Defending for Son's goal
-
- Posts: 30629
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11035 times
- Has Liked: 5648 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Defending for Son's goal
just have a look at the replay around 55 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COIGsRMo-lY
No excuse to be that poor, particularly disappointed with Hendrick's lack of effort but they were all dreadful - that goal is very poor one for us
No excuse to be that poor, particularly disappointed with Hendrick's lack of effort but they were all dreadful - that goal is very poor one for us
-
- Posts: 12366
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5209 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
I thought Lowtons half arsed challenge was the pick of the bunch for that goal but the way Son ran through our team took me back to the early days of Kick Off and Sensible Soccer
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
What defending?
-
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 151 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Mate, stick it in the match thread. Starting a new thread for every minor incident is why this place is in such a mess. I despair with some internet warriors sometimes.
-
- Posts: 30629
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11035 times
- Has Liked: 5648 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Defending for Son's goal
mate, stick to your own board - you calling someone a warrior is the most pot kettle black thing I've read on hereMillertime v1.7 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:02 amMate, stick it in the match thread. Starting a new thread for every minor incident is why this place is in such a mess. I despair with some internet warriors sometimes.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 535 times
- Has Liked: 186 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: Defending for Son's goal
TBF to Lowton he was already on a yellow. It's Pieters or McMeil who should have taken one for the team.
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Don't think I dare watch it again. It looked bad enough live.
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Get use to watching it,it'll probably be shown for sometime to come and could well end up being goal of the season.
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Hope it's not going to become like that Eddie Gray goal against us they always show.
This user liked this post: Buxtonclaret
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
If you watch it back it is certainly McNeil who should have taken one for the team on this goal. McNeil needs to improve on his defending decisions in these sort of situations. Beyond that he was our best player by far though.
-
- Posts: 16728
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3766 times
- Has Liked: 7557 times
- Location: Derbyshire
-
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2004 times
- Has Liked: 3339 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Lowton had already had a yellow and was the one player who couldn't foul him for that reason, but the others, probably chiefly Pieters, had plenty of chance. It was actually OUR free kick FF!! When he scored I almost burst out laughing!! It was THAT embarrassing!
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:05 am
- Been Liked: 25 times
- Has Liked: 17 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
No doubt that Jeff Hendrick 'jogging' back almost put Son off....
-
- Posts: 8467
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2461 times
- Has Liked: 1992 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Not just that goal but we backed off into our penalty area every time they ran at us. At some point you have to front them up and make them make a decision. Terrible defending all day.
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
apart from being applauded for being able to run from his area to ours, he only went past 2 of our players, the rest were just caught in his slipstream as he sauntered along without a care in the world.
and yes, its spurs, therefore it will be shown endlessly .
and yes, its spurs, therefore it will be shown endlessly .
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Tarks should have stopped him in their box. Incidentally what was tarks actually doing there.
Kanes goal was no better defending tbh.
Kanes goal was no better defending tbh.
Re: Defending for Son's goal
It was clear from the big screen replays that Hendrick did not do enough and should have got in a position to take Son out or get a challenge in, a few others Lowton excepted could also have taken one for the team.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Defending for Son's goal
This goal shows how much we need a defensive midfielder to protect the backline,there's no way Son should be allowed to run 70 yards without a challenge/tactical foul being made,naivety at best and lack of effort at worst.summed up the 90 minutes,we threw the towel in after 10 minutes,that's unacceptable at any level.
-
- Posts: 12366
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5209 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Seen it back and it was McNeil not Lowton who made the pathetic attempt of a tackle I was on about so he now wins 1st prize for meDevils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:46 amI thought Lowtons half arsed challenge was the pick of the bunch for that goal but the way Son ran through our team took me back to the early days of Kick Off and Sensible Soccer
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:16 am
- Been Liked: 32 times
- Has Liked: 78 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
On Friday, I asked for:
A decent performance for the travelling fans (didn't get it)
No yellow cards to 'key players'.
No injuries.
We all knew that we were likely to get a good hiding, so no shocks there. Perhaps Dyche told them "And remember lads don't start taking 'one for the team' " if so I would back him.
A decent performance for the travelling fans (didn't get it)
No yellow cards to 'key players'.
No injuries.
We all knew that we were likely to get a good hiding, so no shocks there. Perhaps Dyche told them "And remember lads don't start taking 'one for the team' " if so I would back him.
Re: Defending for Son's goal
It gets worse the more times you watch it. Beyond amateur.
