Leicester City v .MIGHTY CLARETS

ceborame · Post by **ceborame** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:50 pm

I'm watching a HD stream and the ball definitely wasn't in the net when the 'trip' happened

But also I don't see any contact from Wood

MACCA · Post by **MACCA** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:51 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:To me it looked like Evans tripped himself up

That doesn't fit the Leicester farytail on their special day....

A joke of a decision

icu81b4 · Post by **icu81b4** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:51 pm

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:51 pm

scouseclaret wrote:Because e ball is already in the net when he trips himself up, clearly.

Are you even a f***ing Burnley fan, dickhead?

I love it. I have a different opinion and i get called a dickhead and my support is questioned

Can you imagine if i did that? You ******* people would be smashing that report button so ******* fast

Funkydrummer · Post by **Funkydrummer** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:51 pm

None of it really matters, they'll do what they want, when they want.

Kgun5 · Post by **Kgun5** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:51 pm

FT...Disappointing.

thatdberight · Post by **thatdberight** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:52 pm

Garth Crooks adds his usual sensible contribution...
"Sean Dyche is furious but it looks like is it is a push. You can see that Jonny Evans says straight away that he was pushed in the back. If he was not pushed, he would have cleared it. That's what VAR is for but for me that is a goal. I feel like that they have interpreted it wrong. I think Sean Dyche has every right to be furious."

So it is a push. If he wasn't pushed it would have been cleared. That's what VAR is for. But, hang on, it should be a goal. And it's been misinterpreted.

VAR will have to go some to come up with anything more baffling than how Garth Crooks keeps his job...

Tricky Trevor · Post by **Tricky Trevor** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:52 pm

Spurs go above us with another contentious VAR goal.

tiger76 · Post by **tiger76** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:52 pm

I'm

Tottenham get a tight VAR call go their way robbing Watford of 2 precious points,at least it's clear who the powers that be favour,like we didn't know in the first place.

Tricky Trevor · Post by **Tricky Trevor** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:52 pm

Hapag Lloyd · Post by **Hapag Lloyd** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:52 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Wood tripped him. I'm not sure why you lot are being so hysterical over it.

Anywhere else on the pitch it'd be a foul and none of you would have a problem with it.

Why on earth is this tosspot tolerated on here, ***** like this will kill this board.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:53 pm

thatdberight wrote:Garth Crooks adds his usual sensible contribution...
"Sean Dyche is furious but it looks like is it is a push. You can see that Jonny Evans says straight away that he was pushed in the back. If he was not pushed, he would have cleared it. That's what VAR is for but for me that is a goal. I feel like that they have interpreted it wrong. I think Sean Dyche has every right to be furious."

So it is a push. If he wasn't pushed it would have been cleared. That's what VAR is for. But, hang on, it should be a goal. And it's been misinterpreted.

VAR will have to go some to come up with anything more baffling than how Garth Crooks keeps his job...

He's an idiot. There was no push. Wood tripped him.

Burnley1989 · Post by **Burnley1989** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:53 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Wood tripped him. I'm not sure why you lot are being so hysterical over it.

Anywhere else on the pitch it'd be a foul and none of you would have a problem with it.

Haven’t seen it but I’d have put my house on you disagreeing with the rest

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:53 pm

Hapag Lloyd wrote:Why on earth is this tosspot tolerated on here, ***** like this will kill this board.

Different views will kill this board, guys.

Everyone must fall in line.

Buxtonclaret · Post by **Buxtonclaret** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:53 pm

We've been well and truly shafted.
Should never have been disallowed.

ksrclaret · Post by **ksrclaret** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:53 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I love it. I have a different opinion and i get called a dickhead and my support is questioned Can you imagine if i did that? You ******* people would be smashing that report button so ******* fast

You don't have an opinion either way because your knowledge, on the matter of football, isn't strong enough. You're just here to see who you can wind up.

It worked to be fair.

Tread Warily · Post by **Tread Warily** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:54 pm

The thirteenth man won it for them,brown envelope before the match.

ClaretSam92 · Post by **ClaretSam92** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:54 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I love it. I have a different opinion and i get called a dickhead and my support is questioned Can you imagine if i did that? You ******* people would be smashing that report button so ******* fast

You are a dick head

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:54 pm

ClaretSam92 wrote:You are a dick head

I'm not denying that. I'm just pointing out the double standard.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:54 pm

Never, in a million years, was he ever going to get that ball from out of the net.

'Kin daylight robbery.

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:54 pm

Moss set the tone on first minute when he booked Hendrick. Barely a foul by us in the game and we had 4 booked I think.

Kgun5 · Post by **Kgun5** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:55 pm

It really comes down to this, for me: Burnley does NOT get that call.

If you believe that, you can only see VAR as another way to screw the little guy.

wilks_bfc · Post by **wilks_bfc** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:55 pm

thatdberight wrote:Garth Crooks adds his usual sensible contribution...
"Sean Dyche is furious but it looks like is it is a push. You can see that Jonny Evans says straight away that he was pushed in the back. If he was not pushed, he would have cleared it. That's what VAR is for but for me that is a goal. I feel like that they have interpreted it wrong. I think Sean Dyche has every right to be furious."

So it is a push. If he wasn't pushed it would have been cleared. That's what VAR is for. But, hang on, it should be a goal. And it's been misinterpreted.

