CombatClaret wrote:Jailed for 9 months

CombatClaret wrote:Jailed for 9 months

ha!

Got off quite lightly.

Hahahahaha, that’ll get some on here to part with their earnings once again

Hes still a legend

Haha haha. Don’t drop the soap Thomas.

theroyaldyche wrote:Hes still a legend

Among blithering idiots and racists, of course he is. But now he's a locked-up legend.

theroyaldyche wrote:Hes still a legend

So are the Krays and many others of dubious character.

He's already served half of the time with his previous imprisonment so it will actually be 19 weeks, half of which will be in prison.

If anyone wants a laugh you can see his supporters protesting here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQFbCUR ... e=youtu.be" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(I won't hazard a guess as to why Russia Today is broadcasting it)

Imploding Turtle wrote:Among blithering idiots and racists, of course he is. But now he's a locked-up legend.

Reminds me of some1

Jeez..the "Top Chat" scrolling feed to the right of that video is like a written open sewer.
Anyway it's a pleasing thought that Mr Y-L is out of the way for a while.

theroyaldyche wrote:Hes still a legend

For those who want people who sexually abuse children to go free he is.

aggi wrote:If anyone wants a laugh you can see his supporters protesting here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQFbCUR ... e=youtu.be" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(I won't hazard a guess as to why Russia Today is broadcasting it)

We both know why Russia Today are interested in it.

Stalbansclaret wrote:Jeez..the "Top Chat" scrolling feed to the right of that video is like a written open sewer.
Anyway it's a pleasing thought that Mr Y-L is out of the way for a while.

"I’ve never seen so many white people in one place.”

Lol. They can't find the high court.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQFbCUR ... e=youtu.be" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Now they're trying to break in.

Can't stop committing crimes.

I walked past the Old Bailey this morning, I didn't need to check what the crowd were gathering for what a total bunch of racist morons.

theroyaldyche wrote:Reminds me of some1

Damo want's to know why you're not down there protesting. He thinks you're a virtue-signaller for not being down there protesting against his trial.

At least he’ll be home for Christmas!

Burnley Ace wrote:At least he’ll be home for Christmas!

Haven't you heard? Christmas was banned because of the muzzers.

Imploding Turtle wrote:Lol. They can't find the high court.

The big point what people are missing is the fact that the accused in the original trial were granted anonymity until sentencing, yet when other high profile sex offenders such as Stuart Hall and Max Clifford were arrested their names were made public. Theresa May in Parliament said they were made public to allow others to come forward so why wasn’t those accused in the Leeds trial made public surely it could have persuaded others to come forward to make an even stronger case.

I have no sympathy with TR he knew the facts so shouldn’t have filmed he should have made the case as to why they were granted anonymity when Stuart Hall wasn’t

Did he release facebook videos when white defendants in other cases had the benefit of anonymity?

Has no one told them they're late for the Pride parade?

Can’t believe Dumb Donny didn’t come to his rescue.

He’s going to a prison which 140% the inmates are Muslim

TheFamilyCat wrote:He’s going to a prison which 140% the inmates are Muslim

140% that's a new one on me since I was at school

durhamclaret wrote:140% that's a new one on me since I was at school

Yes. 140%. What, are you going to deny maths now? Fake news.

Dy1geo wrote:The big point what people are missing is the fact that the accused in the original trial were granted anonymity until sentencing, yet when other high profile sex offenders such as Stuart Hall and Max Clifford were arrested their names were made public. Theresa May in Parliament said they were made public to allow others to come forward so why wasn’t those accused in the Leeds trial made public surely it could have persuaded others to come forward to make an even stronger case.

I have no sympathy with TR he knew the facts so shouldn’t have filmed he should have made the case as to why they were granted anonymity when Stuart Hall wasn’t

This bit isn't true. They had been named in news reports prior to the case.

aggi wrote:This bit isn't true. They had been named in news reports prior to the case.

The Leeds trial was part of a bigger case hence reporting restrictions.

But on your point I read in the Independent recently that police had arrested 44 people in the Kirklees area over sexual abuse of teenage girls in Yorkshire, can’t find their names anywhere so musn’t have been made public yet, not linked to another case.

