BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Hi All, I know there is another thread for "Transfer Rumours" which should have been exactly that, but it has descended in to the usual trash talk, so in an effort to try and separate the wheat from the chaff so we have a go to section for those who have minimal time while at work to catch up with all things BFC related, and use this forum as the go to source of information, can we please keep this thread clean and concise and possibly use the already recognised but abused thread for discussion thereafter? Mods delete if you feel not required, no problem just hard to pick out a good post in the other thread at the moment.
These 14 users liked this post: claretgoss Bosscat FactualFrank Vegas Claret Claret-On-A-T-Rex CombatClaret yosserhughes Firthy bobinho whiffa maidenover rob63 Hedontplayforyou Southernclaret
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Ill start with a couple of links although not the most reliable, and sometimes I do think its source is this forum, but we can then gauge how reliable after the fact...
Harrison Reed
https://www.mediareferee.com/2019/06/06 ... ld-agreed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dawson and Jay Rod as we know..
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport/fo ... -1-9806442" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Harrison Reed
https://www.mediareferee.com/2019/06/06 ... ld-agreed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dawson and Jay Rod as we know..
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport/fo ... -1-9806442" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Linked to Dael Fry of Middlesbrough.
![Image](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Wakerlink.jpg/170px-Wakerlink.jpg)
![Image](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Wakerlink.jpg/170px-Wakerlink.jpg)
Last edited by Imploding Turtle on Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 5 users liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex HieronymousBoschHobs CombatClaret Squarepusher whiffa
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/f ... d-16377089" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 users liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex ClaretAL
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... a-samatta/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 users liked this post: ClaretAL FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 603 times
- Has Liked: 420 times
BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
If you would like to post any opinions about the current transfer window feel free to do so here.
I would actively encourage posters to contribute to the BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK) thread in accordance with the outline in the initial post by ClaretAL.
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboar ... =2&t=39709" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Having two threads will make it easier for people to access information in the format that they are most comfortable with. They can peruse the clear and concise links to the articles highlighted in ClaretAL's thread and discuss them here, or spin off any general thoughts about transfers, instead of cluttering up that thread and diminishing its usefulness.
I would actively encourage posters to contribute to the BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK) thread in accordance with the outline in the initial post by ClaretAL.
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboar ... =2&t=39709" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Having two threads will make it easier for people to access information in the format that they are most comfortable with. They can peruse the clear and concise links to the articles highlighted in ClaretAL's thread and discuss them here, or spin off any general thoughts about transfers, instead of cluttering up that thread and diminishing its usefulness.
-
- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
I've cleaned this up for you, ClaretAL
These 6 users liked this post: Long Time Lurker ClaretAL claretgoss Steve-Harpers-perm Buxtonclaret Bertiebeehead
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
I will definitely be posting in the MUST CONTAIN LINK thread with the random twaddle i find here, but i'll link to it so it'll be OK.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
Looking at the Jay Rod link and the Blades now in the race, who you would feel we would be 6 pointing against this season, who could offer more in wages, and who would be more attractive. I get all the sentiment around family and him coming through the ranks here, but in the short career of a footballer i would think money talks.
https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/t ... y-16393509
https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/t ... y-16393509
-
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 603 times
- Has Liked: 420 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
I think he could be more likely to go to Sheffield than us, based upon their existing strikers and the potential to grab a decent amount of playing time. £5m this year and another £5m in twelve months would fit within their rumoured £20m transfer kitty and unlike us they could benefit from adding some Premier League experience to their squad.ClaretAL wrote:Looking at the Jay Rod link and the Blades now in the race, who you would feel we would be 6 pointing against this season, who could offer more in wages, and who would be more attractive. I get all the sentiment around family and him coming through the ranks here, but in the short career of a footballer i would think money talks.
https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/t ... y-16393509
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... e-release/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think the blades are also rumoured to be interested in McBurnie who would be a bit of a risk and Maupay who would swallow up all of their budget. I'm not even sure how good Maupay would be in a framework other than Brentfords, which seems to suit him very well.
£5m would be a snip for Jay, but £10m is a touch on the pricey side and it would place his transfer fee in line with other alternatives. I'm also a bit uncomfortable with the idea of boosting our twilight contingent further, which could mean we have to replace a large chunk of the team at the same time. That would be financially testing if the players within that group leave on free transfers at the end of their contracts or for little money.
