Dwight starts for under 21s

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ijkay
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 4 times

Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by ijkay » Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:44 pm

Slovenia U21 vs England U21

MrMeeseeks
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:54 pm
Been Liked: 32 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by MrMeeseeks » Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:50 pm

Haven’t seen the first half but read he’s playing left wing back. Is Aidy Boothroyd clinically insane?

giveusaB
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:09 pm
Been Liked: 49 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by giveusaB » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:07 pm

Link to game on Czech v England thread.

Rick_Muller
Posts: 4823
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2157 times
Has Liked: 5192 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rick_Muller » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:14 pm

Been subbed at half time

conyoviejo
Posts: 4102
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 1688 times
Has Liked: 1086 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by conyoviejo » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:16 pm

Rick_Muller wrote:Been subbed at half time
Just a warm up for his appearance later on tonight.. :D

boatshed bill
Posts: 5649
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 1203 times
Has Liked: 2672 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:16 pm

MrMeeseeks wrote:Haven’t seen the first half but read he’s playing left wing back. Is Aidy Boothroyd clinically insane?
Not left wing-back. Just stuck out on the left wing. Most of our play down the right! :x

Paul Waine
Posts: 6177
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 1440 times
Has Liked: 1764 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Paul Waine » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:24 pm

boatshed bill wrote:Not left wing-back. Just stuck out on the left wing. Most of our play down the right! :x
The few minutes I watched I did get a bit of an impression that the other u21s didn't know he was there....
This user liked this post: ngsobob

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 674 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Woodleyclaret » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pm

When Jay made his international appearance Sicknote Jack played several hospital passes and generally steered the play onto the opposite wing
This is probably what happened with the established clique anxious to close ranks.Sad but true
This user liked this post: Shore claret

Stproc
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 84 times
Has Liked: 146 times
Location: Ribble Valley
Contact:

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Stproc » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:57 pm

Seemed to be pretty much ignored by the big club players who played predominantly down the right side. There did appear to be a lot of selfish play going on by some individuals too.

NottsClaret
Posts: 2208
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 1814 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by NottsClaret » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:45 pm

How did Boothroyd get that job? He’s a failed lower league dinosaur.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin

IanMcL
Posts: 18320
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 3634 times
Has Liked: 4242 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by IanMcL » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:08 pm

First you fail....then you are available.

IanMcL
Posts: 18320
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 3634 times
Has Liked: 4242 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by IanMcL » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:09 pm

Stproc wrote:Seemed to be pretty much ignored by the big club players who played predominantly down the right side. There did appear to be a lot of selfish play going on by some individuals too.
Young clique!

Jeremy_Bentham
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:40 pm
Been Liked: 186 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Jeremy_Bentham » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:43 pm

. laughs at the jokers moaning about a clique.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 6622
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 2563 times
Has Liked: 489 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:49 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Thread of the week :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Pimlico_Claret
Posts: 1300
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 574 times
Has Liked: 647 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Pimlico_Claret » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:32 pm

NottsClaret wrote:How did Boothroyd get that job? He’s a failed lower league dinosaur.
Couldn't agree more, typical FA appointment, probably managed to tick all the boxes on the application form without anyone looking at his record.

Braindead
Posts: 1426
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 922 times
Has Liked: 880 times
Location: Yavin 4

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Braindead » Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:00 am

Some whining on here tonight.

It COULD have been a squadwise conspiracy to deliberately starve him of the ball to protect their clique.

Or he might just have been shlte?

Corky
Posts: 1152
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 410 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Corky » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:23 am

Given his experience which is growing weekly playing regularly as he does in the Premiership does McNeil actually get much benefit from playing U21 footy. Wouldn't he be better being in the U23 team/squad.

Rileybobs
Posts: 7793
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3258 times
Has Liked: 747 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:25 am

Corky wrote:Given his experience which is growing weekly playing regularly as he does in the Premiership does McNeil actually get much benefit from playing U21 footy. Wouldn't he be better being in the U23 team/squad.
He’s playing in the under 21 side for England.

boatshed bill
Posts: 5649
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 1203 times
Has Liked: 2672 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Oct 12, 2019 11:27 am

Braindead wrote:Some whining on here tonight.

