Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Having publicly named people under Parliamentary privilege it is time for Tom Watson to now publicly apologize and consider resigning.
His lack of judgement in this case is shocking.
A few posters on here might also want to consider publicly retracting their false beliefs and take cautionary counsel about declaring who is and isn't a child-abusing paedophile.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
His lack of judgement in this case is shocking.
A few posters on here might also want to consider publicly retracting their false beliefs and take cautionary counsel about declaring who is and isn't a child-abusing paedophile.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 users liked this post: AndyClaret lovebeingaclaret
-
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2327 times
- Has Liked: 2697 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Nothing much to see here...just Rowls' usual , Labour bad , Tory good chanting.
These 2 users liked this post: Stayingup Greenmile
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Both sides of this human tragedy are awful. Naming those who have done nothing wrong will not stop some not accepting what has gone before as false and those genuine victims of abuse who are not believed or who do not see any justice are in a similar situation. I bet Cliff Richard now has doubters just because of the crass way his arrest was aired.
I personally think it is an abuse of parliamentary privilege to behave the way Tom Watson behaved and his statement last night that he had nothing to apologise for makes him as arrogant as anyone in arroganteville (to paraphrase SD)
I personally think it is an abuse of parliamentary privilege to behave the way Tom Watson behaved and his statement last night that he had nothing to apologise for makes him as arrogant as anyone in arroganteville (to paraphrase SD)
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Politician names falsely accused paedophiles under Parliamentary privilege and you claim there is "nothing much to see"?fatboy47 wrote:Nothing much to see here...just Rowls' usual , Labour bad , Tory good chanting.
Do you know what happened to Harvey Proctor?
How would you feel if that happened to you? Or a close friend? Or a family member?
Do you know what the other falsely accused victims (and they are real victims, not fantasists) had to go through?
You can ignore it if you like fatboy, by all means, but you cannot dismiss it.
I think it is time for Tom Watson to apologize - and for him to do it as publicly and widely as he repeated the lies which he spread.
This user liked this post: mdd2
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Not Labour bad Tory good but Tom Watson bad some Tories (and Lord Jenner) dragged through the mud although Lord Jenner did have a legal case against him- but not sure if this was also down to Carl Beechfatboy47 wrote:Nothing much to see here...just Rowls' usual , Labour bad , Tory good chanting.
-
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2327 times
- Has Liked: 2697 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Never ignored issues like this Rowls, but unlike you I don't have an utterly one-sided view of life.
Corrupt politicians from all sides make me want to vomit.....not just the Labour ones.
Corrupt politicians from all sides make me want to vomit.....not just the Labour ones.
This user liked this post: mdd2
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Tom Watson didn’t name anyone in Parliament did he?
Zac Goldsmith has also been criticised by Proctor for his involvement but you haven’t mentioned that.
Zac Goldsmith has also been criticised by Proctor for his involvement but you haven’t mentioned that.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Rowls wrote:Having publicly named people under Parliamentary privilege it is time for Tom Watson to now publicly apologize and consider resigning.
His lack of judgement in this case is shocking.
A few posters on here might also want to consider publicly retracting their false beliefs and take cautionary counsel about declaring who is and isn't a child-abusing paedophile.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Just another reason why people accused of paedophilia should be allowed a fair trial, not compromised by prejudices or by violations of court orders.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Name them, or we're just going to assume you're making it up that some people might want have expressed beliefs that need retracting.Rowls wrote: A few posters on here might also want to consider publicly retracting their false beliefs and take cautionary counsel about declaring who is and isn't a child-abusing paedophile.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
martin_p wrote:Tom Watson didn’t name anyone in Parliament did he?
Zac Goldsmith has also been criticised by Proctor for his involvement but you haven’t mentioned that.
Shhhhhh. This is about the Labour party. If you want to start a thread about non-Labour party members who should apologise for nothing then start your own thread. This one is for Rowls to use victims of paedophilia for partisanship.
