Nathan Wood

fidelcastro · Post by **fidelcastro** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:23 pm

Apologies if already posted by someone else, but just saw this. I can't say I know much about him.

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/foo ... 880793.amp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

tiger76 · Post by **tiger76** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:37 pm

He might have huge potential,but 9 million for a rookie is crazy money for BFC,if we did sign him he'd be for the u23's anyway,no the 1st team squad.

wilks_bfc · Post by **wilks_bfc** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:38 pm

Can’t see us paying £9m for a player that’s yet to play a league game

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:41 pm

More chance of us signing Chris Wood from Burnley.

TheFamilyCat · Post by **TheFamilyCat** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:42 pm

Nathan Woodn’t.

ClaretAndJew · Post by **ClaretAndJew** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:52 pm

We didn't spend that much all summer so to suggest we'll spend that on one player with no league appearances is hilarious.

Ashingtonclaret46 · Post by **Ashingtonclaret46** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 2:59 pm

Perhaps Gibson would like to return home and could be part of a deal --just a thought.

Darthlaw · Post by **Darthlaw** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:02 pm

or perhaps we're lining up Gibson's bench replacement when he steps into Tarks place?

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:11 pm

Teesside Gazette claiming it’s a national report but couldn’t find anything from a reputable source.

fidelcastro · Post by **fidelcastro** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:14 pm

ClaretTony wrote:Teesside Gazette claiming it’s a national report but couldn’t find anything from a reputable source.

You mean the SUN isn't a reputable source?

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:25 pm

fidelcastro wrote:You mean the SUN isn't a reputable source?

It’s from McGrath isn’t it? He doesn’t have a good record with his Burnley speculation.

fidelcastro · Post by **fidelcastro** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:27 pm

ClaretTony wrote:It’s from McGrath isn’t it? He doesn’t have a good record with his Burnley speculation.

No idea, just caught the bit that mentions the scousers' favourite paper.

Grumps · Post by **Grumps** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:30 pm

It's in today's paper, but no author given

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:33 pm

Grumps wrote:It's in today's paper, but no author given

Mike McGrath last night in the aforementioned rag

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:42 pm

Hed only be offside...

bobinho · Post by **bobinho** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:43 pm

Can't understand why so many are thinking we won't pay this much for a youngster?

We have form paying £15m for a bench warmer...

Foulthrow · Post by **Foulthrow** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 5:53 pm

Woods.

boatshed bill · Post by **boatshed bill** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 5:55 pm

"Can't understand why so many are thinking we won't pay this much for a youngster?

If the management sees something in him that they believe they can develop then why not?

gsyclaret · Post by **gsyclaret** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 5:59 pm

Could be a good prospect, tried to sign him in the summer.

claptrappers_union · Post by **claptrappers_union** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:02 pm

£9m? Probably more like £90,000

Danieljwaterhouse · Post by **Danieljwaterhouse** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:45 pm

claptrappers_union wrote:£9m? Probably more like £90,000

It’s feasible Long, Tarks or Gibson could go in Jan so why wouldn’t we be looking?

elwaclaret · Post by **elwaclaret** » Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:55 pm

Not beyond the realms of all possibility, but most of it. Quiet news day, and an agent building his investment.

Nathan Wood

Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood

Re: Nathan Wood