BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Palace reportedly close to wrapping up Camarasa deal. €12-15m, personal terms agreed.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Another one bites the dust.SGr wrote:Palace reportedly close to wrapping up Camarasa deal. €12-15m, personal terms agreed.
-
- Posts: 6900
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4324 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Bargain at that price
These 2 users liked this post: rob63 tiger76
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Which if like any of our previous 4th choice strikers, will be lucky to get 90 minutes for the whole season combined.FactualFrank wrote:So will this mean we're keeping hold of Wells as our now 4th forward?
I'm happy to ship out Vydra, as obviously something has gone on ( too much talking in the media ) and Mr Dyche doesnt fancy him.
Think he was got as Jay Rod wasnt available, now he is here, I think it'll be tatty bye.
Still certain we will bring in at least 2 more bodies.
There were murmurs we were looking at a few younger lads for the future, that would command fees.
I wouldn't be adverse to spending a few million there ( which will be easily spare ) once the first team had been taken care of.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
I expect Palace will beat us to every ticked box for a player like him.Longsider wrote:Another one bites the dust.
This user liked this post: rob63
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:44 am
- Been Liked: 64 times
- Has Liked: 278 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Longsider wrote:Another one bites the dust.
So you know he wanted to come to burnley and not London?
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
No I don't know that. My post was saying another of our possible links is not coming to Burnley.creepingdeath wrote:So you know he wanted to come to burnley and not London?
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Name me a player who had to choose between us and another team? .... You have to put bids in for that to happen!So you know he wanted to come to burnley and not London?
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
The key one being Palace have deeper pockets and can pay more.FactualFrank wrote:I expect Palace will beat us to every ticked box for a player like him.
This user liked this post: creepingdeath
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:44 am
- Been Liked: 64 times
- Has Liked: 278 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
BigChaCha wrote:Name me a player who had to choose between us and another team? .... You have to put bids in for that to happen!
And you know we havent bid for him?
-
- Posts: 10899
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Wasn’t it reported that Colin said we’d asked Cardiff for a reference? If that’s right there was clear interest. His agent may simply have told us that he didn’t fancy it.
This user liked this post: creepingdeath
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
MarkGreen wrote:Gibson just tweeted this.
Am I reading too much into it by thinking he might be covering his tracks about being spotted at the Riverside to avoid speculation? Or could he simply just mean he'll be watcing on TV?
Probably no different than when Sam Vokes was seen singing Que Sera Sera at Anfield when Southampton got to Wembley.
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
He said that Palace had asked for a reference and that we'd enquired.TheFamilyCat wrote:Wasn’t it reported that Colin said we’d asked Cardiff for a reference? If that’s right there was clear interest. His agent may simply have told us that he didn’t fancy it.
This user liked this post: creepingdeath
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
And if Neuhaus is having a medical today he's very likely going somewhere else.
This user liked this post: creepingdeath
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Yes, £3m ..... in instalments over 10 years.And you know we havent bid for him?
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
What time is the latest on thursday players can sign to be eligible to play on saturday ?ClaretTony wrote:And if Neuhaus is having a medical today he's very likely going somewhere else.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Looking like a typical burnley/Dyche transfer window then. Poor disappointment
-
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2329 times
- Has Liked: 1401 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Groundhog Day
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It's Friday!!Reecey1987 wrote:What time is the latest on thursday players can sign to be eligible to play on saturday ?
-
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2596 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Aye it is - almost represents value in a crazy summer, but I think I saw last year that Palace had the 17th highest wage bill in the whole of Europe.randomclaret2 wrote:Bargain at that price
It's frustrating for everyone but he'll be wanting a 3 - more likely 4 - year deal. That's a massive commitment if you're one of the few clubs left without a 'sugar daddy' owner.
This user liked this post: creepingdeath
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
5pm, I think.Reecey1987 wrote:What time is the latest on thursday players can sign to be eligible to play on saturday ?
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Window closes at 5 p.m.Reecey1987 wrote:What time is the latest on thursday players can sign to be eligible to play on saturday ?
http://www.uptheclarets.com/friendlies-and-key-dates" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: Reecey1987
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It is. That’s why the transfer window closes at 5pm next Thursday. At least it’ll all be over by the time I get home from work and I won’t spend the evening watching SSN in the forlorn hope we’ll sign someone else.FactualFrank wrote:5pm, I think.
-
- Posts: 8467
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2461 times
- Has Liked: 1992 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
So it was Adam Phillips having a medical at 10am. All’s well.
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:44 am
- Been Liked: 64 times
- Has Liked: 278 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Maguire to man yoo is happening batten down the hatches
-
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3079 times
- Has Liked: 5044 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Makes a change from Arry when he was at QPR. Every player we got linked with, they were linked the next day.FactualFrank wrote:I expect Palace will beat us to every ticked box for a player like him.
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Maguire to Man Utdcreepingdeath wrote:Maguire to man yoo is happening batten down the hatches
Dunk to Leicester
Webster to Brighton
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
From the BeeB:
Crystal Palace have joined Burnley and West Ham United in trying to sign 33-year-old England centre-back Gary Cahill, who is a free agent after leaving Chelsea.(Mail)
Crystal Palace have joined Burnley and West Ham United in trying to sign 33-year-old England centre-back Gary Cahill, who is a free agent after leaving Chelsea.(Mail)
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Hopefully. Way too late in the window to be selling someone like Tarky. We may get £50 mil, but we get more than double that if we remain in the Prem.Vegas Claret wrote:Maguire to Man Utd
Dunk to Leicester
Webster to Brighton
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
If 2 London teams are chasing him,i can't see him moving up North,wages would be hefty as well,plus no resale value,unless Tarks or Gibson are moving on,or indeed both,i can't see where he'd fit into our 1st 11,and at his age he'd need to be playing regularly,that's the reason he left Chelsea,he wasn't getting enough footie.Spijed wrote:From the BeeB:
Crystal Palace have joined Burnley and West Ham United in trying to sign 33-year-old England centre-back Gary Cahill, who is a free agent after leaving Chelsea.(Mail)
-
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3079 times
- Has Liked: 5044 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It would only make sense if we already have a guaranteed replacement.FactualFrank wrote:Hopefully. Way too late in the window to be selling someone like Tarky. We may get £50 mil, but we get more than double that if we remain in the Prem.