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Rowls doesn't think Zac Goldsmith is racist btw!martin_p wrote:Tom Watson didn’t name anyone in Parliament did he?
Zac Goldsmith has also been criticised by Proctor for his involvement but you haven’t mentioned that.
This user liked this post: Rowls
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I'm not going to name them.Imploding Turtle wrote:Name them, or we're just going to assume you're making it up that some people might want have expressed beliefs that need retracting.
They'll know who they are. Maybe some of them have already posted.
It's not really important that any posters on here retract posts that are now so old the old thread appears to have been archived.
But I think it's right that we reflect when we get things wrong. Particularly matters as important and life-destroying as this. People all too often leap to conclusions and then post them on the internet.
Nobody, myself included, is completely immune to this but this case was a stark incident of the practice.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
That is correct.Spijed wrote:Rowls doesn't think Zac Goldsmith is racist btw!
-
- Posts: 8529
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2473 times
- Has Liked: 2010 times
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I heard him after Lowrys win on Sunday and he was very complimentary. Fine player he was also.
These 2 users liked this post: rob63 Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I believe he may have done and it was he who effectively campaigned for the police to investigate this sham. Read the BBC article to see his involvement in this case.martin_p wrote:Tom Watson didn’t name anyone in Parliament did he?
Zac Goldsmith has also been criticised by Proctor for his involvement but you haven’t mentioned that.
I'm not very aware of what Zac Goldsmith did in relation to this shameful episode but I'll happily call for him to apologise too. He isn't mentioned in the BBC article. Tom Watson and his actions are referenced repeatedly.
Here it is again:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
This thread is about the public call for Tom Watson to apologize for his involvement in dragging innocent parties into false allegations of paedophilia.Imploding Turtle wrote:Shhhhhh. This is about the Labour party. If you want to start a thread about non-Labour party members who should apologise for nothing then start your own thread. This one is for Rowls to use victims of paedophilia for partisanship.
These accusations have had terrible effects on the lives of those who were falsely accused.
-
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 543 times
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
He named Leon Brittain.martin_p wrote:Tom Watson didn’t name anyone in Parliament did he?
Zac Goldsmith has also been criticised by Proctor for his involvement but you haven’t mentioned that.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
BTW: I'd like to say that I doubt very much that Tom Watson acted in bad faith, but I do think he acted with a complete disregard for the true victims of the lies which he spread and that he acted with a complete lack of judgement.
I also think that if he fails to publicly apologize for his actions then he will be shown to be completely without any honour whatsoever.
In vernacular speech - he screwed up as massively as is possible. It's time for him to say sorry. If he doesn't then he's a pr:ck.
I also think that if he fails to publicly apologize for his actions then he will be shown to be completely without any honour whatsoever.
In vernacular speech - he screwed up as massively as is possible. It's time for him to say sorry. If he doesn't then he's a pr:ck.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Yes he campaigned for the police to investigate historic sex abuse cases, including this one, which incidentally has led to three convictions, but you specifically accused him of using parliamentary privilege to name people in parliament. Your BBC article doesn’t say he did that so I assumed you must have some other evidence in order to make the accusation. Proctor revealed that he was being investigated himself https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.dail ... enies.htmlRowls wrote:I believe he may have done and it was he who effectively campaigned for the police to investigate this sham. Read the BBC article to see his involvement in this case.
I'm not very aware of what Zac Goldsmith did in relation to this shameful episode but I'll happily call for him to apologise too. He isn't mentioned in the BBC article. Tom Watson and his actions are referenced repeatedly.
Here it is again:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
No, that was the Sunday People.AndyClaret wrote:He named Leon Brittain.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Rowls wrote:I'm not going to name them.
They'll know who they are. Maybe some of them have already posted.
It's not really important that any posters on here retract posts that are now so old the old thread appears to have been archived.
