So you are saying I get 7.6 x 2.5 ?Greenmile wrote:Your question doesn’t make sense. The odds aren’t affected by the stake (unless the stake is big enough to affect the betting market).
Mueller Testimony: Live
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
For a 2.50 bet at decimal odds of 7.6, yes that would be your total winnings, including stake. Your profit would only be 6.6 x 2.50 though, the same as if you placed the bet at 6.6/1 (which you did).FCBurnley wrote:So you are saying I get 7.6 x 2.5 ?
Last edited by Greenmile on Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
7.6 stillFCBurnley wrote:So if my stake is 2.50 what are the decimal odds ?
The odds don't change depending on your stake.
at 33/5 if you placed a £2.5 bet your return would be £19 (£16.50 winnings, and your £2.50 stake)
19 divided by 2.5 equals 7.6, so 7.6 would be the digital odds and 33/5 the fractional odds.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
This is exactly right. It's why i find decimal odds easier to use. But if you're more used to fractional odds then that's what you'll find more easy to understand. But really, decimal is simply. Whatever the decimal odds, that's how many times your stake you get back.FCBurnley wrote:So you are saying I get 7.6 x 2.5 ?
I won't judge you for having trouble with the conversion. I've tried several times to understand American odds and i still haven't got a clue what you ***** are doing.
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Ok Got it. So there is no such decimal bet as 7.6/1. Only 7.6 which looks better odds than 6.6/1. Read the small print if placing a bet is the moral to this story. Still think Trump is a great bet at about evens...................I guess thats 2 in decimal betting !!!!
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
As you know I live in America and dont understand American odds either. Designed to confuse a bit like decimal odds I think.Imploding Turtle wrote:This is exactly right. It's why i find decimal odds easier to use. But if you're more used to fractional odds then that's what you'll find more easy to understand. But really, decimal is simply. Whatever the decimal odds, that's how many times your stake you get back.
I won't judge you for having trouble with the conversion. I've tried several times to understand American odds and i still haven't got a clue what you ***** are doing.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
7.6/1 would be 38/5FCBurnley wrote:Ok Got it. So there is no such decimal bet as 7.6/1. Only 7.6 which looks better odds than 6.6/1. Read the small print if placing a bet is the moral to this story. Still think Trump is a great bet at about evens...................I guess thats 2 in decimal betting !!!!
If ever you see someone mashing fractions and decimals together like that it's just a decimal odds person trying to make it easier to understand what the fractional odds are.
functionally 33/5 and 6.6/1 are the same. If you add 1 to the stake side, you add 6.6 to the profit side.
All decimal odds is doing is taking 6.6 and adding the stake to it to make 7.6
This is why the lowest possible decimal odds is 1.0 (implied probability being 100% at this price)
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
You've got it. Evens = 2.0.FCBurnley wrote:Ok Got it. So there is no such decimal bet as 7.6/1. Only 7.6 which looks better odds than 6.6/1. Read the small print if placing a bet is the moral to this story. Still think Trump is a great bet at about evens...................I guess thats 2 in decimal betting !!!!
I'd never heard of American betting before I read IT's post, but I've just had a Google and it seems really weird, though I can sort of see the logic. Is that how odds are generally given in the US, or is betting still illegal in most places? Wikipedia seems to suggest online gambling is banned in most states, but I'd imagine that's pretty much unenforceable.
How easy would it be for you to put a bet on the next Burnley game, for example?
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Cant bet online officially and cannot bet on any UK sites. But my son bets online with Bovada which I think is Canadian. You can bet on pretty much anything in the casinos which are mainly in Nevada or owned by Indian Tribes in say Florida for example. One thing that is interesting here is that say in the Womens World Cup the odds on USA would be way lower than in UK. So there are occasions to get better value. As for betting on PL its either online thru the likes of Bovada or in one of the Casino sports books. Hope that helps. Finally I dont understand how you can have decimal odds price of 1 ? surely that means you just get your stake back ? 1.1 would be 1/10 in fractions I think
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Right again. You can't have decimal odds of 1.FCBurnley wrote:Cant bet online officially and cannot bet on any UK sites. But my son bets online with Bovada which I think is Canadian. You can bet on pretty much anything in the casinos which are mainly in Nevada or owned by Indian Tribes in say Florida for example. One thing that is interesting here is that say in the Womens World Cup the odds on USA would be way lower than in UK. So there are occasions to get better value. As for betting on PL its either online thru the likes of Bovada or in one of the Casino sports books. Hope that helps. Finally I dont understand how you can have decimal odds price of 1 ? surely that means you just get your stake back ? 1.1 would be 1/10 in fractions I think
Odd-on bets (shorter than evens) are where where fractional odds make more sense - they can get confusing in decimal.
2/7 (bet £7 for £2 profit, or £9 return) seems far more intuitive to me than 1.286, for example.
Also - thanks for the info.
-
- Posts: 3889
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1216 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
The evolution of Turtles.
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Surely it should be extinction not evolutionClaretMoffitt wrote:The evolution of Turtles.
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
You are welcome. Decimal works for most bets but certainly not all. Cant imagine the carnage if on track bookies used it.Greenmile wrote:Right again. You can't have decimal odds of 1.
Odd-on bets (shorter than evens) are where where fractional odds make more sense - they can get confusing in decimal.
2/7 (bet £7 for £2 profit, or £9 return) seems far more intuitive to me than 1.286, for example.
Also - thanks for the info.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
I can't think of a scenario where it wouldn't work.FCBurnley wrote:You are welcome. Decimal works for most bets but certainly not all. Cant imagine the carnage if on track bookies used it.
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Keep the discussion lite...
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Mueller Testimony: Live
Republicans have blocked another election security bill because they don't want the democrats to have a "political benefit" from Russia not hacking the election
These are the real people who hate America and hate democracy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/25/poli ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These are the real people who hate America and hate democracy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/25/poli ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;