Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
http://toxicpatat.com/liverpool-v-norwi ... -stream-2/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Strong sides for both,they clearly regard this as a valuable trophy.
-
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 2595 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Liverpool 1 goal keeper away from starting Andy Lonergen................
These 2 users liked this post: JohnMac Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2378 times
- Has Liked: 3801 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Still can't believe Robertson chose them over us
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
- Been Liked: 499 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
A massive weak link there for a club who will be chasing both the PL and CL titles this season. Hoping Alisson's injury keeps him out of the game at TM and that it's an area we are able to exploit.dandeclaret wrote:Liverpool 1 goal keeper away from starting Andy Lonergen................
-
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 608 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Good finish by Giroud. But Kante is the key man for Chelsea. He’ll be starting from now on
-
- Posts: 8467
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2461 times
- Has Liked: 1991 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Supposed to be out 6weeks.EarbyClaret wrote:A massive weak link there for a club who will be chasing both the PL and CL titles this season. Hoping Alisson's injury keeps him out of the game at TM and that it's an area we are able to exploit.
-
- Posts: 30626
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
scousers all over the place at the back
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Miles better side here chelsea
-
- Posts: 30626
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
and just like that 1-1
-
- Posts: 6698
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1816 times
- Has Liked: 1796 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
The offside for Chelsea. Why did she wait til he put it in the net to put the flag up?
What if he had played someone else in to score, he would have been just as much offside, would the flag have gone up then - or would the goal have stood?
Not even a VAR issue, just a question of the current offside interpretation.
What if he had played someone else in to score, he would have been just as much offside, would the flag have gone up then - or would the goal have stood?
Not even a VAR issue, just a question of the current offside interpretation.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Yawn fest....
-
- Posts: 6698
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1816 times
- Has Liked: 1796 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Been better than I anticipated tbh, but I accept it's a a pointless game.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
I'm not certain but i believe this is one of the new regulations,they let the game flow and then flag.dougcollins wrote:The offside for Chelsea. Why did she wait til he put it in the net to put the flag up?
What if he had played someone else in to score, he would have been just as much offside, would the flag have gone up then - or would the goal have stood?
Not even a VAR issue, just a question of the current offside interpretation.
It's bizarre to me as well,and it will cause a lot of friction during the course of the season.
-
- Posts: 6698
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1816 times
- Has Liked: 1796 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Not to mention unwarranted injuries.
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Seems odd then that the linesman flagged when the Southampton player slipped rather than allowing Barnes to cross the ball instead.tiger76 wrote:I'm not certain but i believe this is one of the new regulations,they let the game flow and then flag.
It's bizarre to me as well,and it will cause a lot of friction during the course of the season.
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
They've been given different instructions in the PL.Spijed wrote:Seems odd then that the linesman flagged when the Southampton player slipped rather than allowing Barnes to cross the ball instead.
This user liked this post: BertiesBeehole
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Well that makes a lot of sense,i thought the idea of these new rules was to ensure consistency across the board,is it any wonder the players are confused.
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:35 am
- Been Liked: 286 times
- Has Liked: 139 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
I think they will have to have a Goal of the Season for disallowed goals. There’s pretty much going to be between 1 and 3 few per match, on average!!tiger76 wrote:I'm not certain but i believe this is one of the new regulations,they let the game flow and then flag.
It's bizarre to me as well,and it will cause a lot of friction during the course of the season.
City in particular will score loads the way they play so close to the lines.
-
- Posts: 6698
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1816 times
- Has Liked: 1796 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
The first time there's a substantial injury-causing collision between an offside striker and a keeper it'll be reverted.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Never in this world ...
