Take a wild guess, IT.Imploding Turtle wrote:It's pretty bad that it's not clear whether you're joking, or whether you're being openly and proudly racist.
Gotta love the lad's anger at being shown up for what he is.
Take a wild guess, IT.Imploding Turtle wrote:It's pretty bad that it's not clear whether you're joking, or whether you're being openly and proudly racist.
Come on Turtle, you couldn't slap anybody about.Imploding Turtle wrote:No. Slapping racists around is always worth it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7voD-aHiH4w" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Quickenthetempo wrote:Come on Turtle, you couldn't slap anybody about.
The only thing that will prove it out is the test of time, when the next caliphate gets a foothold.Hipper wrote:How do you know all this?
I agree that she probably wants to come back for safety reasons, not to mention that her family is here, but don't know what her future thoughts are. It could well be she's made a massive error of judgement when she was 15, and like other 15 year olds who make mistakes, we like to give them another chance. We should do so in this case unless there is any evidence that she truly is an individual who is or will be a danger to the rest of us.
None. It'll be us, removing our own freedoms, that do it for them.ClaretAndJew wrote:Considering that Muslims are 2% of the entire population, what chance do they have at making a caliphate?
We're denying muslims the same legal rights as the rest of us and you think that we're winning? How can we be winning when we're giving them what they want?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Like any losing side in a fight/war, they suddenly repent and want to be treated fairly regardless of whatever crimes against humanity they've either committed or helped commit.
...
Where did I say 'we' were winning?Imploding Turtle wrote:We're denying muslims the same legal rights as the rest of us and you think that we're winning? How can we be winning when we're giving them what they want?
We haven't sent anyone to their death in this instance.Burnley1989 wrote:It’s crazy we talk of inhumane acts done by IS but would send someone to be tortured! I have zero sympathy or care for the women but I’d be 100% against sending her to death.
"they"Lowbankclaret wrote:Even in the UK they want Sharia Law to be used not UK law. And I think they will get their way in 30-40 years.
As always it’s not all. Not sure you will find anywhere in history where all people were one the same side.willsclarets wrote:"they"
All 2.66 million of them? Who carried out the exhaustive survey? Or, are you making it up?
What is it that makes you think in 30 or 40 years time that they'll get Sharia Law to replace UK law?Lowbankclaret wrote:As always it’s not all. Not sure you will find anywhere in history where all people were one the same side.
There were plenty in the uk didn’t want us fighting Nazi Germany.
So no not all.
If she is no longer a British subject, and is in a foreign land why should she be tried here?Imploding Turtle wrote:Even if that's true, which i seriously doubt, it doesn't matter. We're not supposed to be the kind of society who denies some people a fair trial. For some reason you think we should be, but only for certain *types* of people.
I think she's every bit as much a piece of **** as you do, the difference between you and I though is that I actually value the principles our country claims to stand for. Why don't you?
Based on a poll by ICM in 2016, they found that 23% of muslims supported Sharia Law 'in some areas of Britain'. Some other findings:Lowbankclaret wrote:As always it’s not all. Not sure you will find anywhere in history where all people were one the same side.
There were plenty in the uk didn’t want us fighting Nazi Germany.
So no not all.
“Human Rights vermin lawyers” - until one of them upholds your human rights.Blackrod wrote:If her citizenship is stripped so say her human right vermin lawyers. A four day hearing taking place at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. The only people who will benefit from her coming back are her family and her lawyers. The rest of the country won’t.
What do you think a human rights lawyers MO is?AndrewJB wrote:“Human Rights vermin lawyers” - until one of them upholds your human rights.
Stripping her of her citizenship was an extrajudicial punishment and in violation of the principles we pretend to hold.elwaclaret wrote:If she is no longer a British subject, and is in a foreign land why should she be tried here?
She was told what would happen and chose to try to overthrow the West with her buddies... why should the West now pay for her?
It’s their job, so why should they not get paid? Doctors get paid too, as do nurses. When you’re being stitched up after an accident do you sit there thinking: “this leech is just doing it for the money!”?Right_winger wrote:What do you think a human rights lawyers MO is?
Upholding human rights or hoovering up cash?
Hint it’s the latter.
Stripping someone of their citizenship isn’t something the Home Secretary should be able to decide. It should be a judicial process in itself.elwaclaret wrote:If she is no longer a British subject, and is in a foreign land why should she be tried here?
She was told what would happen and chose to try to overthrow the West with her buddies... why should the West now pay for her?
Don't debate with fascists on human rights. They don't value other humans who aren't like them, and when they make arguments like "human rights lawyers get paid" they're only trying desperately to justify their hatred and inhumanity using PC language because if they gave their real reasons their real character would be exposed too clearly, and they wouldn't be welcome in society.AndrewJB wrote:It’s their job, so why should they not get paid? Doctors get paid too, as do nurses. When you’re being stitched up after an accident do you sit there thinking: “this leech is just doing it for the money!”?
Bleeding heart Liberals are largely responsible for us being in this mess. She’s forfeited her human rights by helping her compatriots kill lots of others, who also had human rights. If she wants to top herself let her, one less scrote in the world.Devils_Advocate wrote:We all benefit from the laws protecting our humans rights being adhered to and not ignored or broken when the circumstances are uncomfortable and extreme ones
If the aim is to just rid the world of scrotes one by one then join the queue. You're just a bitter old gobshite who has lost all relevance in the modern world. At least acting all sweary and aggressive on here seems to give you some hope to cling on to you sad old clownBennyD wrote:Bleeding heart Liberals are largely responsible for us being in this mess. She’s forfeited her human rights by helping her compatriots kill lots of others, who also had human rights. If she wants to top herself let her, one less scrote in the world.