-
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5560 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
This board will be hilarious if we miss out on players to Sheffield United.
This user liked this post: Damo
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
,TheFamilyCat wrote:This board will be hilarious if we miss out on players to Sheffield United.
Yes you'll get a kicking for a start!
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
I tend to agree,but it is all about opinionsLong Time Lurker wrote:I think he could be more likely to go to Sheffield than us, based upon their existing strikers and the potential to grab a decent amount of playing time. £5m this year and another £5m in twelve months would fit within their rumoured £20m transfer kitty and unlike us they could benefit from adding some Premier League experience to their squad.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... e-release/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think the blades are also rumoured to be interested in McBurnie who would be a bit of a risk and Maupay who would swallow up all of their budget. I'm not even sure how good Maupay would be in a framework other than Brentfords, which seems to suit him very well.
£5m would be a snip for Jay, but £10m is a touch on the pricey side and it would place his transfer fee in line with other alternatives. I'm also a bit uncomfortable with the idea of boosting our twilight contingent further, which could mean we have to replace a large chunk of the team at the same time. That would be financially testing if the players within that group leave on free transfers at the end of their contracts or for little money.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Wasn't there a rumour of visa problems with Samatta in the last transfer window? He hadn't played enough internationals for Tanzania or something.Reecey1987 wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... a-samatta/
Natural goalscorer with good commitment looked good for a couple of seasons now ........ earlier this season he nutted a post chasing a ball, laid himself spark out- I was surprised when they let him continue.
-
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 603 times
- Has Liked: 420 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
David Turnbull
Celtic are moving quick for Turnbull - one of the rising stars of Scottish football - with reportedly nine other clubs showing interest, including Premier League sides Southampton and Burnley.
https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football ... -1-4942071" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Celtic are moving quick for Turnbull - one of the rising stars of Scottish football - with reportedly nine other clubs showing interest, including Premier League sides Southampton and Burnley.
https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football ... -1-4942071" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: ClaretAL
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Birmingham Live saying they believe a bid from Burnley for Che Adams "could be imminent"
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/ ... s-16398545" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://twitter.com/briandick/status/11 ... 8494322688" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/ ... s-16398545" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://twitter.com/briandick/status/11 ... 8494322688" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 3 users liked this post: FactualFrank randomclaret2 ClaretAL
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Just seen its already posted. Ignore.
Che Adams again. Link talks about off loading Vydra and Wells too. No surprises in this one.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/ ... m-16401510" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Che Adams again. Link talks about off loading Vydra and Wells too. No surprises in this one.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/ ... m-16401510" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 67895
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32545 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Selling Vydra & Wells to fund signings of Adams & Rodriguez
Alan Nixon
https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 70055?s=21" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alan Nixon
https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 70055?s=21" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 404 times
- Has Liked: 374 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 70055?s=19" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Wood Barnes Adams Rodriguez would make for a decent strike force
Wood Barnes Adams Rodriguez would make for a decent strike force
This user liked this post: whiffa
-
- Posts: 18097
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It's not unexpected that we try and sell Wells and Vydra to fund Jay Rod and Che Adams.
Once Dyche identifies a target he stays with it.
Once Dyche identifies a target he stays with it.
-
- Posts: 12371
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
If we pulled off replacing Vydra and Wells with Adams and Jay that would be amazing.ArmchairDetective wrote:https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 70055?s=19
Wood Barnes Adams Rodriguez would make for a decent strike force
I think you would see a lot more from players like Cork, Brady and JBG if Adams and Jay played as we wouldnt be as reliant on lumping it to Barnes and Wood every game
-
- Posts: 67895
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32545 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
Already posted on the links thread. Best to merge the two threads.ArmchairDetective wrote:https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 70055?s=19
Wood Barnes Adams Rodriguez would make for a decent strike force
The only reason the other thread was removed was because two posters decided to use it as their own personal battle ground.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Having Wells and Vydra to offer to Championship clubs as part of any deal could be quite handy for us. On the other hand I'm not sure how we'd keep 4 forwards like Barnes, Wood, Jay and Adams all happy. Dyche isn't exactly famous for rotating his squad or being willing to try new things is he? Maybe if he had 4 strikers he liked and trusted he might be willing to give them all a fair go.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Wells probably isn't worth much, we paid 5m for him and that was over the top.jrgbfc wrote:Having Wells and Vydra to offer to Championship clubs as part of any deal could be quite handy for us. On the other hand I'm not sure how we'd keep 4 forwards like Barnes, Wood, Jay and Adams all happy. Dyche isn't exactly famous for rotating his squad or being willing to try new things is he? Maybe if he had 4 strikers he liked and trusted he might be willing to give them all a fair go.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
You are only 1 injury or suspension off trouble in this league if goals dry up, I'd much prefer to have 4 on the books capable of getting a dozen goals at this level.jrgbfc wrote:Having Wells and Vydra to offer to Championship clubs as part of any deal could be quite handy for us. On the other hand I'm not sure how we'd keep 4 forwards like Barnes, Wood, Jay and Adams all happy. Dyche isn't exactly famous for rotating his squad or being willing to try new things is he? Maybe if he had 4 strikers he liked and trusted he might be willing to give them all a fair go.
