RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
-
- Posts: 9293
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4831 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Michael Oliver (Newcastle) v Chelsea
How to Score
A. Decision Making (including use of advantage) - out of 25
B. Consistency - out of 25
C. Fitness and Positioning - of 25
D. Control and Authority - out of 25
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
13 - how he gave that penalty I will never know for a starter
15
15
16
15
15
16
-
- Posts: 3012
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 833 times
- Has Liked: 1630 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Can’t do from TV
But 4x23 for me thought he was excellent
Had to see the penalty on TV from different angles to see it was not a penalty
But 4x23 for me thought he was excellent
Had to see the penalty on TV from different angles to see it was not a penalty
-
- Posts: 67718
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32373 times
- Has Liked: 5270 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
A 20
B 20
C 23
D 21
B 20
C 23
D 21
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Not his worst game but seeing things that wasnt there ( guessing ) isnt good
14
19
19
19
14
19
19
19
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:25 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
A. 18
B. 20
C. 22
D. 21
B. 20
C. 22
D. 21
-
- Posts: 2525
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 878 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
A - 15
B - 15
C - 25
D - 20
B - 15
C - 25
D - 20
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
22
22
22
22
Didn’t get a lot wrong... the dive was a good one. And he booked him for it.
22
22
22
Didn’t get a lot wrong... the dive was a good one. And he booked him for it.
-
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2594 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
typical michael oliver performance, fairly solid, but gets the big decisions wrong. i called it as a dive straight away from the other end of the ground so how he couldn't tell from 10 yards away is mystifying.
actually, its not, its because he's a guesser. always has been and always will be.
actually, its not, its because he's a guesser. always has been and always will be.
This user liked this post: Bordeauxclaret
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
I think he has gone off as a ref. I was miles away from that "penalty" in the BL and it was a clear dive. Refs need to study how people go down when they trip or are tripped. It is amazing how in the penalty area they either defy gravity as they sail through the air or having been knocked sideways their trajectories are forwards. He made a similar daft award for Spurs two seasons ago when Ali went down in the first half. Rather than award pens these refs should be scoring for 1) artistic interpretation 2) difficulty of the dive
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
1. 20
2. 20
3. 20
4. 20
2. 20
3. 20
4. 20
-
- Posts: 67718
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32373 times
- Has Liked: 5270 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Is it a dive or has Lowton’s push in his back caused him to go down?quoonbeatz wrote:typical michael oliver performance, fairly solid, but gets the big decisions wrong. i called it as a dive straight away from the other end of the ground so how he couldn't tell from 10 yards away is mystifying.
actually, its not, its because he's a guesser. always has been and always will be.
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
It wasn’t a dive or a pen. He was nudged in the back and went down. Very slight but running at speed you can see the nudge... once VAR say no pen (quite rightly) he has to be booked. Ultimately this is another VAR or rule nonsense because you should be able to have a fall without it being a foul or a dive if you use common sense.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Hibsclaret wrote:It wasn’t a dive or a pen. He was nudged in the back and went down. Very slight but running at speed you can see the nudge... once VAR say no pen (quite rightly) he has to be booked. Ultimately this is another VAR or rule nonsense because you should be able to have a fall without it being a foul or a dive if you use common sense.
There is such a thing as uncertainty. Maybe not in your world, but in the world the rest of us inhabit there are situations where a decision is made based on uncertainty such as in deciding not to penalise someone. In this example it isn't clear if a foul was committed, therefore you don't punish either side. That's common sense, really.
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
So you’ve slagged me off whilst agreeing with what I said. Well done, I think.....Imploding Turtle wrote:There is such a thing as uncertainty. Maybe not in your world, but in the world the rest of us inhabit there are situations where a decision is made based on uncertainty such as in deciding not to penalise someone. In this example it isn't clear if a foul was committed, therefore you don't punish either side. That's common sense, really.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
So you're agreeing with him.Imploding Turtle wrote:There is such a thing as uncertainty. Maybe not in your world, but in the world the rest of us inhabit there are situations where a decision is made based on uncertainty such as in deciding not to penalise someone. In this example it isn't clear if a foul was committed, therefore you don't punish either side. That's common sense, really.
These 2 users liked this post: Hibsclaret cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Hibsclaret wrote:So you’ve slagged me off whilst agreeing with what I said. Well done, I think.....
You said he has to be booked. No he doesn't. Not if VAR decided no penalty based on uncertainty.
-
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2594 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
hudson-odoi lifts both his legs off the floor for no reason other than to pretend he's been fouled. its as clear a dive as you'll see.
the funny thing was he very nearly did it again later on but checked himself. thats the problem with players like him, his first instinct is to dive.
the real issue is why it isn't a straight red card. gives players a licence to cheat.
the funny thing was he very nearly did it again later on but checked himself. thats the problem with players like him, his first instinct is to dive.
the real issue is why it isn't a straight red card. gives players a licence to cheat.
These 3 users liked this post: IanMcL ElectroClaret mdd2
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Don’t think you have understood what I said as usual. I’m saying it was quite rightly no pen and so the VAR assessed what the ref thought was a trip as no contact so when the ref gets the info back about no contact he has to book odoi because it is confirmed as a dive. I don’t think the VAR believe there is enough contact from Lowton’s push or even if that was considered at all where the referral was for a non existent trip and not the push...the VAR should in my view look at the whole incident and suggest there is contact from Lowton but not enough for it to be an absolute dive...so no yellow...and certainly no pen...Imploding Turtle wrote:You said he has to be booked. No he doesn't. Not if VAR decided no penalty based on uncertainty.
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
He let us have advantage, when there was none, more than once.
If you are going to do that, call it back when the move disintegrates in a very short time.
If you are going to do that, call it back when the move disintegrates in a very short time.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
A few of us noticed. Was a jokequoonbeatz wrote:hudson-odoi lifts both his legs off the floor for no reason other than to pretend he's been fouled. its as clear a dive as you'll see.
the funny thing was he very nearly did it again later on but checked himself. thats the problem with players like him, his first instinct is to dive.
the real issue is why it isn't a straight red card. gives players a licence to cheat.
This user liked this post: quoonbeatz
-
- Posts: 17930
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1852 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
Nail on the head.quoonbeatz wrote:
the real issue is why it isn't a straight red card.
A straight red would stop it. Simple as.
This user liked this post: quoonbeatz
-
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 891 times
- Has Liked: 1100 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: RATE THE REF - Michael Oliver v Chelsea
A 21
B 23
C 23
D 21
B 23
C 23
D 21