-
- Posts: 5642
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
- Been Liked: 766 times
- Has Liked: 499 times
- Location: Devon
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
If the West Ham match is an indicator you will be accurate in your prediction,if they're going to follow offsides to the letter of the law,then marginal calls will result in no goal,the problems will come if a situation arises similar to Sterling's later in the season,and the benefit of the doubt favours the attacker,ditto with 'accidental' handball as long as there's a level playing field,and they stick to the precedent that's been set with the Boly incident that's fine,but i remember the shirt tugging clampdown a couple of seasons ago,when penalties were given left right and centre for a few weeks,and then suddenly the refs weren't being as strict on this area of the game,so we'll see how it goes over the coming months.Cubanclaret wrote:I think they will have to have a Goal of the Season for disallowed goals. There’s pretty much going to be between 1 and 3 few per match, on average!!
City in particular will score loads the way they play so close to the lines.
-
- Posts: 30626
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
VAR should help us with how organised our back 4 are, we should catch loads offside
-
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
What on earth is VAR for if not for disallowing that penalty????
-
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3178 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Anyone thinking the L'pool players showed a little more respect to the ref on that penalty call?
I wonder if we should have female refs for every big game?
I wonder if we should have female refs for every big game?
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:19 am
- Been Liked: 409 times
- Has Liked: 3421 times
- Location: Crawley West Sussex
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
I think because:Spijed wrote:Seems odd then that the linesman flagged when the Southampton player slipped rather than allowing Barnes to cross the ball instead.
He became active when he touched the ball.
He didn't wait for VAR as it was so far away from goal and he (the lino)was very confident Barnes was offside.
They'll only delay on a tight offside call where there is likely to be a goalscoring opportunity.
It's messy though. What happens if they suspect offside and don't flag and the keeper tips it over the bar? That cannot go to VAR. But without VAR there would likely to have been an offside call.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
The argument seems to be it wasn't a clear and obvious error,so the ref's decision stands,it'll certainly encourage more players to go to ground when there's minimal contact,Dele Alli will be excited by that call among many others.Rowls wrote:What on earth is VAR for if not for disallowing that penalty????
-
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
It was clearly and obviously a dive.tiger76 wrote:The argument seems to be it wasn't a clear and obvious error,so the ref's decision stands,it'll certainly encourage more players to go to ground when there's minimal contact,Dele Alli will be excited by that call among many others.
-
- Posts: 8467
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2461 times
- Has Liked: 1991 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
If the Southampton guy had played the ball and then slipped it was onside. As he didn’t and Ash was first to play the ball it was, correctly, offside. It was obvious so no need for VAR.Spijed wrote:Seems odd then that the linesman flagged when the Southampton player slipped rather than allowing Barnes to cross the ball instead.
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Never a penalty.worst referee Dicision making since.that Harrow school teacher
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
That's what most people in the crowd thought,so how on earth can the VAR official not see that with the various different angles,this doesn't bode well for the CL and PL games to come,if such an obvious dive can't be caught out.Rowls wrote:It was clearly and obviously a dive.
-
- Posts: 30626
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
love seeing ****** off Chelsea fans
-
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1402 times
- Has Liked: 2692 times
- Location: varied
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Does the rule regarding goalkeepers staying on their line during a penalty shootout no longer count?
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Karma's a bitch,Abraham missing is so sweet.
-
- Posts: 30626
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
he was nearly on the half way lineSpijed wrote:Does the rule regarding goalkeepers staying on their line during a penalty shootout no longer count?
-
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5096 times
- Has Liked: 5159 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Think the commentary team got it right - UEFA didn't want to overrule their ref in a high profile game.tiger76 wrote:That's what most people in the crowd thought,so how on earth can the VAR official not see that with the various different angles,this doesn't bode well for the CL and PL games to come,if such an obvious dive can't be caught out.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
You could well be right,in that case what's the point in having VAR then.Rowls wrote:Think the commentary team got it right - UEFA didn't want to overrule their ref in a high profile game.
This user liked this post: Rowls
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Abraham is nowhere near the required level for Chelsea.
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 341 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
The point about the offside in the Southampton game is one that I’ve pondered myself.
Had the goal have stood, then would Southampton have been rightly aggrieved that the linesman flagged for offside, this causing them to (perhaps) stop playing?
I’m not sure what the protocol is in the Premier League so apologies but I thought it was meant to be more along the lines of how tonight’s game was officiated?