But I think it's right that we reflect when we get things wrong. Particularly matters as important and life-destroying as this. People all too often leap to conclusions and then post them on the internet.
Nobody, myself included, is completely immune to this but this case was a stark incident of the practice.
So, you made it up.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Rowls wrote:This thread is about the public call for Tom Watson to apologize for his involvement in dragging innocent parties into false allegations of paedophilia.
These accusations have had terrible effects on the lives of those who were falsely accused.
Please explain the way Tom Watson dragged innocent parties into these false allegations.
(spoiler: he won't explain)
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Oops not liking it at all.fatboy47 wrote:Nothing much to see here...just Rowls' usual , Labour bad , Tory good chanting.
You ought to get real . This displayed gross misjudgment from this idiot Watson who went at it with such gusto. He is a prize pr!ck. He thought they were all Tories. Well its backfired and he had a shred of decency he would resign.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
So do you think serious sexual abuse allegations should be ignored by the police?Stayingup wrote:Oops not liking it at all.
You ought to get real . This displayed gross misjudgment from this idiot Watson who went at it with such gusto. He is a prize pr!ck. He thought they were all Tories. Well its backfired and he had a shred of decency he would resign.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I think it depends.martin_p wrote:So do you think serious sexual abuse allegations should be ignored by the police?
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theg ... llegations
Here’s the Zac Goldsmith story from a few years ago
Here’s the Zac Goldsmith story from a few years ago
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Hopefully the nonce who wasted the millions on the investigation ends up doing a good long stretch
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
On what?Imploding Turtle wrote:I think it depends.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Incorrect.Imploding Turtle wrote:
So, you made it up.
Perhaps some of the posters who were wrong about this first time round might post and admit it but I shan't think anything if they don't. They don't have any obligation to do so.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
It's already explained in the BBC article for those who want to find out.Imploding Turtle wrote:Please explain the way Tom Watson dragged innocent parties into these false allegations.
(spoiler: he won't explain)
edit - Here it is again https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49048972" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by Rowls on Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Imploding Turtle wrote:Please explain the way Tom Watson dragged innocent parties into these false allegations.
(spoiler: he won't explain)
Watson told MP's he new of clear intelligence - clear note - of a paedophile network linked to parliament and No 10. Wow. He pursued it with the police, But, but to be fair the police did not carry out basic checks that would have proved this Beech was lying. But the point is Watson thought he saw politcal gain and he was wrong. He should do the decent thing now and resign. JC would welcome that I am sure.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
No don't be silly. But as we know this was not true. Watson sought to gain a politcal coup against the tories but as explained further down the police were remiss in not making basic checks. Of course the police just love these types of enquiries dont they? Cliff Richard aomes to mind. So pleased he sued and won against the BBC.martin_p wrote:So do you think serious sexual abuse allegations should be ignored by the police?
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I’d like those who have a problem with what Watson did to explain what they’d have done in similar circumstances. Ignore allegations of serious sexual abuse and murder? Should he have dropped his whole campaign, meaning of course the three men found guilty of sexual abuse would have walked free?
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Ignoring the numerous failing of the Met police in their shambolic "investigation" I think that people who have no charges brought against them should not have their names dragged through the mud by serving MPs.martin_p wrote:So do you think serious sexual abuse allegations should be ignored by the police?
This is what Tom Watson did, having pressured the Met into carrying out their investigation, and having spoken publicly about it.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Did you know it wasn’t true when you he allegations were first made? The police investigation was undoubtedly poor, but a police investigation was needed.Stayingup wrote:No don't be silly. But as we know this was not true.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
What did he actually do? Did he expose Beech's victims? Did he push for an investigation, and if he did then what's wrong with that?Stayingup wrote:Watson told MP's he new of clear intelligence - clear note - of a paedophile network linked to parliament and No 10. Wow. He pursued it with the police, But, but to be fair the police did not carry out basic checks that would have proved this Beech was lying. But the point is Watson thought he saw politcal gain and he was wrong. He should do the decent thing now and resign. JC would welcome that I am sure.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Whose names did he drag through the mud? And when?Rowls wrote:Ignoring the numerous failing of the Met police in their shambolic "investigation" I think that people who have no charges brought against them should not have their names dragged through the mud by serving MPs.
