Defending for Son's goal

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Vegas Claret
Posts: 30629
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11035 times
Has Liked: 5648 times
Location: clue is in the title

Defending for Son's goal

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:40 am

just have a look at the replay around 55 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COIGsRMo-lY

No excuse to be that poor, particularly disappointed with Hendrick's lack of effort but they were all dreadful - that goal is very poor one for us

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:46 am

I thought Lowtons half arsed challenge was the pick of the bunch for that goal but the way Son ran through our team took me back to the early days of Kick Off and Sensible Soccer

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by tim_noone » Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:40 am

What defending?

Millertime v1.7
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:23 pm
Been Liked: 151 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Millertime v1.7 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:02 am

Mate, stick it in the match thread. Starting a new thread for every minor incident is why this place is in such a mess. I despair with some internet warriors sometimes.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30629
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11035 times
Has Liked: 5648 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 4:40 am

Millertime v1.7 wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:02 am
Mate, stick it in the match thread. Starting a new thread for every minor incident is why this place is in such a mess. I despair with some internet warriors sometimes.
mate, stick to your own board - you calling someone a warrior is the most pot kettle black thing I've read on here
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

ClaretLoup
Posts: 1844
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 186 times
Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by ClaretLoup » Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:29 am

TBF to Lowton he was already on a yellow. It's Pieters or McMeil who should have taken one for the team.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8499
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by jrgbfc » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:01 am

Don't think I dare watch it again. It looked bad enough live.

beddie
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1406 times
Has Liked: 518 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by beddie » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:13 am

Get use to watching it,it'll probably be shown for sometime to come and could well end up being goal of the season. :x

Grimsdale
Posts: 569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:44 am
Been Liked: 554 times
Has Liked: 80 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Grimsdale » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:19 am

Hope it's not going to become like that Eddie Gray goal against us they always show.
This user liked this post: Buxtonclaret

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:26 am

If you watch it back it is certainly McNeil who should have taken one for the team on this goal. McNeil needs to improve on his defending decisions in these sort of situations. Beyond that he was our best player by far though.

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 16728
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 3766 times
Has Liked: 7557 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:29 am

;)
Grimsdale wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:19 am
Hope it's not going to become like that Eddie Gray goal against us they always show.
Actually
said that watching the first replay of it on my stream, it'll take over from the Gray one. :lol:

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6642
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2004 times
Has Liked: 3339 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Dark Cloud » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:42 am

Lowton had already had a yellow and was the one player who couldn't foul him for that reason, but the others, probably chiefly Pieters, had plenty of chance. It was actually OUR free kick FF!! When he scored I almost burst out laughing!! It was THAT embarrassing!

Marvins Van
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:05 am
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 17 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Marvins Van » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:49 am

No doubt that Jeff Hendrick 'jogging' back almost put Son off....

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8467
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2461 times
Has Liked: 1992 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Tricky Trevor » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:15 am

Not just that goal but we backed off into our penalty area every time they ran at us. At some point you have to front them up and make them make a decision. Terrible defending all day.

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8525
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2889 times
Has Liked: 1763 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Wile E Coyote » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:19 am

apart from being applauded for being able to run from his area to ours, he only went past 2 of our players, the rest were just caught in his slipstream as he sauntered along without a care in the world.

and yes, its spurs, therefore it will be shown endlessly .

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:24 am

Tarks should have stopped him in their box. Incidentally what was tarks actually doing there.

Kanes goal was no better defending tbh.

bodge
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 729 times
Has Liked: 475 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by bodge » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:31 am

It was clear from the big screen replays that Hendrick did not do enough and should have got in a position to take Son out or get a challenge in, a few others Lowton excepted could also have taken one for the team.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by tiger76 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:40 am

This goal shows how much we need a defensive midfielder to protect the backline,there's no way Son should be allowed to run 70 yards without a challenge/tactical foul being made,naivety at best and lack of effort at worst.summed up the 90 minutes,we threw the towel in after 10 minutes,that's unacceptable at any level.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:43 am

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:46 am
I thought Lowtons half arsed challenge was the pick of the bunch for that goal but the way Son ran through our team took me back to the early days of Kick Off and Sensible Soccer
Seen it back and it was McNeil not Lowton who made the pathetic attempt of a tackle I was on about so he now wins 1st prize for me

Helmshore Claret
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:16 am
Been Liked: 32 times
Has Liked: 78 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Helmshore Claret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

On Friday, I asked for:
A decent performance for the travelling fans (didn't get it)
No yellow cards to 'key players'.
No injuries.
We all knew that we were likely to get a good hiding, so no shocks there. Perhaps Dyche told them "And remember lads don't start taking 'one for the team' " if so I would back him.

Murger
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1243 times
Has Liked: 845 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Murger » Sun Dec 08, 2019 12:42 pm

It gets worse the more times you watch it. Beyond amateur.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:02 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:43 am
Seen it back and it was McNeil not Lowton who made the pathetic attempt of a tackle I was on about so he now wins 1st prize for me
If you’d have been at the stadium you’d have seen it on the big screens and come to that conclusion much earlier, perhaps even yesterday as most of us did.

Tbh McNeil is largely to blame for not fouling Son for the 3rd and for poor control on the first.