Had the goal have stood, then would Southampton have been rightly aggrieved that the linesman flagged for offside, this causing them to (perhaps) stop playing?
I’m not sure what the protocol is in the Premier League so apologies but I thought it was meant to be more along the lines of how tonight’s game was officiated?
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Hes not even championship standardBurnleyFC wrote:Abraham is nowhere near the required level for Chelsea.
There cryin out 4 a striker
-
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2378 times
- Has Liked: 3801 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
48 goals in 78 games in the Championship probably says you are wrong.theroyaldyche wrote:Hes not even championship standard
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Hes shiteJohnMac wrote:48 goals in 78 games in the Championship probably says you are wrong.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
That non championship "striker" has cost you money......he has hasn't he?theroyaldyche wrote:Miles better side here chelsea
This user liked this post: JohnMac
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
They might have been aggrieved, but not rightly. Because for one thing, the Premier League rule is that the lineman fflags but the ref doesn't whistle. And for another thing, if they haven't learned by now that "Play to the Whistle" is the rule, then they wouldn't be bright enough to understand offside anyway.Cheshireclaret wrote:The point about the offside in the Southampton game is one that I’ve pondered myself.
Had the goal have stood, then would Southampton have been rightly aggrieved that the linesman flagged for offside, this causing them to (perhaps) stop playing?
I’m not sure what the protocol is in the Premier League so apologies but I thought it was meant to be more along the lines of how tonight’s game was officiated?
Golden rule - the linesman cannot give offside. Only the referee can give offside or any other free kick.
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 341 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
I get that and I’m the first to moan when our players switch off and don’t ‘play to the whistle’ but if as the referee one of your assistants has stopped running and put his or her flag in the air, aren’t you compelled to then do something?dsr wrote:They might have been aggrieved, but not rightly. Because for one thing, the Premier League rule is that the lineman fflags but the ref doesn't whistle. And for another thing, if they haven't learned by now that "Play to the Whistle" is the rule, then they wouldn't be bright enough to understand offside anyway.
Golden rule - the linesman cannot give offside. Only the referee can give offside or any other free kick.
I don’t know, I’m probably tying myself up in knots as well but it will take some getting used to.
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
It's not relevant to the players what the referee is doing, except that if he hasn't blown his whistle, the ball is still live. All sorts of annoying things can go wrong, including the linesman waving his flag when he shouldn't, but if the forward is not offside and the ref has not blown his whistle, then tough. They should have known better.Cheshireclaret wrote:I get that and I’m the first to moan when our players switch off and don’t ‘play to the whistle’ but if as the referee one of your assistants has stopped running and put his or her flag in the air, aren’t you compelled to then do something?
I don’t know, I’m probably tying myself up in knots as well but it will take some getting used to.
It could certainly create a problem if the linesman is standing there with his flag up and then there's another offside decision to give, with the linesman nowhere to be seen. I presume then they just take a guess and let VAR back into action. But if the ball goes for a corner when the forward was offside but the lineman in the wrong place, or even worse a free kick in a very dangerous position, which VAR doesn't concern itself with ...
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Football was so simple before VAR ---you just accepted the decision of the onfield officials and get on with the game whether they were right or wrong. However, these new ideas are really improving the enjoyment of the game so we shouldn't complain.dsr wrote:It's not relevant to the players what the referee is doing, except that if he hasn't blown his whistle, the ball is still live. All sorts of annoying things can go wrong, including the linesman waving his flag when he shouldn't, but if the forward is not offside and the ref has not blown his whistle, then tough. They should have known better.
It could certainly create a problem if the linesman is standing there with his flag up and then there's another offside decision to give, with the linesman nowhere to be seen. I presume then they just take a guess and let VAR back into action. But if the ball goes for a corner when the forward was offside but the lineman in the wrong place, or even worse a free kick in a very dangerous position, which VAR doesn't concern itself with ...
I think that that is what I am supposed to think!
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Chelsea v Liverpool - Super Cup
Had chelsea to win on penstim_noone wrote:That non championship "striker" has cost you money......he has hasn't he?