Well out of order.mybloodisclaret wrote:Go on then.... when was the last time you were stop searched? Or harassed by the police or "state"?
You know he has agoraphobia and is hidden in his safe room at the back of his closet.
Well out of order.mybloodisclaret wrote:Go on then.... when was the last time you were stop searched? Or harassed by the police or "state"?
The stop and search is just there to minimise the deaths of innocent bystanders whilst the nutters make there way to the designated combat zonesbfcjg wrote:TBH I would issue any nutter who wants to fight with another nutter a machete each and fight to the death.
No problem, I hope you live in a nice part.Cirrus_Minor wrote:Thank you for your feedback on your thoughts about the town that I live in.
Imagine if that was true. You'd be mocking someone for their mental illness.Bfcboyo wrote:Well out of order.
You know he has agoraphobia and is hidden in his safe room at the back of his closet.
I'd hang him for murder.DCWat wrote:Silly approach - that’d still leave one nutter
You must live somewhere significantly better than Burnley to say thatMACCA wrote:Absolute sh1t whole of a place, and only getting worse ( I know theres nice parts before people get upset )
I avoid the place unless it's absolutely necessary.
I have no problem with police officers having body cams - it can protect both the public from the police being a bit too far at times and also protect police officers in situations so it’s a win win really.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:With the introduction of body cameras on police officers these types of incidents will stop, because innocent people will have a right to complain.
Not aimed at you, but I'm assuming no one minds the police having cameras on them whilst on duty?
Rileybobs wrote:IT doesn’t need me to stick up for him, he’s a big boy. But some of you need to take a good look at yourselves because your behaviour cannot be described as anything other than bullying.
You may think he’s a dick but you’re the ones going around looking for confrontation with him and often starting provocative threads directed at him. You then ignore the content of the discussion and show your inability, or lack of intelligence to debate a point and resort immediately to personal attacks. You can mock IT by claiming that he lives in his mum’s attic but you need to ask how sad this constant harassment makes your lives look.
You are the true definition of keyboard warriors, ganging up and picking on another poster whilst using your internet anonymity to make yourself feel bigger. You’re cowards.
I don’t always agree with stuff IT says - but I do think he tries to give a valid debate on situations (whether you agree with his mean self or not). A lot of people on the witch hunt though and creaming their kecks when he replies to a postRileybobs wrote:IT doesn’t need me to stick up for him, he’s a big boy. But some of you need to take a good look at yourselves because your behaviour cannot be described as anything other than bullying.
You may think he’s a dick but you’re the ones going around looking for confrontation with him and often starting provocative threads directed at him. You then ignore the content of the discussion and show your inability, or lack of intelligence to debate a point and resort immediately to personal attacks. You can mock IT by claiming that he lives in his mum’s attic but you need to ask how sad this constant harassment makes your lives look.
You are the true definition of keyboard warriors, ganging up and picking on another poster whilst using your internet anonymity to make yourself feel bigger. You’re cowards.
Care to elaborate? In the 38 posts following IT’s first contribution, the following 6 posters personally attack IT, totally unprovoked and without adding anything to the subject being discussed;Bin Ont Turf wrote:
Deary me
Funny, I never see you jump to Ringos defence on the brexit threads.Rileybobs wrote:Care to elaborate? In the 38 posts following IT’s first contribution, the following 6 posters personally attack IT, totally unprovoked and without adding anything to the subject being discussed;
randomclaret2
Rumbletonk
Damo
Stayingup
Godisadeejay81
Bfcboyo
Not bullying?
Edit - make that 6, not 5.
You can't be that naiveRileybobs wrote:Care to elaborate? In the 38 posts following IT’s first contribution, the following 6 posters personally attack IT, totally unprovoked and without adding anything to the subject being discussed;
randomclaret2
Rumbletonk
Damo
Stayingup
Godisadeejay81
Bfcboyo
Not bullying?
Edit - make that 6, not 5.
Imagine if Tommy Robinson uttered those truthful words.CoolClaret wrote:Nelson/Brierfield are **** holes, there's no denying it.
