Hazard : £130 Million?
-
- Posts: 18005
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Hazard : £130 Million?
(Sky Sports News)
Chelsea are "understood" to be requiring £130 million for Eden Hazard.
Real Madrid value him at £88 mil.
Chelsea's valuation about right?
Chelsea are "understood" to be requiring £130 million for Eden Hazard.
Real Madrid value him at £88 mil.
Chelsea's valuation about right?
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Probably the best player in the world at the moment
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 67887
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Given the way he started against us recently I'd add a 0 on that, but if Real Madrid do get him then I'd suggest Barcelona sign Matt Lowton & Jeff Hendrick because they sorted it all out.
These 3 users liked this post: bobinho IanMcL Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 9329
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4106 times
- Has Liked: 6588 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Aye... £130,000. Plus add ons.
-
- Posts: 19406
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
so you want to pay him just 3 days a weekbobinho wrote:Aye... £130,000. Plus add ons.
-
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 992 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Don't think that's what he was getting at Chester.Chester Perry wrote:so you want to pay him just 3 days a week
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
1 year left on his contract, so in 6 months he can sort a free transfer out. Chelsea in cloud cuckoo land
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
ThisVegas Claret wrote:1 year left on his contract, so in 6 months he can sort a free transfer out. Chelsea in cloud cuckoo land
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
3 a week of our choice, depending on TV switches, should just do it!Chester Perry wrote:so you want to pay him just 3 days a week
-
- Posts: 19406
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Don't think you got what I was getting at eitherGoody1975 wrote:Don't think that's what he was getting at Chester.
-
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 992 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Chester Perry wrote:Don't think you got what I was getting at either
I obviously don't
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
City have priced Sane at £90 million and UTD are ready to meet Griezmann's release clause at £107 million so perhaps yes a Hazard deal could well command £130 million, silly as it is.
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
I don't think Sane or Griezmann have just 1 year left on contract.
That is the difference and why Chelsea are living in cloud cuckoo land expecting 130 m. That is wether or not you think Hazard is better than those 2. Sane is younger and Griezmann is a World Cup winner.
That is the difference and why Chelsea are living in cloud cuckoo land expecting 130 m. That is wether or not you think Hazard is better than those 2. Sane is younger and Griezmann is a World Cup winner.
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Hazard is far better than both and Coutinio.
The one year left means nothing if Chelsea don't want to sell.
They would be better keeping him for another season and letting him go for free than selling and not being allowed to sign a replacement.
The one year left means nothing if Chelsea don't want to sell.
They would be better keeping him for another season and letting him go for free than selling and not being allowed to sign a replacement.
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
The stats paint a whole different picture unfortunately, he's one of the flashiest looking players, beats men for fun and a joy to watch but in terms of cold hard stats, it's bizarre how he doesn't contribute as many goals/assists as he should with the clear ability he has.Spijed wrote:Probably the best player in the world at the moment
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Fully agree with that. Can’t see way he’s rated so highly and Raheem Sterling often being called overrated.KRBFC wrote:The stats paint a whole different picture unfortunately, he's one of the flashiest looking players, beats men for fun and a joy to watch but in terms of cold hard stats, it's bizarre how he doesn't contribute as many goals/assists as he should with the clear ability he has.
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 313 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
He had the most combined goals and assists in the PL this seasonKRBFC wrote:The stats paint a whole different picture unfortunately, he's one of the flashiest looking players, beats men for fun and a joy to watch but in terms of cold hard stats, it's bizarre how he doesn't contribute as many goals/assists as he should with the clear ability he has.
-
- Posts: 4980
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2341 times
- Has Liked: 1041 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
If his agent has anything about him, he'll stay at Chelsea & open negotiations after Christmas .. available on a " free ", so a big signing on fee for our Belgian friend, and a decent spiv. for his agent, given that no transfer fee is involved ....
-
- Posts: 18005
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Chelsea aren't expecting £130 mil. It's the usual bargaining tactic of initially going "high", so when negotiations get going, they won't come out with " low".Hibsclaret wrote:
That is the difference and why Chelsea are living in cloud cuckoo land expecting 130 m.
They'll come out with "middle" price, around £100 mil.(ish)
If he moves.
-
- Posts: 4069
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
He provided more assists than anybody else in the league this year while scoring 16 goals in a team which, relatively speaking, under-performed.KRBFC wrote:The stats paint a whole different picture unfortunately, he's one of the flashiest looking players, beats men for fun and a joy to watch but in terms of cold hard stats, it's bizarre how he doesn't contribute as many goals/assists as he should with the clear ability he has.
-
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 494 times
- Has Liked: 162 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Probably the best opponent I've seen at TM since Fabregas, just for his cameo role towards the end of the 17/18 season. Don't somehow think it's the best move for him at present, were he to move to RM.
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Isn't worth half of what Chelsea value him at
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
If he was available for £65m pretty much all the major clubs in Europe would queuing up to sign him.bumba wrote:Isn't worth half of what Chelsea value him at
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
.taio wrote:If he was available for £65m pretty much all the major clubs in Europe would queuing up to sign him.
Yes because that's what he's worth, his seasons are very inconsistent.
£130 million will only have one desperate club willing to pay
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
You said he wasn't worth half that before. He's been one of the most consistent PL players for several years.bumba wrote:.
Yes because that's what he's worth, his seasons are very inconsistent.
£130 million will only have one desperate club willing to pay
-
- Posts: 3155
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 836 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
That was a weird day. I couldn't quite work out if we couldn't get the ball off him or didn't want to get the ball off him because he was killing us but doing nothingashtonlongsider wrote:Probably the best opponent I've seen at TM since Fabregas, just for his cameo role towards the end of the 17/18 season. Don't somehow think it's the best move for him at present, were he to move to RM.
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Consistent in what sense? Always hard to get the ball off an looking good yes.taio wrote:You said he wasn't worth half that before. He's been one of the most consistent PL players for several years.
Stat wise.... No.
A goal just under every 3 games is OK but only an assist every 4.5 games, hit highs of 16 goals one season but season after got his lowest goal tally of 4, that's inconsistent.
-
- Posts: 18094
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3864 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
At the moment you would definately say Real Madrid need Hazard more than Chelsea need 130m quid.
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Yeah but when judging the worlds best, I think consistency over many years is important, 15/16 he had 4 goals and 3 assists in 31 league games. previous to this season, he had 12 assists in 3 years and only 32 goals. For a man with his talent, one of the best dribblers I have ever seen, he doesn't half blow hot and cold on a regular basis.Swizzlestick wrote:He provided more assists than anybody else in the league this year while scoring 16 goals in a team which, relatively speaking, under-performed.
-
- Posts: 5642
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
- Been Liked: 766 times
- Has Liked: 499 times
- Location: Devon
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Isn’t there a transfer ban at Chelsea?
Re: Hazard : £130 Million?
Yes - obviously only on them signing players.South West Claret. wrote:Isn’t there a transfer ban at Chelsea?