England v New Zealand

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:20 pm

Looked to me as if it might have been going over

Vino blanco
Posts: 2635
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 660 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:20 pm

Good captaincy to bring Wood back on then. England bowling well.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:21 pm

Def missing

Longside4evr
Posts: 2506
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 263 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Longside4evr » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:21 pm

Yes same as when Bairstow went

claretburns
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
Been Liked: 154 times
Has Liked: 86 times
Location: Halifax

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by claretburns » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:22 pm

MACCA wrote:Get them 150/4 and it's back with us.

It was a massive noise, I heard it from here.
You got your wish MACCA, 9 runs early as well.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:22 pm

Another bad decision but good for us for a change

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:22 pm

Not out had they had their review

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 9092
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2216 times
Has Liked: 4176 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:23 pm

Still think one review is wrong.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:24 pm

Swings and roundabouts but proof again that you can never get 100% decisions correct in live sport.

Chester Perry
Posts: 7949
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 1098 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Chester Perry » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:25 pm

diamondpocket wrote:only available to UK viewers, I'm not in the UK
it is on http://www.cricfree.sc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:25 pm

Tbh you can’t feel too sorry for them when Williamson doesn’t walk when he knows he’s hit it

box_of_frogs
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
Been Liked: 650 times
Has Liked: 678 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by box_of_frogs » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:27 pm

Buxtonclaret wrote:Still think one review is wrong.
I quite like just the 1 review. Stops frivolous reviewing! You need to think about them!

MACCA
Posts: 11375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 2925 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by MACCA » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:28 pm

Buxtonclaret wrote:Still think one review is wrong.

Start having 2 or 3 and you may as well have an umpire.

I think ones enough and its upto the captain to use it wisely. NZ have been a bit sloppy with their batting one against us in both games now.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:29 pm

There should be some penalty for frivolous reviews. However, you want to get decisions correct.

MACCA
Posts: 11375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 2925 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by MACCA » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:30 pm

claretburns wrote:You got your wish MACCA, 9 runs early as well.

I can be greedy and ask for 190/6?

I can't see them getting 250 TBH.
These 2 users liked this post: box_of_frogs claretburns

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:45 pm

Another for Plunkett

173/5

claretburns
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
Been Liked: 154 times
Has Liked: 86 times
Location: Halifax

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by claretburns » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:45 pm

Plunkett with another, he really is good at claiming wickets, a very much unsung hero in the squad.

Longside4evr
Posts: 2506
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 263 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Longside4evr » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:46 pm

Still a long way to go but that's what the doctor ordered

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:46 pm

Great stuff

RVclaret
Posts: 886
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 188 times
Has Liked: 55 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by RVclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:47 pm

Another quick one here and we could limit them to 230.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 374 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:50 pm

Bairstow is a beast on the boundary. Great fielder

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:51 pm

Every time I think NZ might be edging in front we take a wicket

WestMidsClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
Been Liked: 506 times
Has Liked: 466 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by WestMidsClaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:55 pm

Well bowled plunks.

box_of_frogs
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
Been Liked: 650 times
Has Liked: 678 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by box_of_frogs » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:55 pm

ClaretTony wrote:Every time I think NZ might be edging in front we take a wicket
Best you keep thinking it then.......!

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 9092
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2216 times
Has Liked: 4176 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:57 pm

Superb 10 overs, Liam.

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:11 pm

Just reaching the point again where we need another wicket

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:23 pm

Six down, de Grandhomne gone

MACCA
Posts: 11375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 2925 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by MACCA » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:24 pm

ClaretTony wrote:Just reaching the point again where we need another wicket
There you go

Longside4evr
Posts: 2506
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 263 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Longside4evr » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:25 pm

That's was needed we didn't need that partnership to carry through
We can do this now
230 240 if they lucky

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:30 pm

Longside4evr wrote:That's was needed we didn't need that partnership to carry through
We can do this now
230 240 if they lucky
We don’t want them getting many more than 240. That would potentially be a tough target.

claret wizard
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 143 times
Has Liked: 61 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by claret wizard » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:32 pm

270 is the par score at Lords.

