What a crock of . . . . . .
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I’m sorry, IT. I’m usually on your side with LGBT+ issues. However, Pansexuality is just Bisexuality in a fancy dress. It’s an affectation that does the LGBT+ cause no good at all; in my humble opinion.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Bfcboyo wrote:More likely linked to all the confusion in their minds . Clearly they have to live in troubled minds with restless souls having to cope with the burden of pushing against millions of years of evolution and nature must come at a hefty price. It is a shame more is not done to study and aid them rather than just throw another label at them.
I'm quite certain society's smallest minds expressing and spreading hatred of them plays a part.
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Maybe people would like to comment on a thread without you hijacking it all the time.Imploding Turtle wrote:Or what? lol. Who the **** made you the internet police?
This user liked this post: Funkydrummer
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I don't believe that's true. Bisexuality generally, at least by my understanding, doesn't include an attraction to transgender people. It's an attraction to people who are cisgender but of either of the binary genders. Being pansexual means it doesn't matter where on the spectrum of gender someone is.Lord Beamish wrote:I’m sorry, IT. I’m usually on your side with LGBT+ issues. However, Pansexuality is just Bisexuality in a fancy dress. It’s an affectation that does the LGBT+ cause no good at all; in my humble opinion.
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Someone suggested a separate political board. Perhaps there should be an age board for youths.Imploding Turtle wrote:Or what? lol. Who the **** made you the internet police?
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
If we are to consider Trans Men and Trans Women as the Gender they self identify, then it all amounts to the same thing anyway. It strikes me as a distinction without a difference. Pansexuality is just sexed-up Bisexuality. It’s a nonsense, seemingly created for people who just can’t stand to be common-or-garden variety.Imploding Turtle wrote:I don't believe that's true. Bisexuality generally, at least by my understanding, doesn't include an attraction to transgender people. It's an attraction to people who are cisgender but of either of the binary genders. Being pansexual means it doesn't matter where on the spectrum of gender someone is.
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
So you're of the belief that usually bisexuals aren't interested in transsexual or transgender?Imploding Turtle wrote:I don't believe that's true. Bisexuality generally, at least by my understanding, doesn't include an attraction to transgender people. It's an attraction to people who are cisgender but of either of the binary genders. Being pansexual means it doesn't matter where on the spectrum of gender someone is.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
My understanding of the difference between bisexuality and pansexuality is that bisexuals are people who are generally sexually attracted to people at either end of the gender spectrum, whereas pansexuals are attracted to people regardless of where they are on the gender spectrum.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:So you're of the belief that usually bisexuals aren't interested in transsexual or transgender?
-
- Posts: 8987
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2009 times
- Has Liked: 2904 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
We used to have an equal rights for the fat and ugly in the 90’s this isn’t a new thing.
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I was just having a read up and there was an interesting comment - "bisexuality, it's been claimed, is a gender binary, and therefore oppressive, word.Imploding Turtle wrote:My understanding of the difference between bisexuality and pansexuality is that bisexuals are people who are generally sexually attracted to people at either end of the gender spectrum, whereas pansexuals are attracted to people regardless of where they are on the gender spectrum.
Personally I can't see much difference between the two, Bi and Pan.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I feel like I've explained it best i can. If you're just going to dismiss it as nonsense then fine, but it's obviously not as simple as you're trying to make out that it is.Lord Beamish wrote:If we are to consider Trans Men and Trans Women as the Gender they self identify, then it all amounts to the same thing anyway. It strikes me as a distinction without a difference. Pansexuality is just sexed-up Bisexuality. It’s a nonsense, seemingly created for people who just can’t stand to be common-or-garden variety.
Yes, treat transgender people as the gender they identify as. Or perhaps just not consider their gender at all. But that doesn't mean you have to be sexually attracted to trans women if you're also attracted to non-trans women. And that's how you can relate to the difference between bi and pan. (I'm assuming you're straight, based on probabilities). If you're heterosexual and attracted to women, that doesn't necessarily mean you're attracted to trans-women. Just like if you're bisexual and attracted to men and women, it doesn't necessarily mean you're attracted to trans men and trans women.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I’m sorry IT. I’ve never had an argument that convinced me that Bi and Pan aren’t as good as the same; and yours hasn’t either. They seem a distinction without a difference.Imploding Turtle wrote:I feel like I've explained it best i can. If you're just going to dismiss it as nonsense then fine, but it's obviously not as simple as you're trying to make out that it is.
