Well, you can stay at home!!!
Perhaps shopping with the missus is your preferred Sat afternoon.
Hear ... bloody hear ...bloody hear ...exilecanada wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:14 pmI really don’t understand some posters on this board……………what do the ‘naysayers’ want? Do they really expect us to outplay teams with far more resources than us? I was around to see Jimmy Mac, Adamson, Angus, Elder, Lochhead et al and, I for one, never expected to see Burnley back in the PL! We should be proud to support Burnley and cherish the run we’ve enjoyed for the last decade, it won’t last forever. Sure, many games are heart stopping to watch, especially late in the half or late in the game when the score is close, there are times I daren’t watch! For all the faults, it can be bloody exciting stuff! It’s easy to support teams such as Citeh, supporting Burnley takes gonads!
I can guarantee Dyche would love to have access to a blank cheque book to buy all the talent he ever wanted, however I recollect Garlick saying he won’t put BFC in financial jeopardy, or words that effect. So far he’s true to his word! It doesn’t take brain surgeon to realize overspending leads to disaster in footy, not to mention the real world.
End of rant.
Very harsh thought he along with the back four were brilliant today. Along with Cork and Westwood.Paint it claret wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 7:42 pmCan’t watch much more of Peters
Sooner have ward back
nice sentiment, but as we all know that diehard mentality is only valid for two or three thousand fans when the going gets really bad. As was seen when we hit the skids and were grubbing around in the old 4th division.Aclaret wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 6:59 pmSome people can swap there teams at will and watch anyone. As a fan of 50 odd years, after its been passed on through the genes by your Dad and Grandad before, I'm afraid there's no option, you stick with your team and watch what's on offer. I'm a Burnley fan. Well that's me anyway.
We are in this league because we are masters in second ball retention, following a long ball thus bypassing the centre field of probably £200m plus of any other team. A good tactic. But we are are amongst to oldest age profile in the league, so again yes recruitment is a problem and that seems to be clear to 90% of us clarets fans including Dyche but not you?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:11 pmVery poor recruitment? Ha ha ha. If we’d had poor recruitment we wouldn’t be in this league.
I think the point is that recruitment is now very difficult because of the ridiculous demands of clubs, players and agents. When someone like Steve Webster costs Brighton £25m then you must realise what Dyche is saying about the market.ClaretAL wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 9:10 pmWe are in this league because we are masters in second ball retention, following a long ball thus bypassing the centre field of probably £200m plus of any other team. A good tactic. But we are are amongst to oldest age profile in the league, so again yes recruitment is a problem and that seems to be clear to 90% of us clarets fans including Dyche but not you?
I don't believe that for one minute....inc. Steve in that to.
If that was correct lets look at more recently, Gibson and Vydra, effectively we are responsible of destroying their what look like potentially massive career due to not being played at record transfer budgets for our club. How can you describe this as successful? our age profile alone says its not?TVC15 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 9:33 pmI think the point is that recruitment is now very difficult because of the ridiculous demands of clubs, players and agents. When someone like Steve Webster costs Brighton £25m then you must realise what Dyche is saying about the market.
Fortunately for us that in-spite of this Dyche has done a brilliant job with his recruitment which is very easy to check over his tenure at the club and compare to any club in the division....if that is a “problem” then all other clubs will have bigger problems.
You might also want to read the recent report on the state of finances of the Championship clubs to get an even better understanding about why we are running the club as we are.
1) because I don’t look at 2 transfers in isolation over a 7 year periodClaretAL wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 9:36 pmIf that was correct lets look at more recently, Gibson and Vydra, effectively we are responsible of destroying their what look like potentially massive career due to not being played at record transfer budgets for our club. How can you describe this as successful? our age profile alone says its not?
"How you can say our recruitment is not successful when it’s resulted in the most successful period in our history off the pitch and for the last 50 years on the pitch ?"TVC15 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 9:55 pm1) because I don’t look at 2 transfers in isolation over a 7 year period
2) because we are still in the Premier league.
How you can say our recruitment is not successful when it’s resulted in the most successful period in our history off the pitch and for the last 50 years on the pitch ?
Just have a look at the crap you are posting.
It wouldn’t matter if we had a team of 62 year olds if we were staying up and posting £30m profit a season.
We will get relegated at some point - other than 5 or 6 teams in the 30 years of the Premier League all the other 50 or so teams have been relegated. My guess there is few of them who will have left the league with no debt and the profit reserves we will have accumulated when we do.
Some of our fans have criticised Dyche’s recruitment from the start of his tenure - 7 years and half a billion of income generated later they will probably still say they “told us so” when we do eventually go down !!
Success in football is based on howe well the team plays, not on how much the subs cost. Ben Mee and Ben Gibson cost £15.5m between them and we are 12th in the Premier League. It would make no difference to the success of our recruitment if Mee had cost £15m and Gibson £500k - we would be in the same position and therefore would have had the same success.ClaretAL wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 10:04 pm"How you can say our recruitment is not successful when it’s resulted in the most successful period in our history off the pitch and for the last 50 years on the pitch ?"
