I genuinely appreciate the dialogue CT, so forgive me if I go astray.ClaretTony wrote:No inference that it wouldn't be safe, but that building regs wouldn't allow it now.
As for incentives to the cricket club, I'm not sure how much land you could take from them before it has a damaging effect on their ground. We bought some extra land off them to build the current cricket field stand which goes further back than the old covered terrace did.
Why wouldn't building regs allow it now? I would think that had something to do with safety, rather than aesthetics.
Enough land to make the cricket club relocate...through incentivisation, not bullying.
UTC!