This is what Tom Watson did, having pressured the Met into carrying out their investigation, and having spoken publicly about it.
These are basic questions I expect you to be able to answer if you're demanding that someone apologise for doing this.
Last edited by Imploding Turtle on Tue Jul 23, 2019 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
As I’ve already pointed out it was Harvey Proctor who revealed he was being investigated, Tom Watson named no one (although you’re still alleging he did using parliamentary privilege to do so).Rowls wrote:Ignoring the numerous failing of the Met police in their shambolic "investigation" I think that people who have no charges brought against them should not have their names dragged through the mud by serving MPs.
This is what Tom Watson did, having pressured the Met into carrying out their investigation, and having spoken publicly about it.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
martin_p wrote:As I’ve already pointed out it was Harvey Proctor who revealed he was being investigated, Tom Watson named no one (although you’re still alleging he did using parliamentary privilege to do so).
Maybe Rowls should apologise for lying about Tom Watson.
-
- Posts: 4476
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1160 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I quite like Tom Watson but didn’t know he’d named people in parliament with what was a case so trumped up it truly did beggar belief . The old bill and their near hysterical witch hunt in the wake of Savile was so staggeringly incompetent in treating “ every claim “ as beyond doubt. I think TW was setting himself up as a “ witch finder general “ type ,possibly in good faith .
Ironically the only people they nailed were a mate of Saviles, multi convicted n0nce Chris Denning and they only just got Glitter ffs !after a quite bizzare 2 yr “ did glitter touch you” type campaign and even then they struggled ,but talk about fish in a barrel .They did get the rancid horrible Max Clifford though ,but even then they turned a “dodgy casting couch” type trial into a “yewtree” trial by shoe horning a possibly underage charge in.
The vast bulk of yewtree was a fetid corrupt ego trip from the cps down
Ironically the only people they nailed were a mate of Saviles, multi convicted n0nce Chris Denning and they only just got Glitter ffs !after a quite bizzare 2 yr “ did glitter touch you” type campaign and even then they struggled ,but talk about fish in a barrel .They did get the rancid horrible Max Clifford though ,but even then they turned a “dodgy casting couch” type trial into a “yewtree” trial by shoe horning a possibly underage charge in.
The vast bulk of yewtree was a fetid corrupt ego trip from the cps down
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I don’t think he did name people in Parliament (unless someone can provide me some evidence I’m mistaken)AlargeClaret wrote:I quite like Tom Watson but didn’t know he’d named people in parliament with what was a case so trumped up it truly did beggar belief . The old bill and their near hysterical witch hunt in the wake of Savile was so staggeringly incompetent in treating “ every claim “ as beyond doubt. I think TW was setting himself up as a “ witch finder general “ type ,possibly in good faith .
Ironically the only people they nailed were a mate of Saviles, multi convicted n0nce Chris Denning and they only just got Glitter ffs !after a quite bizzare 2 yr “ did glitter touch you” type campaign and even then they struggled ,but talk about fish in a barrel .They did get the rancid horrible Max Clifford though ,but even then they turned a “dodgy casting couch” type trial into a “yewtree” trial by shoe horning a possibly underage charge in.
The vast bulk of yewtree was a fetid corrupt ego trip from the cps down
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
The Wiltshire Police's investigation was cursory because they performed theirs properly and dismissed these fantastical claims almost instantly.martin_p wrote:Did you know it wasn’t true when you he allegations were first made? The police investigation was undoubtedly poor, but a police investigation was needed.