Absolutely got your head in the sand if you also can't admit that most shenanigans that go on in the area are by Asian or Asian/English youths.
It's just the reality of the situation.
I'm regularly crossing swords with around 6 or more at a time on the Brexit thread. The Bunker Dwelling, Zero in a half shell if often at the front of the gaggle of remoaners. Nowt I can't cope with.Damo wrote:Funny, I never see you jump to Ringos defence on the brexit threads.
It's almost like you only want to defend people you personally agree with.
As for my contribution to this one, charlie regularly tries to involve me in threads that I have no intention of contributing to.
Though I, and probably he, isn't as sensitive as you clearly are
So what if you find him boring and childish? It’s perfectly possible to ignore him. On this thread, the 6 posters I have mentioned posted on this thread just to attack IT. They haven’t contributed to the discussion, they could have just stayed off the thread entirely.Bin Ont Turf wrote:Yes I'll elaborate. He's like a child who always has to have the last word. The, to me, to you chuckle brothers style is very boring and childish.
He treats this board like it is Reddit.
He never starts a thread to debate a subject, he does it to simply goad others.
Bullying? He's not a 13 year old girl.
Please also elaborate.Rumbletonk wrote:You can't be that naive
I can contribute if you'd like, an actual proper grown up contribution.Rileybobs wrote:So what if you find him boring and childish? It’s perfectly possible to ignore him. On this thread, the 6 posters I have mentioned posted on this thread just to attack IT. They haven’t contributed to the discussion, they could have just stayed off the thread entirely.
As for starting a thread to goad others - what about the OP in this instance? Constantly lighting a racially-motivated firecracker and stepping back. I don’t see the same people attacking him. Nor do I see the same posters condemning the other racist posts on this and other threads.
And are you seriously suggesting that you can only bully a 13 year old girl? At what age and gender does personal harassment stop become bullying?
I really don't give a sh1te one way or the other. You asked me to elaborate, so I did. I'm perfectly capable of ignoring him, and that's what I do for the most part.Rileybobs wrote:So what if you find him boring and childish? It’s perfectly possible to ignore him. On this thread, the 6 posters I have mentioned posted on this thread just to attack IT. They haven’t contributed to the discussion, they could have just stayed off the thread entirely.
As for starting a thread to goad others - what about the OP in this instance? Constantly lighting a racially-motivated firecracker and stepping back. I don’t see the same people attacking him. Nor do I see the same posters condemning the other racist posts on this and other threads.
And are you seriously suggesting that you can only bully a 13 year old girl? At what age and gender does personal harassment stop become bullying?
I live in Duke Bar . It's lovely here. I'm so glad I live far away from Nelson and brierfield and all those naughty Asians. My friend lives in Barrowford. Crikey they are on his doorstep.CoolClaret wrote:Nelson/Brierfield are **** holes, there's no denying it.
Absolutely got your head in the sand if you also can't admit that most shenanigans that go on in the area are by Asian or Asian/English youths.
It's just the reality of the situation.
If people should be able to find it "perfectly possible to ignore Imploding Turtle's Head." Then surely, others should find it just as perfectly possible to ignore what you describe as " racially motivated firecrackers "?Rileybobs wrote:So what if you find him boring and childish? It’s perfectly possible to ignore him. On this thread, the 6 posters I have mentioned posted on this thread just to attack IT. They haven’t contributed to the discussion, they could have just stayed off the thread entirely.
As for starting a thread to goad others - what about the OP in this instance? Constantly lighting a racially-motivated firecracker and stepping back. I don’t see the same people attacking him. Nor do I see the same posters condemning the other racist posts on this and other threads.
And are you seriously suggesting that you can only bully a 13 year old girl? At what age and gender does personal harassment stop become bullying?
Please provide an example of when i've called you a racist or a nazi. I'll wait.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:I can contribute if you'd like, an actual proper grown up contribution.
However, there's no point because what usually happens is people on here, like IT, will launch into a tirade where they're adamant that their point of view is right and no one else's is, I'll probably be called a racist, or a Nazi because that's happened before.
