Pope is 1234

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Pope is 1234

Post by wilks_bfc » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:16 pm

England are now allocating legacy numbers for debut appearances

Turns out Pope was the 1234th player to make his debut


Oh and he’s also in the squad for next set of games :)
Attachments
C13FA9EB-7BD5-4FFB-9EDA-B1FE8AAAB59D.jpeg
C13FA9EB-7BD5-4FFB-9EDA-B1FE8AAAB59D.jpeg (161.88 KiB) Viewed 3668 times

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:21 pm

Just a few notable others :-
John Angus 796
Tommy Boyle 363
Ralph Coates 864
Martin Dobson 893
Bob Kelly 396
Brian Miller 797
Ray Pointer 799.
This user liked this post: turfytopper

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:31 pm

I think Jack Yates was our earliest, 165, he played one game against Ireland in 1899 and scored a hat-trick.
The most infamous was Jack Hillman, 242, who was banned for the whole of the 1900/01 season for trying to bribe Notts Forest players in the last game of the previous season to enable Burnley to avoid relegation.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:31 pm

Pope Gregory IX was Pope in 1234...

Apparently Gregory IX promulgated the Decretals in 1234, a code of canon law that remained the fundamental source of ecclesiastical law for the Catholic Church until after World War I.

Edukashunal coming in ere innit :D
These 6 users liked this post: Suratclaret Buxtonclaret AndrewJB Juan Tanamera dougcollins IanMcL

Sproggy
Posts: 1460
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:41 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Sproggy » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:49 pm

"England's Number 1234, England, England's Number 1234...."
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat cricketfieldclarets turfytopper MT03ALG

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by houseboy » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:22 pm

Bosscat wrote:Pope Gregory IX was Pope in 1234...

Apparently Gregory IX promulgated the Decretals in 1234, a code of canon law that remained the fundamental source of ecclesiastical law for the Catholic Church until after World War I.

Edukashunal coming in ere innit :D
Well mate I was thinking of trying to make some sort of joke about the Pope but you beat me to it with a serious piece of info. The problem lies in you uncovering yet another conspiracy. Pope? 1234? This cannot be a coincidence! Marrying up two things like that will have the wrath of the entire Catholic church rain down on you from high. It seems they have been waiting for the right moment to unleash the second coming and that was to have been shortly after Pope 1234 appeared. Now you have exploded their plot. Move house quickly Boss and change your name - it's the only thing that will save you. Killer monks are unstoppable.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:27 pm

houseboy wrote:Well mate I was thinking of trying to make some sort of joke about the Pope but you beat me to it with a serious piece of info. The problem lies in you uncovering yet another conspiracy. Pope? 1234? This cannot be a coincidence! Marrying up two things like that will have the wrath of the entire Catholic church rain down on you from high. It seems they have been waiting for the right moment to unleash the second coming and that was to have been shortly after Pope 1234 appeared. Now you have exploded their plot. Move house quickly Boss and change your name - it's the only thing that will save you. Killer monks are unstoppable.
Am now awaiting Michael Palin, Terry Gilliam and Graham Chapman to burst through the door....

NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, and surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.... oh bugger I'll come in again :D :D .
These 2 users liked this post: Buxtonclaret IanMcL

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10899
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5553 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by TheFamilyCat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:32 pm

There'll be some terrible players amongst those 1244. Carlton Palmer springs instantly to mind.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:42 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:There'll be some terrible players amongst those 1244. Carlton Palmer springs instantly to mind.
His uncle Arnold was a great Golfer though :)

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by houseboy » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:42 pm

Bosscat wrote:Am now awaiting Michael Palin, Terry Gilliam and Graham Chapman to burst through the door....

NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, and surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.... oh bugger I'll come in again :D :D .
Love it mate, love it. That's almost as good as the argument between the Judean People's Front and the People's Front of Judea.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:47 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:England are now allocating legacy numbers for debut appearances

Turns out Pope was the 1234th player to make his debut


Oh and he’s also in the squad for next set of games :)
What happens if maddison and tomori both start on the next game?