Yes, treat transgender people as the gender they identify as. Or perhaps just not consider their gender at all. But that doesn't mean you have to be sexually attracted to trans women if you're also attracted to non-trans women.
I guess we’ll just have to agree to differ.
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Interestingly I'm aware of a lot of blokes who are adamant they're straight but will have sex with a TS person.Imploding Turtle wrote:I feel like I've explained it best i can. If you're just going to dismiss it as nonsense then fine, but it's obviously not as simple as you're trying to make out that it is.
Yes, treat transgender people as the gender they identify as. Or perhaps just not consider their gender at all. But that doesn't mean you have to be sexually attracted to trans women if you're also attracted to non-trans women. And that's how you can relate to the difference between bi and pan. (I'm assuming you're straight, based on probabilities). If you're heterosexual and attracted to women, that doesn't necessarily mean you're attracted to trans-women. Just like if you're bisexual and attracted to men and women, it doesn't necessarily mean you're attracted to trans men and trans women.
It's almost like they won't admit the truth.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
There's nothing to admit.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Interestingly I'm aware of a lot of blokes who are adamant they're straight but will have sex with a TS person.
It's almost like they won't admit the truth.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Here's a spectrum of genders, 1 to 9.Lord Beamish wrote:I’m sorry IT. I’ve never had an argument that convinced me that Bi and Pan aren’t as good as the same; and yours hasn’t either. They seem a distinction without a difference.
I guess we’ll just have to agree to differ.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Bisexual people are sexually attracted to numbers 1 and 9
Pansexual are sexually attracted to all of them.
This is the easiest way i can explain it to you without literally drawing you pictures.
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
They aren't straight, because the people they're having sex with are pre-ops.Imploding Turtle wrote:There's nothing to admit.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
You guessed right. I am Heterosexual. I would not rule out having a relationship with a Trans Woman just on the basis that they were born male. I’d have to fancy them, too.Imploding Turtle wrote:
Yes, treat transgender people as the gender they identify as. Or perhaps just not consider their gender at all. But that doesn't mean you have to be sexually attracted to trans women if you're also attracted to non-trans women. And that's how you can relate to the difference between bi and pan. (I'm assuming you're straight, based on probabilities). If you're heterosexual and attracted to women, that doesn't necessarily mean you're attracted to trans-women. Just like if you're bisexual and attracted to men and women, it doesn't necessarily mean you're attracted to trans men and trans women.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Doesn't matter. It's just sex. For example, a woman having sex with another woman doesn't mean she's capable of having romantic feelings for one.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:They aren't straight, because the people they're having sex with are pre-ops.
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
If someone is pansexual they will always be single because as soon as someone says “I’m pansexual” you automatically think they have a sh*te personality
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Hmm, I'm not sure you're right about that.Imploding Turtle wrote:Doesn't matter. It's just sex. For example, a woman having sex with another woman doesn't mean she's capable of having romantic feelings for one.
If a someone who defines themselves as straight has sex with someone of the same gender or a transgender person then they aren't straight.
They're just afraid to admit it to themselves.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
That's because you're thinking that sexuality is defined by who you have sex with, and not by who you romantically love.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Hmm, I'm not sure you're right about that.
If a someone who defines themselves as straight has sex with someone of the same gender or a transgender person then they aren't straight.
They're just afraid to admit it to themselves.
The romantic component matters.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I guess we’ll have to agree to differ, as I don’t really accept your original premise(the 1-9 bit), and I’m damned if I’m getting into a big debate with you about it.Imploding Turtle wrote:Here's a spectrum of genders, 1 to 9.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Bisexual people are sexually attracted to numbers 1 and 9
Pansexual are sexually attracted to all of them.
This is the easiest way i can explain it to you without literally drawing you pictures.
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
How do you know they have sex with transgender people if they dont admit it?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Interestingly I'm aware of a lot of blokes who are adamant they're straight but will have sex with a TS person.
It's almost like they won't admit the truth.
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 232 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Hmm, I'm not sure you're right about that.
If a someone who defines themselves as straight has sex with someone of the same gender or a transgender person then they aren't straight.
They're just afraid to admit it to themselves.
