Imploding Turtle wrote:In fact it's going to bug me if i don't point out how ******* moronic some of these questions are.
1. There shouldn't be a limit on the number of people who enter legally.
2. Yes. No one is saying otherwise.
3. This is the most stupid question of the lot, because it shows that you have completely failed in understanding what's going on even when i've explained it to you in the most simple of terms. What's the issue with the US stopping them before they reach the US? Well, it means they can't ******* enter legally doesn't it? If they arrive at a port of entry then they're trying to enter legally, and the US illegally holds them on Mexican soil then then the US is making it impossible for asylum seekers and refugees to enter illegally.
They're not stopping illegal immigrants. They're stopping legal ones.
4. Roll back everything Trump has done. These concentration camps didn't exist before his presidency because there wasn't a crisis until he created one.
How do you know they're stopping legal immigrants?
If they're legal they'll have all the correct paperwork and be allowed through.
If they don't have it, then they're turned back.
Or is one of us missing something?
You're targeting the US alone when Mexico and others aren't doing enough, but you don't mention them.
Why shouldn't there be a limit on legal migration?
Why are you objecting so much to them stopping illegal migration?
As for the crisis not happening until Trump took office, is that because no previous president decided to take a handle on the situation to stop it, or is it because things in South America have gotten worse?
If things have gotten worse in S.America are you blaming Trump for that?
If he's the only president to try and stem the flow is that his fault or the fault of others, because illegal migration into the US via the southern border has always been an issue.