Is 433 A Better System Right Now
-
- Posts: 6688
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1699 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Is 433 A Better System Right Now
We rarely change from 442, but compared to last year we are in a better position to deploy a 433
Drinkwater when fit could drop in to it. We have Cork, Westwood Hendrick all capable as well.mMaybe start 442 as SD seems hell-bent on it, but if playing poor swicth to it sooner rather than later , It may suit us to start with this v the top 6 teams
Drinkwater when fit could drop in to it. We have Cork, Westwood Hendrick all capable as well.mMaybe start 442 as SD seems hell-bent on it, but if playing poor swicth to it sooner rather than later , It may suit us to start with this v the top 6 teams
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
Far too complicated for a simple minded Burnley fan like me.
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
Simple answer is no. We looked completely disorganised when we switched today.
We would get overrun playing 4-3-3 against the top 6.
We would get overrun playing 4-3-3 against the top 6.
-
- Posts: 6688
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1699 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
Fair point-I was not there today. Guess we have not practiced it enough
-
- Posts: 11530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3189 times
- Has Liked: 1870 times
- Contact:
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
I think 443 works better tbh
That would stop us being overrun in midfield
That would stop us being overrun in midfield
- Attachments
-
- 6049B643-0D44-4D82-9F13-A2CC9AADBDEA.jpeg (121.07 KiB) Viewed 1631 times
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
4 4 3 means we have 12 players on the pitch.
-
- Posts: 11530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3189 times
- Has Liked: 1870 times
- Contact:
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
ClaretAndJew wrote:4 4 3 means we have 12 players on the pitch.
Well the referee never noticed
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
No
Our midfield is weak and lacking pace when there are four players in there
Drop down to three and we will be completely overrun
All that system will give us is more "hoof" ball tactics
Our midfield is weak and lacking pace when there are four players in there
Drop down to three and we will be completely overrun
All that system will give us is more "hoof" ball tactics
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
So you are not a fan of SD then?jojomk1 wrote:No
Our midfield is weak and lacking pace when there are four players in there
Drop down to three and we will be completely overrun
All that system will give us is more "hoof" ball tactics
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
I was replying to a question about formations
I also don't think I've seen SD adopt a 443 formation
So he must agree with my assumptions
I also don't think I've seen SD adopt a 443 formation
So he must agree with my assumptions
-
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 935 times
- Has Liked: 608 times
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
If we can get away with a 4-4-3 formation everygame I think we should definitely do it until somebody notices we have 12 players on the pitch.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 8526
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2472 times
- Has Liked: 2009 times
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
One of SDs few weaknesses for me is game management. It went our way today but how many times do we drop points late on because we can't successfully see out a game.
4-4-2 is his way and I have no problem with that but we are a professional sports team and have to be coached in other systems so when the time is right we can adapt. This doesn't seem to be the case.
I would rather we were changing to 5-4-1 to see out a point than 4-3-3 to win one but they should be able to do both.
4-4-2 is his way and I have no problem with that but we are a professional sports team and have to be coached in other systems so when the time is right we can adapt. This doesn't seem to be the case.
I would rather we were changing to 5-4-1 to see out a point than 4-3-3 to win one but they should be able to do both.
Re: Is 433 A Better System Right Now
Noooo surely not ... well I never.... pah somebody slipped up there didn't theyClaretAndJew wrote:4 4 3 means we have 12 players on the pitch.
This user liked this post: wilks_bfc