Based on what?? its the first time we have been in the last 50 years at the top table? we have transfer record players warming the bench, how can this ever be successful?.
Apart from you recruit to improve? Our recruits dont play?dsr wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 10:07 pmSuccess in football is based on howe well the team plays, not on how much the subs cost. Ben Mee and Ben Gibson cost £15.5m between them and we are 12th in the Premier League. It would make no difference to the success of our recruitment if Mee had cost £15m and Gibson £500k - we would be in the same position and therefore would have had the same success.
Like you that doesn’t make any sense.ClaretAL wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 10:04 pm"How you can say our recruitment is not successful when it’s resulted in the most successful period in our history off the pitch and for the last 50 years on the pitch ?"
Based on what?? its the first time we have been in the last 50 years at the top table? we have transfer record players warming the bench, how can this ever be successful?.
Yes really odd, Burnley fans on a Burnley forum not liking criticism of their team and taking it personally.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 7:29 pmWhat a strange set of responses to my first post on this thread
All I said is I don’t want a season ticket anymore because I don’t enjoy the football anymore, not that I’m never going on again and that I’m going to support Rovers and I hate Burnley FC
Some of you need to seriously get a grip. Talk about taking things personally. Really really odd
Bye hope you stop posting drivel on here tooksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 6:42 pmUtterly shite isn’t it.
This season will be my last with a season ticket for a while. At least until we get someone who wants us to play some football.
For some fans it’s all about the winning, fair enough, but I prefer to enjoy the football on show rather than looking at the table afterwards. I’m obviously in the minority’s there but so be it.
I’m a pretty positive Burnley fan and I loved the game today because it was a battle and not the tippy tappy ******** we gat forced fed as proper every week on Sky.... But to say Pieters was brilliant !!!!! Wow now that is delusional hahahacricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:47 pmVery harsh thought he along with the back four were brilliant today. Along with Cork and Westwood.
Hendrick was missing. We had zero width especially that side. Wood and Barnes weren't great but as ever when they are together caused problems and one bagged.
Wasn't pretty. But 3 points is more important than pretty!
To be fair I agree with a lot of what you say, bit our current age profile suggest the bubble is about to burst. This is due to lack of recruitment or lack of promotion of youth. Dyche himself points out restlessly that the model fo the club means he can not improve the squad as most managers can.TVC15 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 10:17 pmLike you that doesn’t make any sense.
You have a very strange way of defining success. Picking out a couple of signings that have not worked out whilst forgetting the many many more that have and even stranger ignoring the facts that the period under the current manager is the most successful sustained period since the 1960s.
Every club makes mistakes in the transfer market - it’s about minimising those mistakes and not putting the club in financial risk by doing so. Tell me another club who has had fewer mistakes in the market than Burnley and been in the premier league for at least as long as we have.
who are they ?ClaretAL wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 10:32 pmTo be fair I agree with a lot of what you say, bit our current age profile suggest the bubble is about to burst. This is due to lack of recruitment or lack of promotion of youth. Dyche himself points out restlessly that the model fo the club means he can not improve the squad as most managers can.
My own opinion is we have at least another 2 Dwight McNeils sat in the u23s that could make a step up.
The same Pieters who is 31 and could not get a regular game for Stoke last season
Wake up man, we haven’t got the spending power of half the Championship teams, never mind the Prem teams. We play the way we do because that’s the level of the players we have, and the best way for us to get points. We can’t afford to go out and bring in flair players, we go and get the players SD thinks will help and strengthen the team we have, however old they are. That is a fact of life so embrace it, or go and support someone else.ClaretAL wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:00 pmWe have had an extended stay in the highest lucrative league in the world, on minimal wages and very poor recruitment. Obviously not Barcelona, but we should have the advantage over lets say Championship clubs with the millions of profit..... but we dont, and thats down to purse Dyche is being given, and the reason Dyche keeps bringing it up interviews. You cant blame him and this board will be the downfall of the club if they dont start waking up.
I predict we will come comfortably above Sheff U.Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 6:28 pmIt’s not pretty! Every other team comment about it and I’ve never really taken notice, just thought it was bitter. People talk of Stoke and how the grass wasn’t greener, we play far worse football than them! Look at Sheff Utd, that’s how we should be playing
That sounds like a WIN / WIN for the rest of us.
We play that way every week though, let's not pretend it was down to the conditions.Stalbansclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:08 amYou'd rather gouge out your own eyes than watch Burnley win in the Premier League ?....... truly bizarre.
Have you ever played football in conditions like that btw ? And if so did you bestride the midfield like a mixture of peak-era Xavi and Bergkamp combined ? Or maybe adopt a more pragmatic style , especially in a game where a win was vital.