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:34 pm

claret wizard wrote:270 is the par score at Lords.
Not in these conditions though. 270 for me would be a frightening total to go for.

Bosscat
Posts: 7619
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 2284 times
Has Liked: 6104 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Bosscat » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:34 pm

Woakes just went from the Ridiculous to the Sublime ....

4 wides followed by a wicket 232-7

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 20121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5481 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Imploding Turtle » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:35 pm

Someone who knows about cricket, why does it matter that a ball pitches outside the stumps for LBW if it would still hit the wickets anyway?

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:35 pm

Interesting over with 5 wides, a wicket , free hit no ball and then nothing off the free hit.

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:36 pm

238 with one over to go

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:37 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Someone who knows about cricket, why does it matter that a ball pitches outside the stumps for LBW if it would still hit the wickets anyway?
Can’t be out if it pitches outside leg stump.

MACCA
Posts: 11375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 2925 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by MACCA » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:39 pm

A sloppy last 3 overs there's 20 on this total that shouldn't be.

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:40 pm

240/8 with 3 balls to go. First wicket for Archer.

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:40 pm

Brendan McCullum happy with 240.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 20121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5481 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Imploding Turtle » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:42 pm

ClaretTony wrote:Can’t be out if it pitches outside leg stump.

Ok. yes. I understand that bit, but why? I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the rule.

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:43 pm

Finished on 241/8

Vino blanco
Posts: 2635
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 660 times

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:45 pm

I think the theory is that if the ball pitches outside leg stump, the trajectory of the ball is likely (possibly) to be in line to hit the leg anyway before the batsman has time to move his bat towards the ball.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:46 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Ok. yes. I understand that bit, but why? I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the rule.
If it was allowed it would be far to easy for a bowler to get an lbw if bowling over the wicket to a left hander or round the wicket to a right hander.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 9092
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2216 times
Has Liked: 4176 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:49 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Ok. yes. I understand that bit, but why? I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the rule.
Would just make it too easy for the bowler if out pitching outside leg stump.
Makes sense really, if you think about it.

Beat me to it. :)
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

LeadBelly
Posts: 2188
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:07 am
Been Liked: 598 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: North Hampshire

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by LeadBelly » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:50 pm

A competitive total I think; if NZ bowl well it wont be a doddle chasing that down.
England bowled OK without it being at their best; 17 wides is too many.
England are strong favourites with the bookies (1/4 cf 3/1 for Kiwis) but a few early wickets would change that. All to play for still.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 20121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5481 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Imploding Turtle » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:53 pm

Vino blanco wrote:I think the theory is that if the ball pitches outside leg stump, the trajectory of the ball is likely (possibly) to be in line to hit the leg anyway before the batsman has time to move his bat towards the ball.
Oh. Right. So is that because of what side the bowler is bowling from? I mean, if the bowler is bowling from the left and the ball pitches to the left of the wickets the batsman can't be out, but if he's bowling from the left and pitches to the right of the wickets and comes "back" then LBW is possible?

Or must it pitch in-line with the wickets no matter what side of the the bowler's bowling from?

ClaretTony
Posts: 33500
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 15063 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:57 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Oh. Right. So is that because of what side the bowler is bowling from? I mean, if the bowler is bowling from the left and the ball pitches to the left of the wickets the batsman can't be out, but if he's bowling from the left and pitches to the right of the wickets and comes "back" then LBW is possible?

Or must it pitch in-line with the wickets no matter what side of the the bowler's bowling from?
Doesn’t have to pitch in line, can pitch outside off stump. Then it’s where the contact takes place dependent on whether the batsman is playing a shot.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

spadesclaret
Posts: 2804
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:57 pm
Been Liked: 1620 times
Has Liked: 2402 times
Location: Norfolk

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by spadesclaret » Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:08 pm

IT, here is all you need to know -


You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game
This user liked this post: JTClaret

Longside4evr
Posts: 2506
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 263 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: England v New Zealand

Post by Longside4evr » Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:12 pm

Here we go come on England

Post Reply