Also the thread I contributed to earlier today and haven't bothered commenting again because I've basically been accused of wanting genocide, which I pretty much knew would happen.
I didn’t bring up the goading threads, you did. So I don’t only see the ones I want to see and I’m not picking apart the OP here for another provocative race-related thread - I’m challenging the posters who follow another poster around this forum and continually harass them.Bin Ont Turf wrote:I really don't give a sh1te one way or the other. You asked me to elaborate, so I did. I'm perfectly capable of ignoring him, and that's what I do for the most part.
The goading threads are very boring whoever starts them. But you only seem to see the ones you want to see, or in this case, talk about the ones you want.
I'm sure he can cope with the 'bullying' but he'll be grateful for having a personal bodyguard.
And I’m sure many do. What’s your point? I don’t see people following Claretandy around this forum and personally abusing him on every thread despite his open racist views.RingoMcCartney wrote:If people should be able to find it "perfectly possible to ignore Imploding Turtle's Head." Then surely, others should find it just as perfectly possible to ignore what you describe as " racially motivated firecrackers "?
My point is. People could take your advice given for one poster and apply it to another.....Rileybobs wrote:And I’m sure many do. What’s your point? I don’t see people following Claretandy around this forum and personally abusing him on every thread despite his open racist views.
I’d rather people spoke up about the undercurrent of racism which is now commonplace on this messageboard. IT has got some pretty strong views but I’d like to think that most people would rather pick on the racist posters on this board if given the choice. Unfortunately that doesn’t seem the case.
I've been called a racist and Nazi on this forum, I didn't point that finger of blame at you, so calm down.Imploding Turtle wrote:Please provide an example of when i've called you a racist or a nazi. I'll wait.
And who said you wanted genocide? Provide a quote. (spoiler: no one)
Edit: It's this ******* post, isn't it?
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboar ... 0#p1050849" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What are my extremist views?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:I've been called a racist and Nazi on this forum, I didn't point that finger of blame at you, so calm down.
It isn't worth debating with you, you're an extremist on here with your views quite simply and that's why I've stopped bothering as much.
Extremist as in how you're seemingly an expert on everything, it's your view that's apparently always right, everyone who's not in line with your opinion is a moron etc.Imploding Turtle wrote:What are my extremist views?
I don’t follow. Which other poster gets a number of personal attacks totally unrelated to the subject in hand after posting a perfectly sensible point on a thread?RingoMcCartney wrote:My point is. People could take your advice given for one poster and apply it to another.....
You're wasting your time, Rileybobs. IT is very, very strongly in favour of personal insults being used on this board, and I very much doubt that anything you can say will change his mind.Rileybobs wrote:I don’t follow. Which other poster gets a number of personal attacks totally unrelated to the subject in hand after posting a perfectly sensible point on a thread?
imploding, you are a clever lad, you know certain things are worth pointing out, and that is admirable.Imploding Turtle wrote:What are my extremist views?
You have posted on most of the brexit threads where this has happened, so no doubt you have seen it.Rileybobs wrote:I don’t follow. Which other poster gets a number of personal attacks totally unrelated to the subject in hand after posting a perfectly sensible point on a thread?
Interesting. I suppose we might now find out whether a reported post provides a link to the original post, or the edited one. But I surely hope you get your wish and are banned from this forum.Imploding Turtle wrote:No, genius. I call peoples ideas stupid, moronic, imbecilic etc because people don't like it when i call them stupid, morons or imbeciles. Sometimes, quite rarely, i'll slip up and call someone an idiot or a moron. But it doesn't matter to people like you, because you see me calling your stupid ideas "stupid" and take that as if to mean i'm calling you stupid anyway, which is really ******* stupid.
This is my compromise. You didn't like it when i called you stupid, so i restrict myself to calling your ideas stupid, and you still get awfully offended. Tough ****.
What i won't do though is follow you around a message board and harass you, or try to encourage others into attacking you, or (and i honestly don't understand this one) spend parts of my day speculating as to your personal and private life for the purposes of ridicule. I won't discuss with others who you are or how to get your personal information, and i certainly won't post it on the forum for everyone to see in the hope that someone angrier than me will take that information and do what they do. And i won't wish you dead. But hey, i called your idea stupid and that's the exact same thing, eh? P*ss off, mate. Now, go get me banned again for telling you to p*ss off.