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
If you’d have been at the stadium you’d have seen it on the big screens and come to that conclusion much earlier, perhaps even yesterday as most of us did.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:43 amSeen it back and it was McNeil not Lowton who made the pathetic attempt of a tackle I was on about so he now wins 1st prize for me
Tbh McNeil is largely to blame for not fouling Son for the 3rd and for poor control on the first.
He was brilliant after that though
-
- Posts: 17249
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6488 times
- Has Liked: 2911 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Defending for Son's goal
The stream I watched the commentators were screaming goal of the season,I'm 63 and I could have run from one end of the pitch tut tuther and scored that unchallenged ,goal of the season ...what a load of boll0cks
These 2 users liked this post: Dark Cloud tim_noone
-
- Posts: 7385
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2236 times
- Has Liked: 2142 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Pieters had the opportunity to go through him and he pulled out - total bitch move in my opinion
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
-
- Posts: 12366
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5209 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Had better things to do yesterday thanks. Hope VAR isnt getting you too down fella it really isnt worth all your angstHibsclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:02 pmIf you’d have been at the stadium you’d have seen it on the big screens and come to that conclusion much earlier, perhaps even yesterday as most of us did.
Tbh McNeil is largely to blame for not fouling Son for the 3rd and for poor control on the first.
He was brilliant after that though
-
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2004 times
- Has Liked: 3339 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Tarks was in their box for OUR free kick and it actually wasn't that bad a free kick tbh and went pretty much straight to him, but he failed to gather it and control it and the rest is (allegedly ) goal of the f'ing season!!cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:24 amTarks should have stopped him in their box. Incidentally what was tarks actually doing there.
Kanes goal was no better defending tbh.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Defending for Son's goal
I would lock them all up in a room tomorrow and put this goal on a tv on repeat for 2 hours
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 6705
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1818 times
- Has Liked: 1796 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Defending for Son's goal
As much as I like Son, he's not Maradona.
Though we made him look like it.
Though we made him look like it.
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Still had time to suggest I hadn’t been though....Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:13 pmHad better things to do yesterday thanks. Hope VAR isnt getting you too down fella it really isnt worth all your angst
-
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:30 pm
- Been Liked: 78 times
- Has Liked: 93 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Tarks had his shirt pulled at the free kick and lost valuable time rightly complaining to the ref. Whether it made any difference is anyone’s guess.Dark Cloud wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:54 pmTarks was in their box for OUR free kick and it actually wasn't that bad a free kick tbh and went pretty much straight to him, but he failed to gather it and control it and the rest is (allegedly ) goal of the f'ing season!!
-
- Posts: 6902
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Pathetic "defending '
-
- Posts: 15236
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3156 times
- Has Liked: 6744 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
When a player camn dribble faster than any of our players can run 50 metres there's something very wrong.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Defending for Son's goal
A recruitment drive that means players signed going forwards, have genuine pace, anyone?
-
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 316 times
- Has Liked: 1106 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Is “taking one for the team” any different from “cynically fouling an opponent whose skill and speed makes us look amateurish “?
Just asking...
Just asking...
-
- Posts: 30629
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11035 times
- Has Liked: 5648 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Middle-agedClaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:33 pmIs “taking one for the team” any different from “cynically fouling an opponent whose skill and speed makes us look amateurish “?
Just asking...
Dyche mentions it in his post match interview, clearly disappointed nobody committed a tactical foul - labelled us naive
-
- Posts: 6954
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1487 times
- Has Liked: 1847 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Reminiscent of Terry Butchers non tackle on cheat Maradona
9 yr olds put in more tackles at half time in home games
9 yr olds put in more tackles at half time in home games
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:50 amDyche mentions it in his post match interview, clearly disappointed nobody committed a tactical foul - labelled us naive
After 4 consecutive seasons in the PL, being naive doesn't wash I'm afraid.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:16 am
- Been Liked: 32 times
- Has Liked: 78 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
I have looked at the replay several times and had Pieters been properly moving he was in a perfect position to take the ball cleanly, without the need to 'take one for the team. Trouble is,no right foot, although, I'm sure I will be reminded of his right footed 'spooned' clearance which became an assist against Southampton. If Dyche played him so that he could rest Taylor for this Saturday, then I am ok with that.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
Archie Gemmil Scotland against Holland 1978 World Cup scored one of the Great Goals...he beat his opponents not given a guard of honour and doffed hats has he weaved his way to goal!
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:02 pm
- Been Liked: 168 times
- Has Liked: 110 times
Re: Defending for Son's goal
I was absolutely furious at the time from the defending of this goal and I still am. The worst thing is I'll probably see it over and over again for years to come! Amateur defending