What a crock of . . . . . .

Funkydrummer · Post by **Funkydrummer** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:24 pm

....... biz.

Anything to attract attention.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... ailsignout" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:27 pm

Why do you care about the sexuality of someone who nobody has ever heard of?

Funkydrummer · Post by **Funkydrummer** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:30 pm

What makes you think that I care ?

That's a mighty big assumption you're making. Just bringing it to the arena for discussion.

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:31 pm

Funkydrummer wrote:What makes you think that I care ?

That's a mighty big assumption you're making. Just bringing it to the arena for discussion.

Seems like a lot of effort to make if you don’t care.

Funkydrummer · Post by **Funkydrummer** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:35 pm

You've made as much effort as I have, so there !

By the way, is there only me and thee making an effort ?

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:40 pm

Funkydrummer wrote:You've made as much effort as I have, so there !

I see so many pointless news articles when browsing the web. If Kim Kardashian announced that her cat had a nut allergy (no pun intended), I wouldn’t take the time to post it on here. Who even is Bella Thorne?

elwaclaret · Post by **elwaclaret** » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:52 pm

Rileybobs wrote:I see so many pointless news articles when browsing the web. If Kim Kardashian announced that her cat had a nut allergy (no pun intended), I wouldn’t take the time to post it on here. Who even is Bella Thorne?

Not read as realised celebrity gossip.

Seems, a little crush perhaps? As gossip on forums is the life blood of these quasi celeb types, one can only suggest one protests too much?

Damo · Post by **Damo** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:03 am

I dont know what pansexual means, but if the picture is anything to go by, then I wouldn't mind finding out

Darnhill Claret · Post by **Darnhill Claret** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:15 am

Well done Bella.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:24 am

Damo wrote:I dont know what pansexual means, but if the picture is anything to go by, then I wouldn't mind finding out

It means she likes people based on their personality, not their sexual organs, so unless you've been hiding one from us for all these years you don't have a chance.

evensteadiereddie · Post by **evensteadiereddie** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:24 am

Fair play ; she's got the best of both worlds.

GodIsADeeJay81 · Post by **GodIsADeeJay81** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:31 am

Funkydrummer wrote:What makes you think that I care ?

That's a mighty big assumption you're making. Just bringing it to the arena for discussion.

Fairly pointless bringing it to this arena for discussion when there are people on here who still struggle to accept homosexuality.
Pansexuality is a whole new level of different for them to wrap their heads around

NottsClaret · Post by **NottsClaret** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 7:34 am

To the casual observer it doesn’t sound massively different to bisexual, which always sounded the best result for anyone.

But in 2019, that doesn’t really give you the ‘standout’ a celebrity needs in their bid for tortured uniqueness, so expect a lot of courageous battles with pansexuality in a glossy magazine or talk show over the next 12 months.

Murger · Post by **Murger** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 7:36 am

NottsClaret wrote:To the casual observer it doesn’t sound massively different to bisexual, which always sounded the best result for anyone.

But in 2019, that doesn’t really give you the ‘standout’ a celebrity needs in their bid for tortured uniqueness, so expect a lot of courageous battles with pansexuality in a glossy magazine or talk show over the next 12 months.

Was just about to post something similar. Sounds like it's another made up title. If you like someone regardless of gender, doesn't that make you a bi?

Lord Beamish · Post by **Lord Beamish** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:18 am

As far as I can see it’s just splitting hairs with the concept of Bisexuality, but whatever gets you through the night, and all that...

houseboy · Post by **houseboy** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:16 am

Okay I can now confess to being more than a little worried. I really love my dog's personality AND he's male.

Should I see a doctor?

TheFamilyCat · Post by **TheFamilyCat** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:19 am

NottsClaret wrote:To the casual observer it doesn’t sound massively different to bisexual, which always sounded the best result for anyone.

But in 2019, that doesn’t really give you the ‘standout’ a celebrity needs in their bid for tortured uniqueness, so expect a lot of courageous battles with pansexuality in a glossy magazine or talk show over the next 12 months.

I’ll believe it when these good looking pansexual celebrities start dating full-on ugly bastards.

Buxtonclaret · Post by **Buxtonclaret** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:26 am

Who says you can't have your cake and tweet it.

Bosscat · Post by **Bosscat** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:10 am

TheFamilyCat wrote:I’ll believe it when these good looking pansexual celebrities start dating full-on ugly bastards.

Is a 'Pansexual' someone who loves cooking?

AlargeClaret · Post by **AlargeClaret** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:21 am

Generally speaking “celebrity sexuality” and it’s “ outing” is pretty much always linked to a new album/tour/film/book or a red top about to expose them

No idea wtf a “pan” sexual is ? But I see the woman ( can we still say that?) has a new book out ..quelle surprise !

Blackrod · Post by **Blackrod** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:58 pm

Pan sexual is so 2018. Why restrict yourself to just personalities. What about objects and plant life.

Billy Balfour · Post by **Billy Balfour** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:12 pm

This forum would sure get spammed up if everyone started a new thread every time they read some MSN clickbait.

houseboy · Post by **houseboy** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:27 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:I’ll believe it when these good looking pansexual celebrities start dating full-on ugly bastards.

I think this post just about encapsulates the whole discussion. Whoever this Bella is she is a good looking girl - if she turns up at some awards do with the equivalent of Quasimodo on her arm then I'll believe her.

houseboy · Post by **houseboy** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:30 pm

Blackrod wrote:Pan sexual is so 2018. Why restrict yourself to just personalities. What about objects and plant life.

All of a sudden Queen's 'I'm in Love with My Car' takes on a whole new meaning.

houseboy · Post by **houseboy** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:30 pm

Bosscat wrote:Is a 'Pansexual' someone who loves cooking?