How many different people on here have you repeatedly accused of virtue-signalling?Damo wrote:You have posted on most of the brexit threads where this has happened, so no doubt you have seen it.
5 or 6 posters, rounding on one poster. Accusing him of being drunk. Changing a couple of letters in his username to turn it into something really childish etc.
You still bring up something I posted (almost 12 months later) where you misconstrued my point about my potential grandchildren.
Charlie was either trolling or virtue Signalling on this thread and didnt suffer anything worse than what several posters on here face when they post something you, and others consider not to be sensible.
Not that anyone else really cares. It just makes you look a bit daft when you get on your high horse about it
It doesn't matter. the original one said p*ss off too, bit it showed up as ****. The only reason I edited it was so that it is clear to you that you're reporting me for telling you to "p*ss off", which is what you've done.dsr wrote:Interesting. I suppose we might now find out whether a reported post provides a link to the original post, or the edited one. But I surely hope you get your wish and are banned from this forum.
Fair enough ; I didn't really expect you to be honest.theroyaldyche wrote:Machetes
Nope, live in Burnley.Rumbletonk wrote:You must live somewhere significantly better than Burnley to say that
CoolClaret wrote:Nelson/Brierfield are **** holes, there's no denying it.
Absolutely got your head in the sand if you also can't admit that most shenanigans that go on in the area are by Asian or Asian/English youths.
It's just the reality of the situation.
Nelson is a dump. A wastegroundMACCA wrote:You must live somewhere significantly better than Burnley to say that?
Oh no. I was honest alright in my OPevensteadiereddie wrote:Fair enough ; I didn't really expect you to be honest.
bfccrazy wrote:About 10/12 of us got asked to step outside after we’d gotten our first drinks and lined up by a pub on an away day a while ago b cause police thought somebody had a smoke bomb.
They searched us all and didn’t find a smoke bomb (or any other illegal objects) but decided the best course of action was to take our details and give us a 24 hour ban from the town centre (which we managed to argue was stupid because the train station was in the centre for us to get home later)
If that isn’t a pointless abuse of power then I don’t know what is.
Also had a mate who was walking to the ground at another game and happened to be going to the ground 10 minutes after some trouble (which he wasn’t part of) - he got stopped and searched by the police because they said they were had suspicion he had something he shouldn’t..... they found nothing but ripped up his ticket and told him to head home.
These sort of laws just give more power to police which are open to be abused - if you’re in a pub on an away day with people you don’t know but they are also Burnley fans, don’t complain when you get lumped in with them and expect to be searched and dealt with like you’re a criminal anyway.
Honest but not brave?theroyaldyche wrote:Oh no. I was honest alright in my OP
Damo wrote:You have posted on most of the brexit threads where this has happened, so no doubt you have seen it.
5 or 6 posters, rounding on one poster. Accusing him of being drunk. Changing a couple of letters in his username to turn it into something really childish etc.
You still bring up something I posted (almost 12 months later) where you misconstrued my point about my potential grandchildren.
Charlie was either trolling or virtue Signalling on this thread and didnt suffer anything worse than what several posters on here face when they post something you, and others consider not to be sensible.
Not that anyone else really cares. It just makes you look a bit daft when you get on your high horse about it
Yes it was. I found the ban from the centre an odd tactic to avoid trouble ....... because if we had wanted to cause trouble, they’d moved us from easily accessible areas which were full of cameras etc .... down to pubs in. Little alleyways etc away from the hustle and bustle Strange move.claretonthecoast1882 wrote:Was that at Huddersfield a few year back ?
Soup?bfccrazy wrote:Yes it was. I found the ban from the centre an odd tactic to avoid trouble ....... because if we had wanted to cause trouble, they’d moved us from easily accessible areas which were full of cameras etc .... down to pubs in. Little alleyways etc away from the hustle and bustle Strange move.
The mate got stopped at Wigan and had his ticket ripped up.