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8467
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2461 times
Has Liked: 1991 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Tricky Trevor » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:01 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:There'll be some terrible players amongst those 1244. Carlton Palmer springs instantly to mind.
And Brian Greenhof. Proves how desperate we were in those sad times.

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:06 pm

A couple of notable others are Jay Rod (1200) and Danny Ings (1211), although both of them won their International caps after leaving Burnley. I think we had 28 players honoured for England WHILST playing for Burnley but I'm quite happy to be corrected on that figure.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:11 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:A couple of notable others are Jay Rod (1200) and Danny Ings (1211), although both of them won their International caps after leaving Burnley. I think we had 28 players honoured for England WHILST playing for Burnley but I'm quite happy to be corrected on that figure.
Don't forget the lad that scored for England in Russia m8 Keiran Trippier 1222 now plying his trade in Spain
Last edited by Bosscat on Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30626
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5645 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:13 pm

Not sure how Stones gets in the squad

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:14 pm

Bosscat wrote:Don't forget the lad that scored for England in Russia m8 Keiran Trippier now plying his trade in Soain
Tripps was at Tottenham when he won his first cap.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:20 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:Tripps was at Tottenham when he won his first cap.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Yes obvs .....

90% (exageration) of the players mentioned in this thread don't currently play for Burnley and quite a few never have or will :D

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by wilks_bfc » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:26 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:What happens if maddison and tomori both start on the next game?

Then Pope will still be number 1234

(not sure if missing an obvious joke here :? )

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:30 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:Then Pope will still be number 1234

(not sure if missing an obvious joke here :? )
I guess he means which of the two will be 1245 and which 1246.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:44 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:What happens if maddison and tomori both start on the next game?
Pretty certain it will be alphabetical so Maddison on 1245 and Tomori 1246.

There has been a precedent and remarkably it involved two Burnley players. In the England game against Austria in 1961 both John Angus and Brian Miller made their England debuts, Angus has been allocated 796 and Miller 797.
These 3 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets AndrewJB MT03ALG

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8356
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 2973 times
Has Liked: 2072 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Funkydrummer » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:53 pm

That's one helluva game of bingo going on there.

Surprisingly, this has not yet been asked, who's No 1 ?

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:56 pm

Funkydrummer wrote:That's one helluva game of bingo going on there.

Surprisingly, this has not yet been asked, who's No 1 ?
Robert Barker.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:57 pm

Funkydrummer wrote:That's one helluva game of bingo going on there.

Surprisingly, this has not yet been asked, who's No 1 ?
Everyone should know that m8....

Legacy Numbers

Robert Barker, England’s goalkeeper in football’s first international match in 1872, at number 1 to recent debutant Tyrone Mings at number 1244
This user liked this post: Funkydrummer

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8356
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 2973 times
Has Liked: 2072 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Funkydrummer » Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:57 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:Robert Barker.

??????????? :o :shock:

EDIT Thanks for the info, couldn't be ar$ed looking it up. :D
This user liked this post: Bosscat

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by wilks_bfc » Thu Nov 07, 2019 5:33 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:I guess he means which of the two will be 1245 and which 1246.
Ahhh that makes sense :lol:

I’m assuming alphabetical order

Claretmatt4
Posts: 3946
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 1049 times
Has Liked: 723 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Claretmatt4 » Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:28 pm

houseboy wrote:Well mate I was thinking of trying to make some sort of joke about the Pope but you beat me to it with a serious piece of info. The problem lies in you uncovering yet another conspiracy. Pope? 1234? This cannot be a coincidence! Marrying up two things like that will have the wrath of the entire Catholic church rain down on you from high. It seems they have been waiting for the right moment to unleash the second coming and that was to have been shortly after Pope 1234 appeared. Now you have exploded their plot. Move house quickly Boss and change your name - it's the only thing that will save you. Killer monks are unstoppable.
Houseboy again making stuff up. None of this is actually true.