Only if you're using a turkey baster.

Bin Ont Turf · Post by **Bin Ont Turf** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:35 pm

Damo wrote:I dont know what pansexual means, but if the picture is anything to go by, then I wouldn't mind finding out

I don't really like my pansexual birds talking shite and having nose rings.

Falcon · Post by **Falcon** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:56 pm

I'm not really bothered either way re nose rings but if you're trying to find a 'bird' of any sexuality who doesn't talk shite you're in for a struggle...

dsr · Post by **dsr** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:04 pm

I never understood how having a fake bogey hanging from your nose became fashionable.

houseboy · Post by **houseboy** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:44 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:I don't really like my pansexual birds talking shite and having nose rings.

Would you use a turkey baster on a pansexual bird?

houseboy · Post by **houseboy** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:47 pm

dsr wrote:I never understood how having a fake bogey hanging from your nose became fashionable.

I saw a bloke at a festival this weekend with one of those wooden plate things in his earlobe (he was in his 40's so not a kid). Do these people realise that if they get fed up with it they will then have a lifelong 'handle' on the side of their head?

Bosscat · Post by **Bosscat** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 4:56 pm

houseboy wrote:I saw a bloke at a festival this weekend with one of those wooden plate things in his earlobe (he was in his 40's so not a kid). Do these people realise that if they get fed up with it they will then have a lifelong 'handle' on the side of their head?

Lifelong handle

Had to log in just to like that house

rob63 · Post by **rob63** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:03 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:I’ll believe it when these good looking pansexual celebrities start dating full-on ugly bastards.

Are you putting yourself forward?

rob63 · Post by **rob63** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:05 pm

Bosscat wrote:Is a 'Pansexual' someone who loves cooking?

I like cooking but I was hoping it was more like someone who enjoyed washing up cos I hate that!

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:46 pm

Part of the reason LGBTQ+ people have a higher incidence of suicides and suicide attempts is in large part because of the attitudes like that of the OP.

Murger · Post by **Murger** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:54 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Part of the reason LGBTQ+ people have a higher incidence of suicides and suicide attempts is in large part because of the attitudes like that of the OP.

Here to hijack yet another thread IT?

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:04 pm

Murger wrote:Here to hijack yet another thread IT?

Yep. I think a thread that's all about mocking people for their sexuality is worth hijacking.

But you know what, Murger? If you want to continue this thread's origins and mock LGBTQ+ people then by all means don't let me stop you.

NottsClaret · Post by **NottsClaret** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:08 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Yep. I think a thread that's all about mocking people for their sexuality is worth hijacking.

Let this one go Turtle, no one's getting mocked for their sexuality, just the daft rebranding.

Leisure · Post by **Leisure** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:09 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Yep. I think a thread that's all about mocking people for their sexuality is worth hijacking.

But you know what, Murger? If you want to continue this thread's origins and mock LGBTQ+ people then by all means don't let me stop you.

LGBTQ+ - just googled this for an explanation but there was no mention of pansexuality. How does this fit in?

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:11 pm

Leisure wrote:LGBTQ+ - just googled this for an explanation but there was no mention of pansexuality. How does this fit in?

+

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:13 pm

NottsClaret wrote:Let this one go Turtle, no one's getting mocked for their sexuality, just the daft rebranding.

I've made my point.

Murger · Post by **Murger** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:14 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I've made my point.

Well done, now move on.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:15 pm

Murger wrote:Well done, now move on.

Or what? lol. Who the **** made you the internet police?

Leisure · Post by **Leisure** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:17 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:+

Right, that's cleared that up!

So does + then cover anything else that hasn't been thought up yet?

And why not just have L+?

GodIsADeeJay81 · Post by **GodIsADeeJay81** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:22 pm

NottsClaret wrote:Let this one go Turtle, no one's getting mocked for their sexuality, just the daft rebranding.

What's been rebranded?

tim_noone · Post by **tim_noone** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:24 pm

houseboy wrote:Okay I can now confess to being more than a little worried. I really love my dog's personality AND he's male.

Should I see a doctor?

Personally I'd be seeing the Vet.....

Damo · Post by **Damo** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:25 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:It means she likes people based on their personality, not their sexual organs, so unless you've been hiding one from us for all these years you don't have a chance.

Touche, Turtle

: TOUCHE_TURTLE_1.jpg (21.72 KiB) Viewed 2676 times

Bfcboyo · Post by **Bfcboyo** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:27 pm

Funkydrummer wrote:....... biz.

Anything to attract attention.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... ailsignout" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I don't normally comment on this sort of nonesense but I do think people are throwing ridiculous theories around that are being accepted after 5 minutes by psychologist. What happened to years of studies to confirm facts not just label everything with a new name and make it the latest fashion. She is clearly just bi horny and likes attention in the press.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:29 pm

Damo wrote:Touche, Turtle
TOUCHE_TURTLE_1.jpg

Just a little bit of humour from me to you.

TheFamilyCat · Post by **TheFamilyCat** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:31 pm

rob63 wrote:Are you putting yourself forward?

No, i’m not risking being dumped for an even uglier bird.

Bfcboyo · Post by **Bfcboyo** » Mon Jul 29, 2019 6:35 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Part of the reason LGBTQ+ people have a higher incidence of suicides and suicide attempts is in large part because of the attitudes like that of the OP.

More likely linked to all the confusion in their minds . Clearly they have to live in troubled minds with restless souls having to cope with the burden of pushing against millions of years of evolution and nature must come at a hefty price. It is a shame more is not done to study and aid them rather than just throw another label at them.