Also those 2 will certainly give us a different options to pick horses for courses rather than literally having to pick the same 2 regardless of opposition, form or niggling injuries.
And the 2 players in question can play in multiple roles/positions and are a upgrade on the 2 mentioned to depart.
Also who knows, we might have a fair crack at the cup competitions.
I'd be delighted if we got Adams and Jay and offloaded Wells and Vydra , although I'd have liked to have judged the latter after a good run in the side, although theres obviously something not quite right somewhere.
I think it'll all come out in the wash over the summer
Last edited by MACCA on Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: MG70
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
I agree with you, but I think once Dyche has his settled starting XI/partnerships then he seems to want to stick with it come hell or high water. Would certainly keep Barnes and Wood on their toes if we had Rodriguez and Adams waiting in the wings.MACCA wrote:You are only 1 injury or suspension off trouble in this league if goals dry up, I'd much prefer to have 4 on the books capable of getting a dozen goals at this level.
Also those 2 will certainly give us a different options to pick horses for courses rather than literally having to pick the same 2 regardless of opposition, form or niggling injuries.
And the 2 players in question can play in multiple ropes/positions and are a upgrade on the 2 mentioned to depart.
Also who knows, we might have a fair crack at the cup comps.
I'd be delighted if we got Adams and Jay and offloaded Wells and Vydra , although us have liked to have judged the latter after a good run in the side, although theres obviously something not quite right somewhere.
I think itll all come out in the wash over the summer
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
We'll sell Wells and Vydra to free funds (that we didn't spend last year), to then miss out on Jay and Che because other teams will have already signed them.
It's the Burnley way.
It's the Burnley way.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Jay and Adams can also play out wide in a 3, so can allow for a 451/433 system, something none of our current 4 can do.jrgbfc wrote:I agree with you, but I think once Dyche has his settled starting XI/partnerships then he seems to want to stick with it come hell or high water. Would certainly keep Barnes and Wood on their toes if we had Rodriguez and Adams waiting in the wings.
Also with Adams, we get some pace into the front line too.
I think it'd be a great front 4, with all of them offering something different individually and as partnerships
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
I’m not sure that freeing funds would be the main driver, perhaps more, freeing up space (though of course money in, wouldn’t go amiss).Steddyman wrote:We'll sell Wells and Vydra to free funds (that we didn't spend last year), to then miss out on Jay and Che because other teams will have already signed them.
It's the Burnley way.
Wood, Adams, Barnes and Rodriguez would provide plenty of options.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It would provide plenty of options. The reason we will need to sell before buying is to free wages.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Agree with that to a degree, but we need to start being a little more bold and take a few chancesSteddyman wrote:It would provide plenty of options. The reason we will need to sell before buying is to free wages.
In the market.
This user liked this post: Carnsmerry12
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
[quote="ewanrob"]Agree with that to a degree, but we need to start being a little more bold and take a few chances
In the market.[/quote
Bold? Bold?......sorry I thought this was a Burnley messageboard
In the market.[/quote
Bold? Bold?......sorry I thought this was a Burnley messageboard
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Buy a pacy striker to replace another pacy striker.
Weird.
Weird.
-
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
The last thing we want to be doing is taking risks in the transfer market. I would be very happy if we got Adams, Rodriguez, Dawson and Jonjo Shelvey. All solid investments.