Helmshore Claret
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:16 am
Been Liked: 32 times
Has Liked: 78 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Helmshore Claret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 8:35 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:I think Jack Yates was our earliest, 165, he played one game against Ireland in 1899 and scored a hat-trick.
The most infamous was Jack Hillman, 242, who was banned for the whole of the 1900/01 season for trying to bribe Notts Forest players in the last game of the previous season to enable Burnley to avoid relegation.
According to the Burnley records he failed,as we lost 4-0; but, at least,he tried!

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Thu Nov 07, 2019 8:36 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:Pretty certain it will be alphabetical so Maddison on 1245 and Tomori 1246.

There has been a precedent and remarkably it involved two Burnley players. In the England game against Austria in 1961 both John Angus and Brian Miller made their England debuts, Angus has been allocated 796 and Miller 797.
Theres the answer. Thanks as ever rbc

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 8:52 pm

Helmshore Claret wrote:According to the Burnley records he failed,as we lost 4-0; but, at least,he tried!
All the reports suggest he did try, Helmshore. But he paid with one hell of a price, a full season ban in 1900/01.

As you rightly say he failed and we suffered relegation as a consequence. It was not until the 1913/14 season that we resumed our place in Division One and by that time Hillman was long gone.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Bosscat » Thu Nov 07, 2019 9:10 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Claretmatt4 wrote:Houseboy again making stuff up. None of this is actually true.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

You don't say.... House was making it up.... so I can unbolt the doors and cancel the Witness protection programme...
Thank f**k for that I was getting worried....

Ffs m8 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 9:33 pm

Have to say the one thing the FA have highlighted to me in this legacy numbers exercise is the yawning gap between Martin Dobson (893) in 1974 and Tom Heaton (1216) in 2016..........Was there really a gap of 42 years during which no Burnley player made his debut for England ?

In the previous 75 years from 1899 to 1974 we had, I think, 24 players representing England and of course we've had three since 2016, Nick, Jack & Tarks.

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4439
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1161 times
Has Liked: 1293 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:02 pm

Who is number 1?

I am not a number I am a free man!

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:08 pm

Cirrus_Minor wrote:Who is number 1?

I am not a number I am a free man!
It's Robert Barker, way back in 1872.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:12 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:A couple of notable others are Jay Rod (1200) and Danny Ings (1211), although both of them won their International caps after leaving Burnley. I think we had 28 players honoured for England WHILST playing for Burnley but I'm quite happy to be corrected on that figure.
I’ll correct you - it’s 29

Jack Yates
James Crabtree
Jack Hillman
William Bannister
Bert Freeman
Tommy Boyle
Willie Watson
Eddie Mosscrop
Bob Kelly
Jerry Dawson
Jack Hill
Jack Bruton
Louis Page
George Waterfield
Billy Elliott
Brian Pilkington
Colin McDonald
John Connelly
John Angus
Brian Miller
Ray Pointer
Gordon Harris
Ralph Coates
Martin Dobson
Tom Heaton
Michael Keane
Jack Cork
James Tarkowski
Nick Pope
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:18 pm

Cheers for that CT. I missed Michael Keane for some reason.

AndrewJB
Posts: 3808
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:20 pm
Been Liked: 1159 times
Has Liked: 754 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by AndrewJB » Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:20 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:Have to say the one thing the FA have highlighted to me in this legacy numbers exercise is the yawning gap between Martin Dobson (893) in 1974 and Tom Heaton (1216) in 2016..........Was there really a gap of 42 years during which no Burnley player made his debut for England ?

In the previous 75 years from 1899 to 1974 we had, I think, 24 players representing England and of course we've had three since 2016, Nick, Jack & Tarks.
We had Trevor Steven - but he wasn't playing for us by then. Lee Dixon the same. Ian Wright and Gascoigne went the other direction. There may be more that I haven't recalled.