I'd rather we kept him, but much like Heats, if he wants to go it would be silly to keep an unhappy player. I think Tarks is worth 50mill if Maguire is worth 85, but I cant see Leicesyer being willing to pay that.
-
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 543 times
Harry maguire
Fee agreed with Man Utd, cue the Tarky speculation now.....
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:44 am
- Been Liked: 64 times
- Has Liked: 278 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
FactualFrank wrote:Hopefully. Way too late in the window to be selling someone like Tarky. We may get £50 mil, but we get more than double that if we remain in the Prem.
50 million release clause bandied about but not confirmed so we’d have no option if they triggered that
-
- Posts: 3916
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 833 times
- Has Liked: 1324 times
- Location: burnley
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
At least it gives us time to replace Tarks if he is going
-
- Posts: 17246
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6485 times
- Has Liked: 2910 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Harry maguire
Seen it somewhere today Leicester are going to offer £25 million + addons for Tarkowski sell Maguire for £80 million then try to have our pants down you have to admire their cheekAndyClaret wrote:Fee agreed with Man Utd, cue the Tarky speculation now.....
-
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1600 times
- Has Liked: 679 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
What is Cahill worth?
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
No, we appear to have a gap between the ages of 19-25, Taylor excepted. Does seem to require some investmentMACCA wrote:Which if like any of our previous 4th choice strikers, will be lucky to get 90 minutes for the whole season combined.
I'm happy to ship out Vydra, as obviously something has gone on ( too much talking in the media ) and Mr Dyche doesnt fancy him.
Think he was got as Jay Rod wasnt available, now he is here, I think it'll be tatty bye.
Still certain we will bring in at least 2 more bodies.
There were murmurs we were looking at a few younger lads for the future, that would command fees.
I wouldn't be adverse to spending a few million there ( which will be easily spare ) once the first team had been taken care of.
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
There's a reason Brighton are spending 22 million on a CB
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 507 times
- Has Liked: 1037 times
Re: Harry maguire
Tell ‘em to go whistle. Unless he does have an escape clause that he wants to use. If he wants to move and doesn’t have a release clause we can play hardball for £65m, settling for £60m. Only following Leicester’s lead.
Re: Harry maguire
If Leicester were to offer £25 million for Tarks I would hope the phone is slammed down at Turf Moor after saying come back with three times that.Steve1956 wrote:Seen it somewhere today Leicester are going to offer £25 million + addons for Tarkowski sell Maguire for £80 million then try to have our pants down you have to admire their cheek
In fact as Maguire is left sided Gibson may be a better option for Leicester at, say, £50 million
Re: Harry maguire
I saw somewhere else that if they sold Maguire they might not replace him straight away as they had 4 centre backs on their books already. Not sure if this is their plan but .......
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:33 pm
- Been Liked: 40 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It would be mad for Leicester not to have someone lined up to replace Maguire as every man and his dog has known that Maguire and his massive bonce were heading to Old Trafford. If we sold Tarkowski, then it would be equally mad if we didn't have someone lined up to replace him. Doesn’t take much for the average fan to make a link with Tarkowski and Leicester now Maguire has gone so surely the club will know if this is going to happen.
Re: Harry maguire
Yes. Just read it £85 million. That makes it £10 million more than for Van Dijk at Liverpool and proves that football is f+++ing crazy.
This user liked this post: Buxtonclaret
Re: Harry maguire
Maguire isn't even a world class footballer!Stayingup wrote:Yes. Just read it £85 million. That makes it £10 million more than for Van Dijk at Liverpool and proves that football is f+++ing crazy.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
We've signed two players in that age group today.rob63 wrote:No, we appear to have a gap between the ages of 19-25, Taylor excepted. Does seem to require some investment
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Re: Harry maguire
Fully agree but its the premium that seems to be put on English players. Plus these clubs with foreign owners do not need to sell unless they get silly fees like this. This is where we will always struggle when keeping players. But rather have what we have than an owner who is using us for fun for a couple of yearsSpijed wrote:Maguire isn't even a world class footballer!
-
- Posts: 17246
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6485 times
- Has Liked: 2910 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Harry maguire
Maguire isn't fit to lace VVD's boots.Spijed wrote:Maguire isn't even a world class footballer!
-
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1464 times
- Has Liked: 995 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
McNeil?rob63 wrote:No, we appear to have a gap between the ages of 19-25, Taylor excepted. Does seem to require some investment
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
According to some reports he didn't want to leave Spain full stop, so the bright lights of London may have been a slight inducementTheFamilyCat wrote:Wasn’t it reported that Colin said we’d asked Cardiff for a reference? If that’s right there was clear interest. His agent may simply have told us that he didn’t fancy it.
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Peacock Farrell, McNeil, Dunne, Koiki, Benson that we know of. This is why clubs have U23 sides now. Players are probably playing 5 years longer than they were 20 years ago meaning not as many young lads are getting a chance. Managers arent willing to risk there job on an untried youngster over an experienced pro. Too many trigger happy chairmen around.rob63 wrote:No, we appear to have a gap between the ages of 19-25, Taylor excepted. Does seem to require some investment