Burnley fan v Burnley fan

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:43 pm

Leisure wrote:If everyone had to visit the Ticket Office to purchase tickets it could be possible to offer seats at the front for fans who want/need to sit. However, as the majority of tickets are probably sold online I'm not sure just how the system could facilitate this. Any suggestions? Also, whilst I'm aware of some games where the away fans are given the online facility to pick their seats from the home club's away section seating plan, I'm not aware of any club which offers fans the option of guaranteed sitting seats. Does anyone know of any? It's all well and good highlighting the standing/seating issue but probably easier said than done to resolve.
Unallocated seating. First come first served.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:44 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:So if you have a pedophile and a black man stood next to each other you think it is far worse for people to abuse the pedo for being a pedo then it is to abuse a black man for being black?
No but I think hes suggesting its worse to call a normal bloke a paedo than a black man a black man. Which of course it is

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12382
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5214 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:56 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:No but I think hes suggesting its worse to call a normal bloke a pedo than a black man a black man. Which of course it is
No thats completely different. Calling someone a pedo who isnt one is name calling albeit vile name calling. Abusing someone for who they actually are because of their skin colour is not name calling but is racism which is far worse.

Imagine there was a disabled lad in a wheelchair sat at the front and a group of Burnley fans abused him all game because of his disability whilst another grouped called Henderson a pedo. Would you honestly be more upset at the fans calling Henderson a pedo than you would the fans abusing a disabled lad for who he actually is

It is far worse to be a pedo than it is to be disabled or a black man because there is nothing wrong with being either disabled or black and that is the difference between name calling and real bigotry and prejudice

If you cant understand the difference then be thankful you have never had to grow up as part of a group who faces that kind of prejudice for just being different

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Nov 03, 2019 11:09 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:No thats completely different. Calling someone a pedo who isnt one is name calling albeit vile name calling. Abusing someone for who they actually are because of their skin colour is not name calling but is racism which is far worse.

Imagine there was a disabled lad in a wheelchair sat at the front and a group of Burnley fans abused him all game because of his disability whilst another grouped called Henderson a pedo. Would you honestly be more upset at the fans calling Henderson a pedo than you would the fans abusing a disabled lad for who he actually is

It is far worse to be a pedo than it is to be disabled or a black man because there is nothing wrong with being either disabled or black and that is the difference between name calling and real bigotry and prejudice

If you cant understand the difference then be thankful you have never had to grow up as part of a group who faces that kind of prejudice for just being different
I understand the point you are making.

I suppose context is relevant.

All are disgusting. Two wrongs and all that.
This user liked this post: Devils_Advocate

Leisure
Posts: 18644
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3815 times
Has Liked: 12505 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by Leisure » Sun Nov 03, 2019 11:21 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Unallocated seating. First come first served.
James - The slight flaw in that idea is if then people who want to stand go to the front then we're back to square one! :D

Bop
Posts: 836
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:48 pm
Been Liked: 244 times
Has Liked: 343 times
Location: Sandbach

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by Bop » Sun Nov 03, 2019 11:38 pm

Ohhh for the days of The Longside.....

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by tim_noone » Sun Nov 03, 2019 11:42 pm

Bop wrote:Ohhh for the days of The Longside.....
Nah....cricketfield terrace!

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Nov 03, 2019 11:45 pm

Leisure wrote:James - The slight flaw in that idea is if then people who want to stand go to the front then we're back to square one! :D
Get there earlier.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Leisure
Posts: 18644
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3815 times
Has Liked: 12505 times

Re: Burnley fan v Burnley fan

Post by Leisure » Sun Nov 03, 2019 11:55 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Get there earlier.
Yes, people who want to sit could do but it's not really a foolproof idea!

Post Reply