Or, more likely, serve a custodial sentence.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:38 pmWell she could be released under surveillance, nothing could possibly happen then.
Begum ‘risk of hanging’
-
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
-
- Posts: 10165
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4186 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
Yep, that will fix her
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
This is a genuine question as I am quite conflicted by this situation. What crime(s) has she actually committed either of an International or UK nature.
-
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
Where did I say it would?
-
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
Stop being silly this is cut & dry compared to visiting a GP where anything could be wrong with so many variables, this woman was meticulously assessed prior to stripping the citizenship & on the basis of the findings she was deemed a high security risk.
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
Well at least that is one thing you have got correct Andrew
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
You were implying that as she would be serving a custodial sentence she would not be under surveillance or a risk to the public. This was in response to the previous post but then you know that.
The recent attack in London was by a ‘time served’ terrorist who had apparently changed his ways after going on a course ( no doubt all funded by the taxpayer). That approach really worked well. Keep her out.
This user liked this post: Funkydrummer
-
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
Yes, I said that I expect she would serve a custodial sentence. My post was in response to the comment "yep, that'll fix her" (I did quote that post, it does make it easier to follow). I never claimed prison would fix her.Blackrod wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:30 pmYou were implying that as she would be serving a custodial sentence she would not be under surveillance or a risk to the public. This was in response to the previous post but then you know that.
The recent attack in London was by a ‘time served’ terrorist who had apparently changed his ways after going on a course ( no doubt all funded by the taxpayer). That approach really worked well. Keep her out.
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
How do you meticulously assess someone when they're not there? Here's a hint. You can't.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:49 pmStop being silly this is cut & dry compared to visiting a GP where anything could be wrong with so many variables, this woman was meticulously assessed prior to stripping the citizenship & on the basis of the findings she was deemed a high security risk.
What do you have to say about your fellow citizen (or he was until a few weeks ago) Fatush Lala?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 32311.html
There are things like this happening all the time, and people being thrown out of the country who have lived here most of their lives.
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
You are missing the point. Lala isn’t a terrorist but Begum is and/ or certainly supports terrorism. Not really a worthwhile link and looks like you are grasping for any element of infringed ‘rights’. Anyone would think you were a Human Rights lawyer trying to justify yourself. We should be celebrating we have taken a hard line flying some criminals out the country recently. Trying to fight the corner of someone who is a risk to the country is not going to win you much support. The public don’t want dangerous individuals here when they don’t belong here. People that do belong here need dealing with and punishing properly. If Begum’s family love their daughter so much they can b* gger off to Syria or Bangladesh to be with her. They want the benefits this country has to offer though.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
-
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
You just don't seem to be listening, THE WOMAN IS DANGEROUS, the powers that be, thankfully may I add, have considered & assessed everything what's gone on, from the point of her leaving the UK to this present point, do you not think when she first went the house wasn't raided & her computer & all the data that was there wasn't recovered about all the links to the terrorists organisations, the security services have categorised her as a high level risk based on all the information recovered & the overseas intel ops which is covert & highly sensitive.AndrewJB wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 6:42 pmHow do you meticulously assess someone when they're not there? Here's a hint. You can't.
What do you have to say about your fellow citizen (or he was until a few weeks ago) Fatush Lala?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 32311.html
There are things like this happening all the time, and people being thrown out of the country who have lived here most of their lives.
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
Can any of the closet racists on here answer this extremely valid question raised by Corky, and actually provide evidence. Ta
-
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1183 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
You could argue treason, with the UK part of the global coalition. I don't have to be a closet racist I just want the UK to be a peaceful place.
Re: Begum ‘risk of hanging’
I know in the Daily Mail world things like facts and evidence are just inconvenient obstacles, but given that Begum was a child when she went to Syria, it’s more likely that she was groomed online with promises of a better life, rather than supporting terrorism, but your mind might not be open enough for such a possibility.Blackrod wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 7:00 pmYou are missing the point. Lala isn’t a terrorist but Begum is and/ or certainly supports terrorism. Not really a worthwhile link and looks like you are grasping for any element of infringed ‘rights’. Anyone would think you were a Human Rights lawyer trying to justify yourself. We should be celebrating we have taken a hard line flying some criminals out the country recently. Trying to fight the corner of someone who is a risk to the country is not going to win you much support. The public don’t want dangerous individuals here when they don’t belong here. People that do belong here need dealing with and punishing properly. If Begum’s family love their daughter so much they can b* gger off to Syria or Bangladesh to be with her. They want the benefits this country has to offer though.
I suppose something to look forward to might be the last flight to repatriate bad people before the practice is curtailed, and watching erstwhile PM Johnson boarding it for his permanent move to the US.