VAR will have to go some to come up with anything more baffling than how Garth Crooks keeps his job...

But if it was foul it was for a trip and not a push

ClaretSam92 · Post by **ClaretSam92** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:56 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I'm not denying that. I'm just pointing out the double standard.

No double standard... I'm surprised you aren't blaming dyche for VAR. Its the usual kind of crap you come out with.

Hapag Lloyd · Post by **Hapag Lloyd** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:56 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Different views will kill this board, guys.

Everyone must fall in line.

No wankpieces like you who just want an argument will.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:56 pm

ksrclaret wrote:You don't have an opinion either way because your knowledge, on the matter of football, isn't strong enough. You're just here to see who you can wind up.

It worked to be fair.

My knowledge seems to at least understand that you're not allowed to trip your opponents. Maybe more of you lot on here should learn what constitutes a foul.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:57 pm

ClaretSam92 wrote:No double standard... I'm surprised you aren't blaming dyche for VAR. Its the usual kind of crap you come out with.

Now you're just getting desperate. We lost. Get over it. Grow up.

clansman · Post by **clansman** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:57 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I'm not denying that. I'm just pointing out the double standard.

Imploding turtle , contentious argumentative and always wrong. It was clearly a legitimate goal. Var will be under intense scrutiny after this. Absolutely disgraceful decision and not one football pundit will defend it.

Corky · Post by **Corky** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:58 pm

I believe that Garth Crook is ITs script writer.

ClaretSam92 · Post by **ClaretSam92** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:58 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Now you're just getting desperate. We lost. Get over it. Grow up.

what a prick

Lancasterclaret · Post by **Lancasterclaret** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:58 pm

Haven't seen it, but it seems pretty unanimous that this is a poor decision.

If its a trip, its a trip, if it isn't, it isn't.

If its too hard to see what it is, then the original decision stands.

Doesn't sound that hard does it?

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:58 pm

Hapag Lloyd wrote:No wankpieces like you who just want an argument will.

I didn't want an argument, i just mistakenly thought i had every much a right to express my opinion as the rest of you. I guess i at least got that wrong.

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:59 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I'm not denying that. I'm just pointing out the double standard.

Crawl back under your freaking rock

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:00 pm

It's up there with the non-award of the penalty for the foul on Barnes recently. It really is that poor

clansman · Post by **clansman** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:00 pm

You are an argumentative tosser IT

Hapag Lloyd · Post by **Hapag Lloyd** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:00 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I didn't want an argument

First time ever then.

Spijed · Post by **Spijed** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:00 pm

Played well. Didn't deserve that.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:01 pm

clansman wrote:You are an argumentative tosser IT

Sick burn.

ksrclaret · Post by **ksrclaret** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:01 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:My knowledge seems to at least understand that you're not allowed to trip your opponents. Maybe more of you lot on here should learn what constitutes a foul.

Your knowledge at least gives you the ammunition to troll this board. No more no less.

clansman · Post by **clansman** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:02 pm

What the hell does that mean you weirdo

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:02 pm

ksrclaret wrote:Your knowledge at least gives you the ammunition to troll this board. No more no less.

No knowledge?

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:03 pm

Having seen the replay after the game, I think I agree with IT that Evans was tripped.

However, the way VAR has been used this season it shouldn't have been disallowed.

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:04 pm

Just for clarity wood touched Evans back foot. Evans threw himself down. The ball was already on or over the line and would have been an Evans oh. Once the ball came off Evans he had zero chance of stopping the goal. If you want to see bias look at our car decision and the 2 at spurs

Shore claret · Post by **Shore claret** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:04 pm

I knew there would be one maybe two posters going against everyone else, amazingly I guessed the right poster just waiting for the other one to pop up and say black is white.

Stayingup · Post by **Stayingup** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:05 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Different views will kill this board, guys.

Everyone must fall in line.

Your entitled to your opinion just as some posters are entitled to their opiniins about you.

But surely even you can see that fans are upset as they think we have been robbed - again. So just leave it alone and shut up. Youve made your point.

tiger76 · Post by **tiger76** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:05 pm

Just browsing the BBC text feed and VAR will dominate MOTD if that's any indication of events,Watford can definitely feel aggrieved 2 big calls wrongly going against them,it must be a coincidence that the majority of contentious VAR decisions go for the precieved 'big' clubs.

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:05 pm

Stayingup wrote:Your entitled to your opinion just as some posters are entitled to their opiniins about you.

But surely even you can see that fans are upset as they think we have been robbed - again. So just leave it alone and shut up. Youve made your point.

He timed it for a reason.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:06 pm

Stayingup wrote:Your entitled to your opinion just as some posters are entitled to their opiniins about you.

But surely even you can see that fans are upset as they think we have been robbed - again. So just leave it alone and shut up. Youve made your point.

Of course they are. But i'm not entitled to post my opinions about you because when I do it i get banned.

jrgbfc · Post by **jrgbfc** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:07 pm

Away from VAR how did Pieters play today?

BertiesBeehole · Post by **BertiesBeehole** » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:08 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I love it. I have a different opinion and i get called a dickhead and my support is questioned Can you imagine if i did that? You ******* people would be smashing that report button so ******* fast

More the fact your response to the VAR decision was just a laughing emoji. Think that’s why most of us realise you’re not a Burnley fan. Or if you are not the kind of fan most of us would want to be.