-
- Posts: 5543
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2340 times
- Has Liked: 1405 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Darnhill Claret wrote:The last thing we want to be doing is taking risks in the transfer market. I would be very happy if we got Adams, Rodriguez, Dawson and Jonjo Shelvey. All solid investments.
Where have you got shelvey from?
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Defensive midfielder needed probably more than anything. Hopefully some links soon.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 546 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Wood Barnes Adams and Rodriguez would be fantastic to pick from as a precious poster alluded to, they all bring something different to the table as individuals, and would do as different pairings also.
I do think we have to move with haste to get these deals done if true, as both players will/do have plenty of other suitors.
As far as Wells and Vydra are concerned, Wells has no future here and would be a decent bargaining chip for a club in the Championship who’s player we may fancy (Adams perhaps) and Vydra hasn’t been utilised since he joined and if that’s the way it’s going to continue then to sell him and free up his wages and a fee in would be the best thing to do . Offer him to Leeds in part exchange for Phillips if we are being cheeky !
I do think we have to move with haste to get these deals done if true, as both players will/do have plenty of other suitors.
As far as Wells and Vydra are concerned, Wells has no future here and would be a decent bargaining chip for a club in the Championship who’s player we may fancy (Adams perhaps) and Vydra hasn’t been utilised since he joined and if that’s the way it’s going to continue then to sell him and free up his wages and a fee in would be the best thing to do . Offer him to Leeds in part exchange for Phillips if we are being cheeky !
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (RAMBLING TWADDLE)
Especially if it's one of our ownTheFamilyCat wrote:This board will be hilarious if we miss out on players to Sheffield United.
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Nixon says we’re looking for about £10m for Vydra. Also says we’re looking for a sale specifically over a loan.
https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 54247?s=21" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://twitter.com/reluctantnicko/stat ... 54247?s=21" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/t ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
ghandhisflipflop, I added Shelvey because if we have a missing link it is a player who can unlock a defence with either a short or long pass. So for me that is a ‘Shelvey type’. That being the case I can’t think of anyone better and he is often left out by Rafa. He also fits my ‘no risk’ policy. Also seemed to have reduced his silly, niggly tackles last season.
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2473 times
- Has Liked: 2010 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Johnjo Kenny can be crossed off some lists. He’s signed, on loan, for Schalke, under Wagner.
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
If jayrod is available for £5m and we bid £16m for the same player last year, what on earth can hold this up?
Plus, why not use some of the money saved to get Adams over the line?
Please, just for once, f**kin get on with it!
Plus, why not use some of the money saved to get Adams over the line?
Please, just for once, f**kin get on with it!
This user liked this post: gandhisflipflop
-
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
He's likely on holiday, other clubs will be interested. I don't know 100% as I have never been involved in transfer dealings but I would think it is a little more complicated than on Champ manager where you can get a transfer done in 5 minutes. There will be negotiations over all sorts of insignificant things that us outside the game will likely not even have considered would make up a deal (both with clubs and players)scouseclaret wrote:If jayrod is available for £5m and we bid £16m for the same player last year, what on earth can hold this up?
Plus, why not use some of the money saved to get Adams over the line?
Please, just for once, f**kin get on with it!
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
It's not a case of if we want him but does he want us ?scouseclaret wrote:If jayrod is available for £5m and we bid £16m for the same player last year, what on earth can hold this up?
Plus, why not use some of the money saved to get Adams over the line?
Please, just for once, f**kin get on with it!
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5660 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
He will go to whoever offers him the most money
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Personal terms had supposedly been agreed last year as he wanted to come back to us - just that the price WBA were asking for was the stumbling block
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2473 times
- Has Liked: 2010 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Leicester Mercury saying Leicester are in competition with Sheff Utd & Norwich for JRod.
They would blow us out of the water regarding salary.
They would blow us out of the water regarding salary.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Burnley will look to sell striking pair Matej Vydra and Nahki Wells in order to fund a move for Birmingham City star Che Adams.
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport/fo ... -1-9812567" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport/fo ... -1-9812567" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
I think we already knew that . We sold vokes aswell so that gives us a better chance of landing adams and jay rod without really breaking the bankFactualFrank wrote:Burnley will look to sell striking pair Matej Vydra and Nahki Wells in order to fund a move for Birmingham City star Che Adams.
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport/fo ... -1-9812567" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;