• Lancs Vs Worcs

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:20 pm**

Lancs have got off to a great start with Worcs being 37/6.

Jimmy and Onions have 3 wickets a piece. Link to the live steam here.

https://cricket.lancashirecricket.co.uk ... stershire/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 pm**

Another for Jimmy

38/7

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:25 pm**

in the bar for dinner time.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:26 pm**

Swinging a bit by any chance ??

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 1:34 pm**

66 for 7.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 2:38 pm**

132 for 8. Tail is wagging

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 3:29 pm**

149/9 Jimmy just got his 5 for,guess we'll find out soon how good a total this is once Lancs are batting.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 3:34 pm**

Letting them off the hook by the sound of things and other scores in both leagues suggest it is a p**s poor batting day

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 3:48 pm**

Worcestershire 172 all out

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 3:50 pm**

From 38/7 they’ll be more than happy.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 4:59 pm**

22-2 in reply

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 6:13 pm**

80 for 3 batting the last 5 overs of the day out

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 7:31 pm**

Its not how you start ... its how you finish

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 7:54 pm**

Finished 88 for 5.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 7:55 pm**

5th wicket was Jimmy Anderson tho

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 10:04 pm**

Worcs in the ascendancy now. Poor from Lancashire after having them at 30 odd for 7.

Posted: **Tue May 21, 2019 12:15 am**

Strange day of cricket,brilliant morning session then let Worcs amass at least 50 too many,then a reasonable start with the bat,and then those final 2 wickets give Worcs the slight edge,bearing in mind Lancs have to bat fourth.

Pleasing from an Ashes POV to see Jimmy fit and firing after his injury,frustrating for Hameed he got a platform and then got out.

At this rate if the weather stays fair day 3 will see a conclusion one way or the other.

Posted: **Tue May 21, 2019 3:39 pm**

Worcs 54-3 in their 2nd dig,leading by only 25,Lancs 201 all out,important 6th wicket partnership of nearly a 100 between Livingstone and Vilas,Lancs should win from here but we don't want to be chasing anything over 150 given the lack of runs in the match thus far.

Posted: **Tue May 21, 2019 4:43 pm**

81 for 6 now. Just 52 ahead.

Posted: **Tue May 21, 2019 5:27 pm**

103 for 7. 74 ahead.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 11:18 am**

Worcs 154 all out. Lancs require 126 to win.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 11:36 am**

Could have done with keeping the target under 100 given how wickets are falling in this match.

We are a wicket down already. 8/1 after 2 overs.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 12:07 pm**

Another gone. Poor batting, nothing in the pitch, no swing. Just straight bowling and batsmen missing.

We need a top class batsman to replace Joe Burns. If there's any available now.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 12:21 pm**

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 12:21 pm**

ClaretTony wrote:32/4

it is ok we still have Croft to enter the fray

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 12:32 pm**

Doing our best to make a pigs ear of this run chase.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 12:37 pm**

Gonna be touch and go!. Struggling at 43 for 4.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 1:16 pm**

59/4 at lunch

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 1:21 pm**

Just under half the runs needed with just over half the wickets remaining. Should make for an interesting finish.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:11 pm**

74/4 - still plenty to do

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:12 pm**

83/4... 43 to go

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:18 pm**

91/4 - another 35 still so can’t afford to lose another wicket

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:25 pm**

103/4 steady knock from Vilas in a low scorer

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:31 pm**

Vilas got his 50

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:42 pm**

Vilas digs us out time and time again. We desperately need to improve with the bat. Our bowling attack however, is different gravy!

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:43 pm**

Single figures needed 117/4 9 required

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:43 pm**

Down to single figures - 9 required

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 2:49 pm**

Won by 6 wickets

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 4:18 pm**

Good win but a club that needs to get itself together. A chief exec more interested in how much profit the club can make than results on the field, a director of cricket getting into arguments with members, the Cumbria fiasco and the ex captain arguing with supporters on Twitter

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 4:34 pm**

Local cricketer wrote:Good win but a club that needs to get itself together. A chief exec more interested in how much profit the club can make than results on the field, a director of cricket getting into arguments with members, the Cumbria fiasco and the ex captain arguing with supporters on Twitter

What was the Cumbria fiasco? Think that passed me by

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 4:35 pm**

JohnDearyMe wrote:What was the Cumbria fiasco? Think that passed me by

We are playing a home game in Cumbria?

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 4:36 pm**

Local cricketer wrote:Good win but a club that needs to get itself together. A chief exec more interested in how much profit the club can make than results on the field, a director of cricket getting into arguments with members, the Cumbria fiasco and the ex captain arguing with supporters on Twitter

I would have thought that was the chief exec’s job. Who’s the ex captain?

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 4:39 pm**

ClaretTony wrote:We are playing a home game in Cumbria?

Ah thanks. Bet Lytham, Blackpool & Southport weren't too pleased with that news (I'm presuming they were overlooked)

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 4:57 pm**

ClaretTony wrote:I would have thought that was the chief exec’s job. Who’s the ex captain?

Livingstone. I'm presuming that's why he is ex captain

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 6:00 pm**

Local cricketer wrote:Livingstone. I'm presuming that's why he is ex captain

Livingstone let it be known very strongly that his football favours are with a team who play in blue & white halves. He set himself up nicely ahead of our League Cup tie at Ewood.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 6:05 pm**

JohnDearyMe wrote:Ah thanks. Bet Lytham, Blackpool & Southport weren't too pleased with that news (I'm presuming they were overlooked)

Lancs, through Paul Allott, said there were pitch problems at Southport and at Blackpool it is drainage and poor dressing room facilities.

But to use Sedburgh, which is actually within the Yorkshire Dales, is a nonsense.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 6:17 pm**

ClaretTony wrote:But to use Sedburgh, which is actually within the Yorkshire Dales, is a nonsense.

It's to forge links with a posh private school.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 6:25 pm**

Sedbergh is handy for me, though!

To be fair, the club are laying on free transport from Manchester, and free shuttle buses from Oxenholme railway station to Sedbergh and back.

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 7:31 pm**

Given the standard of batting in the County Championship do we still need 4 day matches?
Spent 2 days at the Riverside watching Durham and Gloucester, poor cricket with feeble batting. I don't think anyone made 50 and 3 division 2 games including Lancs finished in less than 3 days. It is no wonder that England have difficulty finding test class batsmen with Vince and Ballance amongst the best, je despair!

Posted: **Wed May 22, 2019 10:23 pm**

ClaretTony wrote:Lancs, through Paul Allott, said there were pitch problems at Southport and at Blackpool it is drainage and poor dressing room facilities.

But to use Sedburgh, which is actually within the Yorkshire Dales, is a nonsense.

Are any of the larger Lancashire league grounds (Ramsbottom, Haslingden etc) not capable of being an outground? Guessing their facilities might not be suitable?

Lancs Vs Worcs

Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs

Re: Lancs Vs Worcs