Man U vs Liverpool
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
time to pull the plug on VAR, incompetent beyond belief
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Darnhill Claret wrote:I’m assuming the goal was allowed to stand as the foul was in the other half of the pitch and probably deemed to be another phase of play. Decisions have to be made although such decisions only add to the confusion.
A foul is a foul, the ref blows. It's a free kick liverpool, what happens after is irrelevant.
Why they arent using the screen at the side of pitch must only be to shift the blame/decision to the VAR
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Both the Burnley goal yesterday and the United goal today should have had the same VAR decision. That is where the game is crooked
These 2 users liked this post: Lowbankclaret Foulthrow
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
The foul was right in front of Atkinson. He decided no foul. Right or wrong, that is the end if it, as it was up the pitch. Happens all the time. Goal should count.
Liverpool, arm helped, inadvertently, to control the ball. No goal.
Tough life.
Liverpool, arm helped, inadvertently, to control the ball. No goal.
Tough life.
These 2 users liked this post: Darnhill Claret Stalbansclaret
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
I think we are all agreed if that United goal stands then so should ours I'm listening to 5 live Savage is making reference to Watfords VAR he hasn't mentioned what happened at the King Power and I doubt if he will.
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
The idea of VAR is a good one but the people operating it and making the decisions are really poor. Why cannot the refs use the pitch-side screens.
also wonder why the decisions cannot latter be explained so that we supporters can understand why the decisions were made.
also wonder why the decisions cannot latter be explained so that we supporters can understand why the decisions were made.
This user liked this post: LordBob
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
It doesn't have to be deliberate for it to be a foul.Texanclaret16 wrote:Wow this VAR is unreal my thoughts are that it’s only a handball if it’s deliberate or your arm is in a unnatural position for me I’m not sure if his arm was in a unnatural position and it definitely wasn’t deliberate I’ve played football for 30 years plus and there is no way you can get your arm/hand away sometimes yet again controversial decision for me could have gone 50/50 if it was a defender would a pen be given hmmmmmm not sure but at least it’s livened up a very poor game Liverpool have looks $hit
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Loads of reasons why they did not give a foul.
Infact about 78,000 reasons
Infact about 78,000 reasons
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
VAR got most things wrong yesterday but it did get those two decisions correct.
Still want it scrapped immediately though, we may as well just flip a coin for each VAR call.
Still want it scrapped immediately though, we may as well just flip a coin for each VAR call.
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
There was contact in both incidents.taio wrote:I'd say there was a difference. Today's was a foul.
Just saying should be the same outcome either way as long as it’s consistent I would be ok with it.
-
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 445 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
- Location: Manchester
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Did I hear right what Neville just said
‘ they only had introduced VAR so Man Utd can win’
Was he joking or speaking from a position of knowledge
‘ they only had introduced VAR so Man Utd can win’
Was he joking or speaking from a position of knowledge
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
You are correct, it caught his arm, but he was turning to his right, he needed his arm there to keep his balance, I like you, played football till I was 46 and these sort of decisions make my blood boil, as did yesterdays.Texanclaret16 wrote:Wow this VAR is unreal my thoughts are that it’s only a handball if it’s deliberate or your arm is in a unnatural position for me I’m not sure if his arm was in a unnatural position and it definitely wasn’t deliberate I’ve played football for 30 years plus and there is no way you can get your arm/hand away sometimes yet again controversial decision for me could have gone 50/50 if it was a defender would a pen be given hmmmmmm not sure but at least it’s livened up a very poor game Liverpool have looks $hit
This user liked this post: Texanclaret16
-
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
It's a waste of money and resources that could be better spent elsewhere
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
It wasn't a foul. Origi miscontrolled it, felt a touch on his leg and threw himself to the floor.
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Are you sure? Isn't it called deliberate handball?taio wrote:It doesn't have to be deliberate for it to be a foul.
Not being a dick, genuine question.
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Also works if you substitute Origi with Evans...Sproggy wrote:It wasn't a foul. Origi miscontrolled it, felt a touch on his leg and threw himself to the floor.
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
So did EvansSproggy wrote:It wasn't a foul. Origi miscontrolled it, felt a touch on his leg and threw himself to the floor.
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
At least in previous seasons you could excuse inconsistent decisions by understanding that the referee only sees it once, probably didn’t have as good a view as the tv audience, etc. Now you can’t and that just makes it doubly frustrating. Use VAR for obvious offside errors but leave everything else to the on pitch officials, VAR is making little difference elsewhere.
