AndrewJB wrote:If you can’t see why people have concerns about the fact our government can declare you unwelcome to live here while you’re out of the country, and effectively banish you without judicial oversight, then perhaps you’d be more at home in North Korea?
https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/shamima-beg ... ned-104386" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - as it says on this link, the government added a new reason for stripping someone of citizenship in 2014. Behaviour “not conducive to the public good” is an easy catchall, that could allow my citizenship to be removed (for example). When you suggest this is improbable - I should point out the numbers have been rising year on year. Between 2006 and 2016 it was used 50 times. In 2017 it was used 104 times. We’ve seen this government’s attitude through the Windrush Scandal, so I can see this getting worse before it gets better.
So the trick is to not do something that could get your citizenship revoked.
The intelligence services have something on her, that's enough for the government to justify what it's done.
I'm pretty sure I won't be joining a religious terrorist organisation hell-bent on taking over the west etc.
Nor will my kids, family or friends.
If you're happy to have these terrorists back living in the country then go ahead and lobby your MP with reasons justifying your stance, but if they do return and then do something over here resulting in innocent people being hurt or killed don't start pointing the finger at the government for letting them back.
However again I'll point out she's in a foreign country as part of an illegal organisation that's been committing atrocities that have been well documented, broadcast to the world and she's not shown much, if any, remorse.
She literally wants to return to the UK because the caliphate has gone, if it was still there then so would she.
Let the countries she's been in deal with her in their courts, that's the fairest way to do it isn't it?