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3880
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1280 times
Has Liked: 681 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Royboyclaret » Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:28 pm

AndrewJB wrote:We had Trevor Steven - but he wasn't playing for us by then. Lee Dixon the same. Ian Wright and Gascoigne went the other direction. There may be more that I haven't recalled.
Andrew....... Mike Phelan, Dave Thomas and Tony Morley also come into that category, but none of them played for England WHILST they were at Burnley.
This user liked this post: AndrewJB

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Nov 07, 2019 11:39 pm

AndrewJB wrote:We had Trevor Steven - but he wasn't playing for us by then. Lee Dixon the same. Ian Wright and Gascoigne went the other direction. There may be more that I haven't recalled.
These are post war players who have played for Burnley and England but won caps before or after they played for us.

Before

Joey Barton
Andy Cole
Gordon Cowans
Paul Gascoigne
Keith Newton
David Nugent
Nick Pickering
Kevin Reeves
Michael Ricketts
Paul Stewart
Mike Summerbee
Dennis Tueart
David Unsworth
Tony Waiters
Chris Waddle
Chris Woods
Ian Wright

After

Gary Cahill
Nathaniel Chalobah
Lee Dixon
Danny Ings
Micky Phelan
Trevor Steven
Dave Thomas
Kieran Trippier

Both

Tony Morley
Jay Rodriguez
These 2 users liked this post: AndrewJB Bosscat

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by houseboy » Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:16 am

Claretmatt4 wrote:Houseboy again making stuff up. None of this is actually true.
Heaven for-fend that I should do such a thing. :o :o :o

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Bosscat » Fri Nov 08, 2019 10:26 am

houseboy wrote:Heaven for-fend that I should do such a thing. :o :o :o
Not going to talk or reply to you again house .... apparently one person thinks you, Steve1956 and I are the same person :lol: :lol: :lol:

Apparently he thinks we are one account and probably the reason the "His Dark Materials' thread has been removed by the Moderators.....

I know we have the same sense of humour m8 but thats effin ridiculous...

I called the accuser a loony and a tit ... I reckon he got a tad upset at that, but he was asking me to explain why I wouldn't give him proof of "banned books" and quoting your posts :lol:

Several tried to explain I wasn't you or Steve but the clown wasn't having it...

Even included the picture of Steve and I meeting at the Everton match in the Fanzone ......

Comedy gold m8 worthy of a Python sketch in its own right ;)

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by houseboy » Fri Nov 08, 2019 12:21 pm

Bosscat wrote:Not going to talk or reply to you again house .... apparently one person thinks you, Steve1956 and I are the same person :lol: :lol: :lol:

Apparently he thinks we are one account and probably the reason the "His Dark Materials' thread has been removed by the Moderators.....

I know we have the same sense of humour m8 but thats effin ridiculous...

I called the accuser a loony and a tit ... I reckon he got a tad upset at that, but he was asking me to explain why I wouldn't give him proof of "banned books" and quoting your posts :lol:

Several tried to explain I wasn't you or Steve but the clown wasn't having it...

Even included the picture of Steve and I meeting at the Everton match in the Fanzone ......

Comedy gold m8 worthy of a Python sketch in its own right ;)
Are you pulling my cord bud? For a start I didn't even know the Dark Materials thread had been axed - why was that anyway? And as we all know bud we can't be the same because I am far better looking than you. ;) And I couldn't pick a lock if my life depended on it.
For the benefit of said loony I'll endeavor to explain.The only relationship between me and Steve is that we were mates about 40-odd years ago and we used to go the Turf with a gang of us back in the days of flairs and loons.We haven't been in the same room for over 40 years and the only reason we found out who we both were on here is because Steve guessed it from some references I made and from my username (which reflects my rather unusual surname). You and I Boss have never (to the best of my knowledge) met but know each other from the Lancashire Telegraph Burnley forum, where I was known as Houseclaret, a name I couldn't use on here because it was 'taken'.