I hope uses this time wisely and thinks about what he's going to wear in the future. He's got some truly awful clothes.

Could maybe give the halfwitted racism a rethink too, but I'd make the tailoring a priority.

Does this mean he's now a failed asylum seeker?

The crowd marched towards the Old Bailey chanting "we want Tommy out"


That'll tell em.

NottsClaret wrote:I hope uses this time wisely and thinks about what he's going to wear in the future. He's got some truly awful clothes.

Could maybe give the halfwitted racism a rethink too, but I'd make the tailoring a priority.

Is there a specific "Dress code" your suggesting? Out of curiosity what do you wear on a daily basis? Excluding Sundays.

When you demonise people then crazy people get violent against them. Like here.

This is what Tommy supporters want to happen when they champion him as he demonises people.

https://twitter.com/MikeStuchbery_/stat ... 14240?s=20" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

aggi wrote:He's already served half of the time with his previous imprisonment so it will actually be 19 weeks, half of which will be in prison.

Poor little fella, he'll get turned out in his first night and spend the next few months as Mr. Big's wife.

Reckoner wrote:Did he release facebook videos when white defendants in other cases had the benefit of anonymity?

I take it that's a rhetorical question.

Tommy against thick so he must have known that revealing details of an ongoing trial would land him in stew,according to some social media posts he not only filmed the accused,but also filmed the defendant's therefore placing them in a potential harmful situation,that's how much good old Tommy cares about the victims of grooming gangs.

It's also being mentioned how on earth a guy with a lengthy criminal record,and who apparently has no stable employment can afford a million pound property,i wonder who funds this lavish lifestyle

Dy1geo wrote:The Leeds trial was part of a bigger case hence reporting restrictions.

But on your point I read in the Independent recently that police had arrested 44 people in the Kirklees area over sexual abuse of teenage girls in Yorkshire, can’t find their names anywhere so musn’t have been made public yet, not linked to another case.

Yes, there were reporting restrictions but the defendants had been named in the press prior to the case. They weren't anonymous.

I don't know about the Kirklees case. From a quick look they don't seem to have been charged yet so the police wouldn't have released any names.

Although I was quite amused to see that one of his defences was in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights. I'm sure Tommy isn't normally a fan of it.

So he is going to serve 9.5 weeks......according to him he will be dead in 1! Please Trump, take him!

When a celebrity’s agent is doing his job and applying for ‘super injunctions’ he keeps his client’s name out of the press. Once the client is in the legal/judicial system the agent wants his client’s name splashed all over the media, as he will then make a submission to the judge that his client will not be afforded a fair trial due to the advanced publicity of the trial and all subsequent reports published.

Watched a minute or two or the RT steam earlier. This ringleader covered his mouth but was quite audible when he said

Anythings that's not nailed down, **** it up

- someones beaten me to it - https://twitter.com/Awarddas/status/1149278262541082624" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Just finished ripping up a peaceful pro-EU demo near Parliament

CombatClaret wrote:Watched a minute or two or the RT steam earlier. This ringleader covered his mouth but was quite audible when he said

Anythings that's not nailed down, **** it up

- someones beaten me to it - https://twitter.com/Awarddas/status/1149278262541082624" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

TR.jpg

Just finished ripping up a peaceful pro-EU demo near Parliament

I believe that's failed kidnapper, Danny Thomas.

They might be able to share a cell?

My heart bleeds... but hopefully not as much as his arse will

fidelcastro wrote:My heart bleeds... but hopefully not as much as his arse will

Uh oh. That joke's going to get the snowflakes melting.

Imploding Turtle wrote:Uh oh. That joke's going to get the snowflakes melting.

What makes you think I was joking?

Dy1geo wrote:The Leeds trial was part of a bigger case hence reporting restrictions.

But on your point I read in the Independent recently that police had arrested 44 people in the Kirklees area over sexual abuse of teenage girls in Yorkshire, can’t find their names anywhere so musn’t have been made public yet, not linked to another case.

I'd hazard a guess that there are 44 linked cases