It COULD have been a squadwise conspiracy to deliberately starve him of the ball to protect their clique.

Or he might just have been shlte?
I'd say neither.
I'd guess that he stuck to his wing as per game plan. Just that much of the build up play came via the right back and Foden, who played advanced right midfield.

FCBurnley
Posts: 4361
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 922 times
Has Liked: 517 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by FCBurnley » Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:22 pm

At least he didn’t get injured

Corky
Posts: 1152
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 410 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Corky » Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:47 pm

Rileybobs wrote:He’s playing in the under 21 side for England.
Correct; now what exactly have you got to offer to the debate or are you just being obtuse.

Rileybobs
Posts: 7793
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3258 times
Has Liked: 747 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:04 pm

Corky wrote:Correct; now what exactly have you got to offer to the debate or are you just being obtuse.
Just wondering how you think he would be better playing for Burnley’s under 23 side when he’s a regular starter for the first team, instead of representing his country at under 21 level? Not sure what’s obtuse about that?

Corky
Posts: 1152
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 410 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Corky » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:54 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Just wondering how you think he would be better playing for Burnley’s under 23 side when he’s a regular starter for the first team, instead of representing his country at under 21 level? Not sure what’s obtuse about that?
Well done sir that is a textbook example of being obtuse.

fidelcastro
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 1140 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:01 pm

Corky wrote:Well done sir that is a textbook example of being obtuse.
You really think our U23 team level would benefit him more than playing for England U21?

:?

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 1144
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 240 times
Has Liked: 325 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Darnhill Claret » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:01 pm

Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

fidelcastro
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 1140 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:03 pm

Darnhill Claret wrote:Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
Our U23 team must be of a higher calibre than I thought then.

:shock:

wilks_bfc
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 862 times
Contact:

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:07 pm

Tbh I don’t think Dwight will ever play for the England U23’s

fidelcastro
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 1140 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:11 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:Tbh I don’t think Dwight will ever play for the England U23’s
We were talking about Burnley's U23 team.

Although perhaps you already knew that? :?

boatshed bill
Posts: 5649
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 1203 times
Has Liked: 2672 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:13 pm

He didn't show very well, but for Burnley he very often picks the ball up and runs from much deeper. Being used exclusively as a left winger didn't do him any favours.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 753 times
Has Liked: 1641 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:14 pm

When the likes of Heaton go off to train with the England squad and make the odd appearance it's generally accepted that it's a good thing to do, in regards experience, training/Playing with other/better players.

What I'm seeing here is someone asking if Dwight is better off staying with Burnley's U23 team, many of whom won't make Burnley's first team, over playing with England's U21 team and many of them are playing regular first team football in the PL or championship.

Am I being obtuse, or is it just a daft opinion?
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

wilks_bfc
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 862 times
Contact:

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:20 pm

fidelcastro wrote:We were talking about Burnley's U23 team.

Although perhaps you already knew that? :?

I didn’t actually.

But know I do I’m not sure Dwight would learn anything more about himself playing 90mins against Wigan u23 than he would in the experience of 45mins against Slovenia away

fidelcastro
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 1140 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:25 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:I didn’t actually.

But know I do I’m not sure Dwight would learn anything more about himself playing 90mins against Wigan u23 than he would in the experience of 45mins against Slovenia away
And here was me thinking that players thought it an honour to represent their country (albeit at an age restricted level).

Burnley reserves it is then! :lol:

wilks_bfc
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 862 times
Contact:

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:28 pm

fidelcastro wrote:And here was me thinking that players thought it an honour to represent their country (albeit at an age restricted level).

Burnley reserves it is then! :lol:

I’m with you on that - if I wasn’t clear I’m blaming the cold/flu capsules I’ve been popping today :lol:

Rileybobs
Posts: 7793
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3258 times
Has Liked: 747 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:33 pm

Corky wrote:Well done sir that is a textbook example of being obtuse.
Am I missing something here? I queried your first post because I thought that you were maybe mistaken and thought that England had an under 23 side. Turns out you weren’t mistaken but in fact think that it is beneficial for a Premier League first team regular to play for his club’s under 23 side than at international under 21 level.

Then you call me obtuse and follow it up with another unnecessarily curt response.