The fact that we have the same sense of humour and have the same or similar tastes in music has probably more to do with being a similar age than being joined at the hip.

So I hope that clears it up. To the gentleman who has paranoia may I suggest a good psychiatrist.

Now I'll just go on to my other accounts and make similar denials. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Herts Clarets
Posts: 3951
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
Been Liked: 1766 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Herts Clarets » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:08 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:There'll be some terrible players amongst those 1244. Carlton Palmer springs instantly to mind.
I'll see your Carlton Palmer and raise you a Nick Pickering......
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Bosscat » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:42 pm

houseboy wrote:Are you pulling my cord bud? For a start I didn't even know the Dark Materials thread had been axed - why was that anyway? And as we all know bud we can't be the same because I am far better looking than you. ;) And I couldn't pick a lock if my life depended on it.
For the benefit of said loony I'll endeavor to explain.The only relationship between me and Steve is that we were mates about 40-odd years ago and we used to go the Turf with a gang of us back in the days of flairs and loons.We haven't been in the same room for over 40 years and the only reason we found out who we both were on here is because Steve guessed it from some references I made and from my username (which reflects my rather unusual surname). You and I Boss have never (to the best of my knowledge) met but know each other from the Lancashire Telegraph Burnley forum, where I was known as Houseclaret, a name I couldn't use on here because it was 'taken'.

The fact that we have the same sense of humour and have the same or similar tastes in music has probably more to do with being a similar age than being joined at the hip.

So I hope that clears it up. To the gentleman who has paranoia may I suggest a good psychiatrist.

Now I'll just go on to my other accounts and make similar denials. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think it got pulled because said loony complained that I called him a loony and a tit for trying to get me to prove comments I hadn't made ... so he tried to say you me and Steve are the same account :lol:

I reckon he reported me for tearing into him for denying I was you and Steve :lol:

There is no accounting for some folks ....

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by houseboy » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:52 pm

Bosscat wrote:I think it got pulled because said loony complained that I called him a loony and a tit for trying to get me to prove comments I hadn't made ... so he tried to say you me and Steve are the same account :lol:

I reckon he reported me for tearing into him for denying I was you and Steve :lol:

There is no accounting for some folks ....
I wish I was you Boss, you're retired and have far more money than me (but at least I have the looks). :lol: :lol:

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope in 1234

Post by Bosscat » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:01 pm

houseboy wrote:I wish I was you Boss, you're retired and have far more money than me (but at least I have the looks). :lol: :lol:
Yeah m8 we know .... they do say if you keep saying it m8 it must come true ;)

I love being me :D thankfully the wife agrees with me too ;)
This user liked this post: houseboy

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2542
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 608 times
Has Liked: 310 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Winstonswhite » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:10 pm

Jon Flanagan is another who unbelievably was capped before he joined us. I’ve a feeling it will be his only one.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:16 pm

Winstonswhite wrote:Jon Flanagan is another who unbelievably was capped before he joined us. I’ve a feeling it will be his only one.
He has - I'd missed him off the list above

groove
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:26 pm
Been Liked: 320 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by groove » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:18 pm

Legacy numbers? What a load of pointless crap. If it had been going on for over a hundred years fair enough. But to just posthumously give everyone a pointless number just seems a complete waste of time.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by Bosscat » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:33 pm

groove wrote:Legacy numbers? What a load of pointless crap. If it had been going on for over a hundred years fair enough. But to just posthumously give everyone a pointless number just seems a complete waste of time.
Cricket has been doing it for years ... nowt wrong with it and not only that, it gives bored people something to chat about on internet forums..... :D

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10899
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5553 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Pope is 1234

Post by TheFamilyCat » Fri Nov 08, 2019 4:21 pm

Herts Clarets wrote:I'll see your Carlton Palmer and raise you a Nick Pickering......
World's worst game of Top Trumps?

Stewart Ripley!

Post Reply