But how much better would things be having Brentford’s scouting network and being a mid table championship club?Jakubs Tash wrote:I think you're being a bit extreme. Brentford's scouting network has been quite good for them, yes. But they are still a mid table Championship team. If they were unearthing all of these amazing players they should really be ripping it up. They're not.
Hey, but if it fits with your narrative then crack on.....
Realistic transfer targets in January
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
It's early days yet but rumours are already starting which is to be expected.
Much will depend on how we perform over the next four games and those in December.
Not too mention any potential injuries.
If we do badly and are close or in the bottom three then even if injury free
there will be pressure on Dyche to get a few players in.
And they will have to be the type/s of player who can make a reasonably quick impact
on the pitch and therefore be in the starting 11 to do so.
If we do reasonably well before January and have 20+ points on the board (and are relatively injury free)
then some of the pressure will be off. But even then it would be wise to get one or two in.
Whatever we do and whomever we bring in there will inevitably be some, if not considerable risk involved.
But we can't afford to spend say 20m+ on a couple of players (Gibson and Vydra current examples)
to see them on the bench most of the time.
Much will depend on how we perform over the next four games and those in December.
Not too mention any potential injuries.
If we do badly and are close or in the bottom three then even if injury free
there will be pressure on Dyche to get a few players in.
And they will have to be the type/s of player who can make a reasonably quick impact
on the pitch and therefore be in the starting 11 to do so.
If we do reasonably well before January and have 20+ points on the board (and are relatively injury free)
then some of the pressure will be off. But even then it would be wise to get one or two in.
Whatever we do and whomever we bring in there will inevitably be some, if not considerable risk involved.
But we can't afford to spend say 20m+ on a couple of players (Gibson and Vydra current examples)
to see them on the bench most of the time.
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
If it's an either or, then it will be sign no one then, as I don't think we will spend big bucks and a player walk into the team.jurek wrote: But we can't afford to spend say 20m+ on a couple of players (Gibson and Vydra current examples)
to see them on the bench most of the time.
We regularly stress how difficult and inflated the January window is.
Maybe we are best served ( if we are safe ) to be the seller. Getting shut of Vydra and Gibson may see 20m coming in, and if we can get in a player short term loan/contract to see us through, could leave us in a better position come the summer to splash the cash on 2 or 3 top quality, 1st team ready players.
The last 2, 3 maybe even 4 windows have been very poor to average at best, I don't think we can afford 2 more similar to the last few.
I think both the gaffer and chairman also realise this.
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Jakubs Tash wrote:I think you're being a bit extreme. Brentford's scouting network has been quite good for them, yes. But they are still a mid table Championship team. If they were unearthing all of these amazing players they should really be ripping it up. They're not.
Hey, but if it fits with your narrative then crack on.....
The problem is they have to sell each year but if they could keep them all together you never know - but hey you crack on
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 286 times
- Has Liked: 427 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Why do they have to sell each year ?BOYSIE31 wrote:The problem is they have to sell each year but if they could keep them all together you never know - but hey you crack on
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Hapag Lloyd wrote:Why do they have to sell each year ?
Because they are a selling club with gates of about 8000
-
- Posts: 19395
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
They have enormous debt as well, north of £60m - at last posted resulsHapag Lloyd wrote:Why do they have to sell each year ?
http://financialfootballnews.com/brentf ... -finances/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: Hapag Lloyd
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 286 times
- Has Liked: 427 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
So they have financial restraints just as we do.
In Premier league terms we are a small club unable to compete financially with the majority of the rest of the league so we have to cut our cloth accordingly, as Brentford do in the Championship.
In Premier league terms we are a small club unable to compete financially with the majority of the rest of the league so we have to cut our cloth accordingly, as Brentford do in the Championship.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 546 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Jarrod Bowen
Ollie Watkins
Eberechi Eze
Kalvin Phillips (although cant see Leeds selling unless the fee is massive)
Perhaps the young right back we were in for last time around can’t remember his name but we need an upgrade sharpish in that position
Ollie Watkins
Eberechi Eze
Kalvin Phillips (although cant see Leeds selling unless the fee is massive)
Perhaps the young right back we were in for last time around can’t remember his name but we need an upgrade sharpish in that position
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Hapag Lloyd wrote:So they have financial restraints just as we do.
In Premier league terms we are a small club unable to compete financially with the majority of the rest of the league so we have to cut our cloth accordingly, as Brentford do in the Championship.
Only about 100 million difference but yes i see your point
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
BOYSIE31 wrote:Only about 100 million difference but yes i see your point
So you would agree we get it more right than they do then ?
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
claretonthecoast1882 wrote:So you would agree we get it more right than they do then ?
For scouting ??? No
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
BOYSIE31 wrote:For scouting ??? No
-
- Posts: 19395
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Hapag Lloyd wrote:So they have financial restraints just as we do.
In Premier league terms we are a small club unable to compete financially with the majority of the rest of the league so we have to cut our cloth accordingly, as Brentford do in the Championship.
No they are not the same as us - the owner has financed losses that have seen that debt grow (and not just on the new ground), even with all those player sales (they can afford to get it wrong and as a consequence, take more risks) - we do not finance (countenance) debt - many see the sales and think they are doing something right, some see that they cannot break even or challenge for promotion as they do not get enough decisions right (or buy too raw) - take your pick
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Does anyone think we could manage signing Eric Dier if he continues to be out of favor at Tottenham? His wages should be a lot lower than Drinkwater and his contact is up 2021.
-
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 134 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
the clue is in the title REALISTIC. jesus weptsuperdimitri wrote:Does anyone think we could manage signing Eric Dier if he continues to be out of favor at Tottenham? His wages should be a lot lower than Drinkwater and his contact is up 2021.
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
So it's not realistic for us to sign Dier on loan like we did with Drinkwater, when he's on almost half his weekly wages. Yeah Jesus really did weep. Thanks for the kind and informative reply.pushpinpussy wrote:the clue is in the title REALISTIC. jesus wept
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Dier is quite simply dire this seasonsuperdimitri wrote:Does anyone think we could manage signing Eric Dier if he continues to be out of favor at Tottenham? His wages should be a lot lower than Drinkwater and his contact is up 2021.
Poch stopped playing him and he looked way off the pace at West Ham on Sat (don't know if he played last night)
Jose tried to sign him when at Utd, so don't see him going anywhere (Wanyama more likely to be made available, or the young lad Skipp)
-
- Posts: 16745
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3770 times
- Has Liked: 7569 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
Didn't think they still wrapped fish & chips up in newspapers!BaronGarcia wrote:From the Sun today .... I give up with today’s amazing journalism .....
“Burnley are heading the queue for Preston midfielder Ben Pearson with both Steven Defour and Jeff Hendrick out of contract at the end of the season.”
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Realistic transfer targets in January
He's out of favor with other players knocking on the door. If his form doesn't return I don't think Mourinho will keep him. It's basically make or break for him at the moment.jojomk1 wrote:Dier is quite simply dire this season
Poch stopped playing him and he looked way off the pace at West Ham on Sat (don't know if he played last night)
Jose tried to sign him when at Utd, so don't see him going anywhere (Wanyama more likely to be made available, or the young lad Skipp)
Anyway, it was just a thought after I saw he was subbed off in their last game in favor of more attacking options.