Damo wrote:I'm not sure why you start so many threads on these subjects, if peoples replies anger you to the point of name calling and swearing.
I said you are ****. "Poo" would be the unfiltered version of what i said. That's not name calling. If i said you were bad at something would that be name-calling?
What link between "Robinson" and Stutchbury dont you understand given my first post on the subject?
I'll help, both "Robinson" and Stutchbury have recently asked their army of cyber activists for money because their particular fight is expensive and doesn't pay well.
I'm sure you can testify on behalf of both of them, that sitting around the house all day, arguing with people on the internet instead of going to work isn't especially rewarding, financially.
Yet both of them want other people to fund their existence
Finally an answer, and as expected it is indeed a false equivalence.
Robinson scams his donors by requesting money for his cause and then buying himself nice things with it. How else could he afford his nice big, expensive house?
In what way has Stuchbury similarly scammed his donors?
In what way is this guy prosecuting Johnson similarly scamming his donors?
The truth? As far as you are aware, they aren't. And you know that. There's a reason you didn't set your equivalence test at how the money was being spent and instead set it as the fact that the money was being raised at all. Which means you're saying that ANY person or organisation who crowdfunds is equal to Tommy Robinson. I'll remember that when Poppy Day comes along because apparently, according to you, the Royal British Legion and Tommy Robinson are the same.