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 8:34 pm
- Been Liked: 34 times
- Has Liked: 31 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
In exactly the same way Evans knew he was never clearing the ball felt a touch threw himself to the floor and cried to the ref. The biggest gripe and complaint about VAR is consistency of decisions.Sproggy wrote:It wasn't a foul. Origi miscontrolled it, felt a touch on his leg and threw himself to the floor.
Simply put there isn’t any.
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
I agree, 'ball to hand' not 'hand to ball' but who knows what's allowed these days and what isn't, the officials certainly aren't consistent.wilks_bfc wrote:I know there’s new rule in about handball, but that wasn’t intentional and it didn’t alter the flight or control of the ball
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
The only reason I can think of why the referee isn't using the pitch side screen is to shift the decision/blame onto the VAR.BigF wrote:The idea of VAR is a good one but the people operating it and making the decisions are really poor. Why cannot the refs use the pitch-side screens.
also wonder why the decisions cannot latter be explained so that we supporters can understand why the decisions were made.
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
New rule this season for goals scored following use of hand/arm.Claretmatt4 wrote:Are you sure? Isn't it called deliberate handball?
Not being a dick, genuine question.
These 2 users liked this post: Darnhill Claret nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 8:34 pm
- Been Liked: 34 times
- Has Liked: 31 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
taio wrote:New rule this season for goals scored following use of hand/arm.
I also didn’t know this, but surly got to be used in all circumstances not just goals scored if a defender does this is it a pen I hope so for consistency.
Back to the game Citeh must be running scared can’t say I’ve seen Liverpool play well consistently over the past 5 games long long way to go. Neither of these teams should have any bearing on where we finish so I wanted a entertaining game hope the 2nd half is better.
-
- Posts: 11530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3189 times
- Has Liked: 1870 times
- Contact:
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Atkinson now stopping the game for a “non head injury” as Liverpool look to break
Another inconsistency
Another inconsistency
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Think they are just making the rules up as they go a long. Thought no stoppage unless a head injury. He was winded for fcuk sake, and after treatment stayed on the field...
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
The difference is that Atkinson was looking straight at the incident today and didn't deem it a foul whereas Moss completely missed it yesterday. It's not right, but that's how it's being operated.Lowbankclaret wrote:There was contact in both incidents.
Just saying should be the same outcome either way as long as it’s consistent I would be ok with it.
-
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Texanclaret, ‘deliberate handball’ still applies except if it is considered to assist in the scoring of a goal, when it does not require a judgement of ‘deliberate or not’. So if it strikes a defenders hand/arm it has to be deliberate, whereas it is an offence if it strikes an attackers hand/arm. Hope that helps.
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Still, not matter of the position of the ref.Tall Paul wrote:The difference is that Atkinson was looking straight at the incident today and didn't deem it a foul whereas Moss completely missed it yesterday. It's not right, but that's how it's being operated.
Both incidents should get the same decision. IMHO.
-
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Oh Texan, think it also includes, does not need to be deliberate if the ball would have gone into the net, so if you are on the line and it hits your arm/hand a penalty will be awarded.
This user liked this post: CombatClaret
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
I tend to agree, but that's not how it's being used (and I can understand why) so that's the difference between the two incidents.Lowbankclaret wrote:Still, not matter of the position of the ref.
Both incidents should get the same decision. IMHO.
-
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
One resulted in the immediate scoring of a goal and today’s didn’t. Fine margins and all that. Is it any wonder that refs get it wrong?
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Tall Paul wrote:I tend to agree, but that's not how it's being used (and I can understand why) so that's the difference between the two incidents.
I agree, and fully accept your point.
This user liked this post: Tall Paul
-
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Stoppages for injury will be at the discretion of the referee, but referees are instructed to stop all incidents where he/she believes there is a possible head injury. Which is slightly different.
-
- Posts: 18005
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
1-1 and that'll count.
-
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
It is the players who are not required to stop playing unless the ref blows or they believe that there is a head injury.
-
- Posts: 6418
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Savage just said on radio:
if a team like Burnley produced the performance Utd did - it would be called 'anti-football'!
didn't think they played that well!
da da da da da da...anti-football!
if a team like Burnley produced the performance Utd did - it would be called 'anti-football'!
didn't think they played that well!
da da da da da da...anti-football!
These 2 users liked this post: morpheus2 Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Man U vs Liverpool
Not a fan of either, but certainly not United our greatest rivals depending on what side of the Moor you live