I don't think that's true at all. I've never had sex with a guy, and I don't plan on doing as they aren't my bag, but I've had a girlfriend who experimented in her youth, and known/still know people who were scissor sisters or backstreet boys in their youth who are 100% straight now.
Sticking your dick in something doesn't define anything beyond the fact you've stuck your dick in it.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Well, ok. If you ever want to find more information just google "what's the difference between pansexual and bisexual". Lots of good information awaits.Lord Beamish wrote:I guess we’ll have to agree to differ, as I don’t really accept your original premise(the 1-9 bit), and I’m damned if I’m getting into a big debate with you about it.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I suspect my life will be just as complete if I don’t do that; but thanks for the sage advice.Imploding Turtle wrote:Well, ok. If you ever want to find more information just google "what's the difference between pansexual and bisexual". Lots of good information awaits.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
No need to be a ****.Lord Beamish wrote:I suspect my life will be just as complete if I don’t do that; but thanks for the sage advice.
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 232 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
If you want advice on sage I recommend these guys.Lord Beamish wrote:I suspect my life will be just as complete if I don’t do that; but thanks for the sage advice.
https://www.sjsoftware.co.uk/about-us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
You have to be on the right adult sites to see what they're looking for.Damo wrote:How do you know they have sex with transgender people if they dont admit it?
I see TS people looking for straight people to have sex with too.
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
They aren't really 100% straight though, they've just found someone of the opposite gender to settle down with.duncandisorderly wrote:I don't think that's true at all. I've never had sex with a guy, and I don't plan on doing as they aren't my bag, but I've had a girlfriend who experimented in her youth, and known/still know people who were scissor sisters or backstreet boys in their youth who are 100% straight now.
Sticking your dick in something doesn't define anything beyond the fact you've stuck your dick in it.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
“This is the easiest way i can explain it to you without literally drawing you pictures.”Imploding Turtle wrote:No need to be a ****.
Touché
-
- Posts: 10969
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5185 times
- Has Liked: 803 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Aren't bisexuals just really perverse disease spreaders who will shag owt?
This user liked this post: Bertiebeehead
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 232 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:They aren't really 100% straight though, they've just found someone of the opposite gender to settle down with.
Really though? What about gay people who tried really hard not to be gay, back when it was a bigger deal than it is now, so got a girlfriend, or even married and had kids?
I know two (broad spectrum I know!) lads I went to school with who both had girlfriends at 15 and have since come out as gay. Are they not 100% gay?
They'd well argue they were.
-
- Posts: 3591
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2596 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I can see where you’re coming from here. Humans having been rubbing their bits together forever, with all sorts of people depending on mood, opportunity and often quality of lighting.duncandisorderly wrote:Sticking your dick in something doesn't define anything beyond the fact you've stuck your dick in it.
I’m very much in the live and let live camp, we’re all horny apes essentially. But I do find it sometimes tiresome, but often amusing, when we try and split this down into endlessly divisible categories as we search for an oh so fascinating niche.
There are males and females. How they feel, what they do and where they put their bits is entirely their business. That’s about it, throw as many names at it as you like.
-
- Posts: 14567
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Pressures of society forced them to try and conform to what they thought they had to be.duncandisorderly wrote:Really though? What about gay people who tried really hard not to be gay, back when it was a bigger deal than it is now, so got a girlfriend, or even married and had kids?
I know two (broad spectrum I know!) lads I went to school with who both had girlfriends at 15 and have since come out as gay. Are they not 100% gay?
They'd well argue they were.
There's a difference.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
That was intended to just be a bit of friendly fun. If you took offence then that's your fault for not reading my mind.Lord Beamish wrote:“This is the easiest way i can explain it to you without literally drawing you pictures.”
Touché
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
I just returned your friendly fun in kind.Imploding Turtle wrote:That was intended to just be a bit of friendly fun. If you took offence then that's your fault for not reading my mind.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
Sure. We'll go with that.Lord Beamish wrote:I just returned your friendly fun in kind.
Re: What a crock of . . . . . .
There's plenty of pictures already on the internet!Imploding Turtle wrote:Here's a spectrum of genders, 1 to 9.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Bisexual people are sexually attracted to numbers 1 and 9
Pansexual are sexually attracted to all of them.
This is the easiest way i can explain it to you without literally drawing you pictures.