BennyD wrote:Bleeding heart Liberals are largely responsible for us being in this mess. She’s forfeited her human rights by helping her compatriots kill lots of others, who also had human rights. If she wants to top herself let her, one less scrote in the world.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ean-ruling" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;AndrewJB wrote:Stripping someone of their citizenship isn’t something the Home Secretary should be able to decide. It should be a judicial process in itself.
He was born in Sudan.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ean-ruling
ECHR have already ruled on it.
Can I just check something, are you suggesting a public rape as punishment?Pstotto wrote:If not a hanging there, a public banging here... If 100,000 sign a petition it can be debated in parliament. #Help for Heroes
Yes he was, well done, but I was replying to someone who wanted a judicial process.Imploding Turtle wrote:He was born in Sudan.
That’s not what I said. Judicial process first. Stripping of citizenship second. Not a whim of the Home Secretary.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ean-ruling
ECHR have already ruled on it.
Yes, and i'd argue that he should be allowed a judicial process too. However those circumstances and facts are different to Begum's case.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Yes he was, well done, but I was replying to someone who wanted a judicial process.
Fascists??Imploding Turtle wrote:Don't debate with fascists on human rights. They don't value other humans who aren't like them, and when they make arguments like "human rights lawyers get paid" they're only trying desperately to justify their hatred and inhumanity using PC language because if they gave their real reasons their real character would be exposed too clearly, and they wouldn't be welcome in society.
I've recently (very recently) started using it as a catch-all for extrem right wingers like right-winger. If you have a problem with that then you can shove it up your arse, because i don't seem to see you have a problem with people throwing around "communists".elwaclaret wrote:Fascists??
Don’t show your ignorance. Fascism is a political doctrine not a groovy term for People who disagree with you. Muppet
Well, that is alright then, you feel free to bastardise as many words as you like to mean what you want. Makes perfect sense.Imploding Turtle wrote:I've recently (very recently) started using it as a catch-all for extrem right wingers like right-winger. If you have a problem with that then you can shove it up your arse, because i don't seem to see you have a problem with people throwing around "communists".
lol. So Communism is allowed to be a catch-all term, but nor Fascism? lol p*ss off.elwaclaret wrote:Well, that is alright then, you feel free to bastardise as many words as you like to mean what you want. Makes perfect sense.
Communist is hardly the same as Fascist .... it is a catch all for Marxism, Trotskyism, Maoism etc. But hey ho. You carry on making your own language rules.
willsclarets wrote:Based on a poll by ICM in 2016, they found that 23% of muslims supported Sharia Law 'in some areas of Britain'. Some other findings:
The research suggests that 86% of British Muslims feel a strong sense of belonging in Britain, which is higher than the national average of 83%. A large majority (91%) of the British Muslims who took part in the survey said they felt a strong sense of belonging in their local area, which is higher than the national average of 76%.Of those questioned, 88% said Britain was a good place for Muslims to live in, and 78% said they would like to integrate into British life on most things apart from Islamic schooling and some laws.
Anyway, the maths. According to my calculations, 23% of muslims represent less than 1% of the UK's whole population. How on earth would you suggest, even if all of them felt unbelievably strongly about the issue, that such a relatively small number would change our entire system of law?
No because fascism describes a theory... or are Marxism, Stalinism and Trotskyism all the same doctorine?Imploding Turtle wrote:lol. So Communism is allowed to be a catch-all term, but nor Fascism? lol p*ss off.
Just admit you're Islamophobic.Lowbankclaret wrote:Whilst it’s well hidden , you need to look for data on % of Muslim in the uk each year.
My 30-40 years may be shorted than it takes.
But the % increases each year.
elwaclaret wrote:No because fascism describes a theory... or are Marxism, Stalinism and Trotskyism all the same doctorine?
I’ll give you a clue, an ice pick to the winner.... they were both communists.
Do you realise you're parroting "The Great Replacement" conspiracy theory? That's where your idea comes from, were you aware of that?Lowbankclaret wrote:Whilst it’s well hidden , you need to look for data on % of Muslim in the uk each year.
My 30-40 years may be shorted than it takes.
But the % increases each year.
Another keyboard warrior spouts off. Perhaps you might think differently if it was one of your loved ones being slaughtered on U-tube. People like you can only see the unicorn populated utopia that you think the world can become, I have news for you pinko, it can’t. If people like that don’t turn you ‘sweary and aggressive’ then you are part of the problem.Devils_Advocate wrote:If the aim is to just rid the world of scrotes one by one then join the queue. You're just a bitter old gobshite who has lost all relevance in the modern world. At least acting all sweary and aggressive on here seems to give you some hope to cling on to you sad old clown
She'd soon get fed up of being called stupid and plead to go back to the camp.bfc-sparta wrote:Bring her back and move her in with turtle im sure he'd love to make her feel welcome.
Another good reason for Brexit. Cue strangled cries from snowflake remainers. FFS.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ean-ruling
ECHR have already ruled on it.