The most basic of proper investigations would have dismissed this in an afternoon or two at most.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
I don’t disagree, but that’s the police’s job not Tom Watson’s.Rowls wrote:The Wiltshire Police's investigation was cursory because they performed theirs properly and dismissed these fantastical claims almost instantly.
The most basic of proper investigations would have dismissed this in an afternoon or two at most.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
That's my point - he should not have been exerting political pressure on a non-political organisation and trying to make political gain out of it.martin_p wrote:I don’t disagree, but that’s the police’s job not Tom Watson’s.
This is one of the things he should be apologizing for.
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
What political gain has he made out of it? And that’s not what you wanted him to apologise for in your original post.Rowls wrote:That's my point - he should not have been exerting political pressure on a non-political organisation and trying to make political gain out of it.
This is one of the things he should be apologizing for.
Have you found any basis for your claim that he used parliamentary privilege to name people yet or are you going to admit you’re wrong?
Last edited by martin_p on Tue Jul 23, 2019 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
No, I was wrong to say that he named people in Parliament.martin_p wrote:I don’t think he did name people in Parliament (unless someone can provide me some evidence I’m mistaken)
He did, however, name Leon Brittan whilst his corpse was still warm and his widow grieving. He went further than naming Leon Brittan; he public said that he fully believed the false allegations against him.
It also brought these wider allegations into the public domain and started a whispering process in the press and media.*
* edit - which resulted in Harvey Proctor feeling the need to make the accusations against him public.
Last edited by Rowls on Tue Jul 23, 2019 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2625 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
Just to prove a point about being non-partisan, playing the ball etc.. I think Rowls has a point on this one.
There were plenty - and no Charlie, I'm not going to waste the hottest day of the year trawling the archives for names - who were revelling in the idea of some top level Tory paedo ring. Pitchfork carrying morons on football message boards can be forgiven that, but Tom Watson should know better.
Especially as it turns out the brave whistleblower was a lying nonce who touches kids.
There were plenty - and no Charlie, I'm not going to waste the hottest day of the year trawling the archives for names - who were revelling in the idea of some top level Tory paedo ring. Pitchfork carrying morons on football message boards can be forgiven that, but Tom Watson should know better.
Especially as it turns out the brave whistleblower was a lying nonce who touches kids.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
It brought him personal political gain because it brought him into public prominence. He was not a well known figure before this.martin_p wrote:What political gain has he made out of it?
Have you found any basis for your claim that he used parliamentary privilege to name people yet or are you going to admit you’re wrong?
He was later elected Deputy Leader of the Labour Party on the back of his new found prominence.
See above for my retraction on him using Parliamentary privilege.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
We know. You don't get points for admitting you are wrong though. That's a basic requirement.Rowls wrote:No, I was wrong to say that he named people in Parliament.
Ah yes, there we are. From one lie to another.He did, however, name Leon Brittan whilst his corpse was still warm and his widow grieving. He went further than naming Leon Brittan; he public said that he fully believed the false allegations against him.
It also brought these wider allegations into the public domain and started a whispering process in the press and media.
As has been pointed out repeatedly already, Tom Watson wasn't who named Brittan.
So, by your own admission, the basis on which you demand Watson apologise and resign (or maybe it was someone else who wants him to resign) is false. But I bet you still want him to apologise for it though, don't you?
Re: Time For Tom Watson To Apologize
[*]
No, he said of the allegations ‘ It’s not for me to judge whether the claims made against Brittan are true. It’s for the police to investigate these claims as they continue to do so.‘Rowls wrote:No, I was wrong to say that he named people in Parliament.
He did, however, name Leon Brittan whilst his corpse was still warm and his widow grieving. He went further than naming Leon Brittan; he public said that he fully believed the false allegations against him.
It also brought these wider allegations into the public domain and started a whispering process in the press and media.*
* edit - which resulted in Harvey Proctor feeling the need to make the accusations against him public.