Children with Cancer UK advertising
-
- Posts: 67892
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32542 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Children with Cancer UK advertising
I’m sure they weren’t there last Tuesday but yesterday all the ads on the front of the cricket field stand roof had been replaced with ones for the above charity. There were also ads for the charity at pitch level behind both goals.
-
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Children with Cancer UK advertising
Ladbrokes charity partner.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/sbcnews. ... rtner/amp/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/sbcnews. ... rtner/amp/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 67892
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32542 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Children with Cancer UK advertising
And there was me thinking the club had done it
These 2 users liked this post: damo_whitehead FactualFrank
Children with Cancer Stand
Have Ladbrokes sponsorship of the Cricketfield stand ended?
Children with Cancer logos instead!
Surely if we are giving free sponsorship there should be a lot of publicity
Children with Cancer logos instead!
Surely if we are giving free sponsorship there should be a lot of publicity
-
- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Children with Cancer Stand
Think it’s a Ladbrokes partner charity or something. Still good though.
-
- Posts: 9319
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4842 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Children with Cancer Stand
It’s a partner company. At least it’s not openly promoting gambling. Much rather have that.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Children with Cancer UK advertising
So the betting company would not be in anyway involved with saving kids, unless it benefited themselves. How transparent can you get?
This user liked this post: bob-the-scutter