, Jeffrey Bruma, Ake, Solanke, Loftus Cheek, Christensen, Abraham.
Then the youngsters they buy like Courtois, De Bruyne, Lukaku and Matic which they make huge profit on.
Re: Chelsea loanees
Atsu, Van-Aanholt, Traore, Christensen, Bamford, Bruma and Ake were all signedKRBFC wrote:Chelsea have one of the best youth development programmes in world football, Atsu, Chalobah, Van-Aanholt, Bertrand Traore, Bamford, Ryan Bertrand, Sam Hutchinson, Josh McEachran, Jeffrey Bruma, Ake, Solanke, Loftus Cheek, Christensen, Abraham.
Then the youngsters they buy like Courtois, De Bruyne, Lukaku and Matic which they make huge profit on.
Re: Chelsea loanees
Ake was signed to the Chelsea youth team, developed there and sold for big money. The same as Dwight Mcneil, we signed him but still played a major role in his development and I'd say he was a product of our youth programme.bumba wrote:Atsu, Van-Aanholt, Traore, Christensen, Bamford, Bruma and Ake were all signed