It’s hardly worth debating because you are obviously so clearly wrong - but apart from the huge difference in standard between a club U23 and international U21 level - do you think that McNeill turning down an opportunity to represent his country at U21 level may impact his chances of ever being deemed fit to gain a full international cap?

I can’t believe how daft your point is.
These 2 users liked this post: wilks_bfc Buxtonclaret

bfcmik
Posts: 2309
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
Been Liked: 603 times
Has Liked: 648 times
Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by bfcmik » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:35 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:I didn’t actually.

But know I do I’m not sure Dwight would learn anything more about himself playing 90mins against Wigan u23 than he would in the experience of 45mins against Slovenia away
And the training with the full England squad for 2 days as well
This user liked this post: wilks_bfc

wilks_bfc
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 862 times
Contact:

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:46 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Am I missing something here? I queried your first post because I thought that you were maybe mistaken and thought that England had an under 23 side. Turns out you weren’t mistaken but in fact think that it is beneficial for a Premier League first team regular to play for his club’s under 23 side than at international under 21 level.

Then you call me obtuse and follow it up with another unnecessarily curt response.

It’s hardly worth debating because you are obviously so clearly wrong - but apart from the huge difference in standard between a club U23 and international U21 level - do you think that McNeill turning down an opportunity to represent his country at U21 level may impact his chances of ever being deemed fit to gain a full international cap?

I can’t believe how daft your point is.
So I wasn’t the only one that thought that then

bfcmik
Posts: 2309
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
Been Liked: 603 times
Has Liked: 648 times
Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by bfcmik » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:54 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:So I wasn’t the only one that thought that then
No, you weren't.

Rileybobs
Posts: 7793
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3258 times
Has Liked: 747 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:55 pm

Stop being obtuse guys.

Corky
Posts: 1152
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 410 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Corky » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:48 am

Rileybobs wrote:Stop being obtuse guys.
I apologies unreservedly. Football isn't my main passion and I genuinely thought England had an U23 set up. I'll get back to my music. Sorry and all that. You were still obtuse though :lol:

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 10025
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 2244 times
Has Liked: 1258 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:16 am

I think U23s section was invented by the premier league to stop young lads thinking they're failures when they haven't made a first team appearance by 23.

Do any other sports have one? Or just compete against adults when you become one?

Helmshore Claret
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:16 am
Been Liked: 30 times
Has Liked: 65 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Helmshore Claret » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:32 pm

Since last New Year's Eve McNeil has been 'murdering' full backs in the Premier League. Whilst he was doing this Mason Mount was plying his trade in the Championship. The discrimination shown by successive England managers towards 'unfashionable' Burnley continues; Angus,Pointer, O'Neil and others never got a 'fair crack of the whip' and I am certain that should Dwight sign for 'Frank Lampard's ' Chelsea he would be in the full England squad immediately. Just hope he stays free from injury in this boring international break.

Rileybobs
Posts: 7793
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3258 times
Has Liked: 747 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:16 pm

Helmshore Claret wrote:Since last New Year's Eve McNeil has been 'murdering' full backs in the Premier League. Whilst he was doing this Mason Mount was plying his trade in the Championship. The discrimination shown by successive England managers towards 'unfashionable' Burnley continues; Angus,Pointer, O'Neil and others never got a 'fair crack of the whip' and I am certain that should Dwight sign for 'Frank Lampard's ' Chelsea he would be in the full England squad immediately. Just hope he stays free from injury in this boring international break.
Mason Mount has scored 4 PL goals this season, that’s 4 more than McNeill. Maybe Mount is just better than McNeill and that’s why he’s being selected for England. Either that or Southgate is intentionally sabotaging his own livelihood by not picking the best players available to him because he hates unfashionable Burnley (despite strangely giving 3 Burnley players their international debut since becoming England manager).

SGr
Posts: 3753
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 874 times
Has Liked: 295 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by SGr » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:54 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Mason Mount has scored 4 PL goals this season, that’s 4 more than McNeill. Maybe Mount is just better than McNeill and that’s why he’s being selected for England. Either that or Southgate is intentionally sabotaging his own livelihood by not picking the best players available to him because he hates unfashionable Burnley (despite strangely giving 3 Burnley players their international debut since becoming England manager).
Chances are Mount is a better footballer, but Southgate certainly has his agendas. Just look at his sheer refusal of late to select James Maddison, who’s better than both of them, for example.

