Re: BFC TRANSFER NEWS (MUST CONTAIN LINK)
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:14 pm
We did play more attacking football last season, as evidenced by the fact we scored more goals than we have done in any other PL season.
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=39709
I left on 87min and Josh hardly had a touch. Today was my 1st pre season game and I wanted a look at Josh, unfortunately he only got the last 20 and his contribution was minimal.Steddyman wrote:Josh Benson looked some player when he came on today. I'd like to see more of this lad.
ClaretAndJew wrote:Daily Mail reporting Camarassa to Palace is almost done with a loan deal initially then permanent if they stay up. They are also looking at getting Cahill and McCarthy
Top Claret wrote:We struggle to complete with the London clubs for wages and location when trying to sign a foreigner
Well I can't see us letting Tarkowski go if we can't get as good as a replacement as Cahill!ClaretAndJew wrote:Daily Mail reporting Camarassa to Palace is almost done with a loan deal initially then permanent if they stay up. They are also looking at getting Cahill and McCarthy
The list also includes Orient and Millwall.Top Claret wrote:We struggle to complete with the London clubs for wages and location when trying to sign a foreigner
Kev just gets on with the job and has been an excellent servant to BFC. I think now is the time he moves on to pasture new. Forest would be an excellent move for him
Agree we definitely need a midfielder and I’ll be disappointed if we don’t bring one in this week which we’ll probably have to break our record for and recruitment seems to be a continued problem from the outside.Devils_Advocate wrote:Progression after that season for me would have been able to play a little more attacking football (like we did before Defour & Brady got injured) whilst comfortably being a 10th-15th team
What we ended up was a side fighting to survive and having to resort to the backs to the wall and boot it up to two big men style that we used successively to stay up the first time
That to me was a step backwards born out of two poor transfer windows. If we dont get a good centre midfielder I think we've stalled again and will spend another season just trying to keep 3 teams below us.
Luckily we have a manager who gets so much out of the players he's got he covers over the cracks from our recent poor recruitment and I think he will keep us up again. That said after the freakish season of coming 7th I feel the club missed a good opportunity to build on it
Finally regardless of the above comments the fact that we are even competing in this league is a miracle and something I am very thankful and appreciative of but that doesnt mean we cant criticise and highlight things we feel could improve us
I dont disagree and without doubt there's a balance between the more extreme and over the top views of both sides but messageboards by their nature bring those more extreme views to the forefrontSteve-Harpers-perm wrote:Agree we definitely need a midfielder and I’ll be disappointed if we don’t bring one in this week which we’ll probably have to break our record for and recruitment seems to be a continued problem from the outside.
Considering the start to last season the way we finished was amazing. Agree we’d all like to see more free flowing football but some posters on here give Dyche absolutely zero credit for example out 7th place finish was a ‘fluke’. They’ll have been similar Stoke, West Brom, Charlton fans demanding better football and reaching the ‘next level’ after a few years in the top flight.
Fingers crossed for a good season!Devils_Advocate wrote:I dont disagree and without doubt there's a balance between the more extreme and over the top views of both sides but messageboards by their nature bring those more extreme views to the forefront
I was trying to articulate that there's a reasonable school of thought around progression from coming 7th that didn't mean getting into the top 6 and didn't mean becoming the next Portsmouth or Bolton and that just maybe we didnt build on it as good as we could have done
I like focus on the areas I think we can do better because thats what matters more to me but Im forever labeled as negative or a moaner or even a troll which dissuades me from trying to have sensible discussion about Burnely on here
You must have been watching the wrong player then. His very first touch was to nip in ahead of a Parma player who looked a dead cert to receive it and almost create a scoring chance. He was quick to the ball all over.Top Claret wrote:I left on 87min and Josh hardly had a touch. Today was my 1st pre season game and I wanted a look at Josh, unfortunately he only got the last 20 and his contribution was minimal.
The reason you are sometimes looked on as a moaner and a troll is because sometimes you take your persona as "Devil's advocate" to mean that you will oppose the majority just for the sake of it. That isn't what a Devil's Advocate does - specifically, he makes the rational arguments against the prospective Pope (not Nick!) so that cardinals minded to vote for him can know that their reasons have been tested. The Devil's Advocate doesn't just say "he is popular, so I'm against" - he has to have valid reasons. So often you appear to oppose just for the sake of it.Devils_Advocate wrote:I like focus on the areas I think we can do better because thats what matters more to me but Im forever labeled as negative or a moaner or even a troll which dissuades me from trying to have sensible discussion about Burnely on here
Your entitled to your opinion and Im not gonna get into a discussion about my persona on a messageboard apart from that people really do get hung up on my username too much and if you ever come back at me to disagree with my post on its merit rather than just trying to argue against me the person I'll always try and have a sensible and respectful debatedsr wrote:The reason you are sometimes looked on as a moaner and a troll is because sometimes you take your persona as "Devil's advocate" to mean that you will oppose the majority just for the sake of it. That isn't what a Devil's Advocate does - specifically, he makes the rational arguments against the prospective Pope (not Nick!) so that cardinals minded to vote for him can know that their reasons have been tested. The Devil's Advocate doesn't just say "he is popular, so I'm against" - he has to have valid reasons. So often you appear to oppose just for the sake of it.
And because some of your posts are obvious wind-ups, then the rest of them come under suspicion too.
burnmark wrote:Nixon reckons no more interest in Tarkowski so won’t pursue Cahill who’ll go to Palace for £75k a week (which would have ruled us out anyway!)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
MDWat wrote:Yet Rob Dorsett, who knows everything Leicester, says the two they’re considering to replace Maguire and Nathan Ake and...James Tarkowski
Did he pull his hammy going for his halftime brewHedontplayforyou wrote:Midfielder needed desperately , when Cork went down today it was almost down to two!
Defour was in the Longside today in the first half, possibly testing out his new seat
Not sure but he didn't make it back for the second half so the steepness of the steps might have worried himTHEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Did he pull his hammy going for his halftime brew
Our second feeder club!Grumps wrote:Mr nixon says we're after Phillips at leeds
We do have Leeds on speed dial, and there might be a chance if they want VydraGrumps wrote:Mr nixon says we're after Phillips at leeds
They don'tBigvince wrote:We do have Leeds on speed dial, and there might be a chance if they want Vydra
Blyclaret wrote:Its looking very like that we have to sell before we can buy.
Who did we sell to buy Gibson, Vydra and Hart?Blyclaret wrote:Any of our recent purchases involves selling a player first.
Leeds want 30 millionGranny WeatherWax wrote:Phillips at Leeds. Now there’s an exciting link. Pity he will cost £20m
burnmark wrote:Nixon reckons no more interest in Tarkowski so won’t pursue Cahill who’ll go to Palace for £75k a week (which would have ruled us out anyway!)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
AndyClaret wrote:£15M plus Vydra should do it.
And a unicorncreepingdeath wrote:What happens if phillips wants a 4 year deal on 100k a week with no salary reduction on relegation? Things aren’t that simple
joey13 wrote:And a unicorn
I think we must already have agreed a deal with him, otherwise no point negotiating with the club if we can't meet his demands.creepingdeath wrote:What happens if phillips wants a 4 year deal on 100k a week with no salary reduction on relegation? Things aren’t that simple
I think its fair to say if a player looks like leaving we dont want to bring in the replacement till the sale is complete however I dont think we need to sell to buy. If we find a midfielder that is the right fit at the right price I dont think we'll have to sell anyone before Dyche is able to make the dealBlyclaret wrote:Vokes / Jay Rod
Heaton / Bailley Peacock Farrell