He was brilliant after that though

Steve1956
Posts: 17249
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6488 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Fife

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:05 pm

The stream I watched the commentators were screaming goal of the season,I'm 63 and I could have run from one end of the pitch tut tuther and scored that unchallenged ,goal of the season ...what a load of boll0cks
These 2 users liked this post: Dark Cloud tim_noone

CoolClaret
Posts: 7385
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2236 times
Has Liked: 2142 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:07 pm

Pieters had the opportunity to go through him and he pulled out - total bitch move in my opinion
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:13 pm

Hibsclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:02 pm
If you’d have been at the stadium you’d have seen it on the big screens and come to that conclusion much earlier, perhaps even yesterday as most of us did.

Tbh McNeil is largely to blame for not fouling Son for the 3rd and for poor control on the first.

He was brilliant after that though
Had better things to do yesterday thanks. Hope VAR isnt getting you too down fella it really isnt worth all your angst

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6642
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2004 times
Has Liked: 3339 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Dark Cloud » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:54 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:24 am
Tarks should have stopped him in their box. Incidentally what was tarks actually doing there.

Kanes goal was no better defending tbh.
Tarks was in their box for OUR free kick and it actually wasn't that bad a free kick tbh and went pretty much straight to him, but he failed to gather it and control it and the rest is (allegedly :roll: ) goal of the f'ing season!!
This user liked this post: tim_noone

BOYSIE31
Posts: 2357
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:46 pm
Been Liked: 264 times
Has Liked: 1112 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by BOYSIE31 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:39 pm

I would lock them all up in a room tomorrow and put this goal on a tv on repeat for 2 hours
This user liked this post: tim_noone

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by tim_noone » Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:46 pm

Steve1956 wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:05 pm
The stream I watched the commentators were screaming goal of the season,I'm 63 and I could have run from one end of the pitch tut tuther and scored that unchallenged ,goal of the season ...what a load of boll0cks
Exactly this Steve.....

Steve1956
Posts: 17249
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6488 times
Has Liked: 2911 times
Location: Fife

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:59 pm

tim_noone wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:46 pm
Exactly this Steve.....
In fact Bella Emberg herself could have scored it ;)

dougcollins
Posts: 6705
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1818 times
Has Liked: 1796 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by dougcollins » Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:20 pm

As much as I like Son, he's not Maradona.

Though we made him look like it.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:13 pm
Had better things to do yesterday thanks. Hope VAR isnt getting you too down fella it really isnt worth all your angst
Still had time to suggest I hadn’t been though....

strayclaret
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:30 pm
Been Liked: 78 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by strayclaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:11 pm

Dark Cloud wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:54 pm
Tarks was in their box for OUR free kick and it actually wasn't that bad a free kick tbh and went pretty much straight to him, but he failed to gather it and control it and the rest is (allegedly :roll: ) goal of the f'ing season!!
Tarks had his shirt pulled at the free kick and lost valuable time rightly complaining to the ref. Whether it made any difference is anyone’s guess.

randomclaret2
Posts: 6902
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by randomclaret2 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:16 pm

Pathetic "defending '

boatshed bill
Posts: 15236
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3156 times
Has Liked: 6744 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:21 pm

When a player camn dribble faster than any of our players can run 50 metres there's something very wrong.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Papabendi
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:29 pm
Been Liked: 347 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Papabendi » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:51 pm

A recruitment drive that means players signed going forwards, have genuine pace, anyone?

Middle-agedClaret
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 316 times
Has Liked: 1106 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Middle-agedClaret » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:33 pm

Is “taking one for the team” any different from “cynically fouling an opponent whose skill and speed makes us look amateurish “?
Just asking...

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30629
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11035 times
Has Liked: 5648 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:50 am

Middle-agedClaret wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:33 pm
Is “taking one for the team” any different from “cynically fouling an opponent whose skill and speed makes us look amateurish “?
Just asking...

Dyche mentions it in his post match interview, clearly disappointed nobody committed a tactical foul - labelled us naive

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6954
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1487 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Woodleyclaret » Mon Dec 09, 2019 6:55 am

Reminiscent of Terry Butchers non tackle on cheat Maradona
9 yr olds put in more tackles at half time in home games
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Murger
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1243 times
Has Liked: 845 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Murger » Mon Dec 09, 2019 7:57 am

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:50 am
Dyche mentions it in his post match interview, clearly disappointed nobody committed a tactical foul - labelled us naive

After 4 consecutive seasons in the PL, being naive doesn't wash I'm afraid.

Helmshore Claret
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:16 am
Been Liked: 32 times
Has Liked: 78 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by Helmshore Claret » Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:26 pm

I have looked at the replay several times and had Pieters been properly moving he was in a perfect position to take the ball cleanly, without the need to 'take one for the team. Trouble is,no right foot, although, I'm sure I will be reminded of his right footed 'spooned' clearance which became an assist against Southampton. If Dyche played him so that he could rest Taylor for this Saturday, then I am ok with that.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by tim_noone » Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:55 pm

beddie wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:13 am
Get use to watching it,it'll probably be shown for sometime to come and could well end up being goal of the season. :x
Archie Gemmil Scotland against Holland 1978 World Cup scored one of the Great Goals...he beat his opponents not given a guard of honour and doffed hats has he weaved his way to goal!

damo_whitehead
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:02 pm
Been Liked: 168 times
Has Liked: 110 times

Re: Defending for Son's goal

Post by damo_whitehead » Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:58 pm

I was absolutely furious at the time from the defending of this goal and I still am. The worst thing is I'll probably see it over and over again for years to come! Amateur defending

Post Reply