Rileybobs
Posts: 7793
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 3258 times
Has Liked: 747 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:29 pm

SGr wrote:Chances are Mount is a better footballer, but Southgate certainly has his agendas. Just look at his sheer refusal of late to select James Maddison, who’s better than both of them, for example.
Maybe there's something that Southgate doesn't like about Maddison - why would he prefer to select inferior players who play for bigger teams? There's no reason why he'd do that. He's proven fairly consistently that if a player impresses for his club in the PL he will select them.

Obviously there will be the odd head-scratcher and there will be players out of form who are still selected - after all, he's not going to drop our key players if they're having a poor couple of months at club level. But largely, Southgate has demonstrated that he will select players who are playing well for their clubs regardless of age and status of club. He's done that more than any England manager that I can remember so it seems a very odd thing to call him out for.

SGr
Posts: 3753
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 874 times
Has Liked: 295 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by SGr » Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:41 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Maybe there's something that Southgate doesn't like about Maddison - why would he prefer to select inferior players who play for bigger teams? There's no reason why he'd do that. He's proven fairly consistently that if a player impresses for his club in the PL he will select them.

Obviously there will be the odd head-scratcher and there will be players out of form who are still selected - after all, he's not going to drop our key players if they're having a poor couple of months at club level. But largely, Southgate has demonstrated that he will select players who are playing well for their clubs regardless of age and status of club. He's done that more than any England manager that I can remember so it seems a very odd thing to call him out for.
He’s not above criticism when it comes to selections. Yes, largely he has shown that he can select players based on form, but Maddison created more chances than any other player in the league last season. This is the best England squad in a long time, but look at who we’re up against in the sheet quality of France, or the proven winners that are Portugal for example - we can’t afford to have “the odd head scratcher”. This nation needs a major tournament. You pick your best available side, and that’s it.

I’m not against a hard working system player - France were starting Matuidi at left mid during their WC win. But playing Ross Barkley over James Maddison for example isn’t justifiable, not at all.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 10025
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 2244 times
Has Liked: 1258 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:19 am

SGr wrote:Chances are Mount is a better footballer, but Southgate certainly has his agendas. Just look at his sheer refusal of late to select James Maddison, who’s better than both of them, for example.
Maddison pulled out of the squad this time, but I agree he should be given a chance.

aggi
Posts: 5669
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 1333 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by aggi » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:16 am

SGr wrote:Chances are Mount is a better footballer, but Southgate certainly has his agendas. Just look at his sheer refusal of late to select James Maddison, who’s better than both of them, for example.
Southgate called up Madison but he pulled out with injury.

FactualFrank
Posts: 20415
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 5676 times
Has Liked: 9670 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by FactualFrank » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:17 am

SGr wrote:Chances are Mount is a better footballer, but Southgate certainly has his agendas. Just look at his sheer refusal of late to select James Maddison, who’s better than both of them, for example.
Wasn't Maddison selected, but was withdrawn due to injury?

TVC15
Posts: 7515
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 2982 times
Has Liked: 545 times

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by TVC15 » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:58 am

FactualFrank wrote:Wasn't Maddison selected, but was withdrawn due to injury?
Yep that’s right - withdrew due to illness actually and was then pictured in a casino....mmmm ?!!

Maddison is a good player for sure - but he seems a bit of a cocky arrogant git to me....no doubt he’ll play and score against us on Saturday though !!
Leicester look very strong this year and think they have a great shout for top 4 with the likes of United, Spurs, Arsenal not looking great

FactualFrank
Posts: 20415
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 5676 times
Has Liked: 9670 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Dwight starts for under 21s

Post by FactualFrank » Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:00 pm

TVC15 wrote:Yep that’s right - withdrew due to illness actually and was then pictured in a casino....mmmm ?!!

Maddison is a good player for sure - but he seems a bit of a cocky arrogant git to me....no doubt he’ll play and score against us on Saturday though !!
Leicester look very strong this year and think they have a great shout for top 4 with the likes of United, Spurs, Arsenal not looking great
Leicester and Brendan Rodgers are a perfect match. They have the players and he's a top manager. I think top 4 is nailed on.

Post Reply