ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Have to say I'm stunned with this news although probably not quite as much as the Huddersfield chairman but at least we've got our new CEO
See link
https://www.uptheclarets.com/hart-to-re ... eld-u-turn
See link
https://www.uptheclarets.com/hart-to-re ... eld-u-turn
-
- Posts: 10326
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3341 times
- Has Liked: 1961 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Seemed like the most likely outcome once the Baldwin announcement was made.
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Lol bet Huddersfield are a bit hacked off with that.
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
If that what has been said publicly, imagine the rage behind closed doors.
Makes sense from our point of view and Hart's point of view, but at the same time you can fully understand Huddersfields frustration.
Maybe they van get the ex EFL CEO and it's all gone full circle.
-
- Posts: 11530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3189 times
- Has Liked: 1870 times
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
I'm assuming, if as stated, he has signed a commitment to Huddersfield then there will be some sort of "compensation" to pay
-
- Posts: 10913
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5560 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Can't imagine they'd want to do business with us now if we were
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
In the world of work you have to look after number 1. I'm sure at times most of us have been treated badly by an employer. Being a gentleman is all well and good, but you have to do what's best for you and your family.
-
- Posts: 30704
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11051 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Doesn't the breach of contract rule only apply once employment has started ? I don't know, just asking the questionClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:17 pmYou would think so at least, he's in breach of contract.
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
I don't know to be honest, but the contract was signed when Hart insisted that Huddersfield go public so our community could advertise for his replacement.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:33 pmDoesn't the breach of contract rule only apply once employment has started ? I don't know, just asking the question
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
There is a probationary period in any new job so he can walk away at any time in that period no questions asked.
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
It's a strange one. Huddersfield will be fuming but I don't think he'd owe them anything financially. He's signed an employment contract but he'd be in his rights to resign from the job as soon as he started, so I'm not sure what's different here. He'd be expected to work a notice if he'd actually started the job but usually that's just to keep your employer sweet for a decent reference, something he doesn't need.
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Many years ago now I read Up The Organisation by Robert Townsend. In it he mentions recruitment and promotions. He favoured recruiting and promoting from within rather than externally. His view, and it is one that I share, is that if you promote from within even if the person is only about 70% "there" for the role, if they are as capable as you think then he/she will over the next few months grow into the role. This has the benefit of having someone in your organisation who already know the ethos of how you work and has the added benefit of showing other staff members that hard work can get you promoted.
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 308 times
- Has Liked: 350 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
You can give back word on accepting a role both legally and because you’re in control of your own self. There’s always cooling off periods.
-
- Posts: 30704
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11051 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Breaching an employment contract before the start dateClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:39 pmI don't know to be honest, but the contract was signed when Hart insisted that Huddersfield go public so our community could advertise for his replacement.
An employment contract is binding once an unconditional offer of employment has been accepted by the employee. Therefore, any breach of a term of the employment contract by the employer or employee after the time of acceptance of a contract by the employee, will be a breach of the employment contract.
There might be a breach of employment before the start date by the employee, for example:
if the employee accepts a job offer but then changes their mind and decides that they do not wish to join the employer after all. Once the contract has been signed there is a contract in place and failing to start as planned and carry out duties under the contract is technically a breach, unless terminated by agreement with the employer or otherwise in accordance with the contract;
Whilst technically, there will be a breach of contract in all of the above cases, unless there has been significant provable loss as a result of the breach by the employee, it is more likely that the employer would concentrate their time, costs and efforts in securing a replacement recruit instead of looking to sue the prospective employee for a breach of contract such as the above.
So I think you are correct in saying he has breached his contract
-
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 349 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Unfortunate that Huddersfield have been messed around but pleased he’s sticking around. Knows the club, knows Dyche and what he’s achieved with the community arm has been absolutely outstanding. He appears to be someone who came in with a vision and more importantly has been able to make that a reality - very impressive character.
-
- Posts: 9318
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4842 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
A totally bizarre situation. All I’ll say on this is that it doesn’t paint a pretty picture of things.
-
- Posts: 10326
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3341 times
- Has Liked: 1961 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
In more ways than one.
-
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 349 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
I’d say it paints a pretty good picture when you think about it. We acted decisively to secure a candidate once Baldwin’s departure was confirmed and put our clubs needs above some vague moral obligation to a competitor (albeit in another league for now). We’ve now got a situation when the new Chief can spend the rest of this season having a full in-depth handover so he’s in a position to hit the ground running when he comes into post proper.
If we’d gazumped another club to sign a player under the same circumstances then we’d be praising the club.
These are multi million pound companies. If we can ensure a seamless transition to a key position then I’ll take it. As other posters have said, this happens in business all the time.
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
I don't think our club have done anything wrong in offering him the job but the simple fact is that he's contracted to Huddersfield from March and you would have expected him to honour that or for the two clubs to discuss the situation.FeedTheArf wrote: ↑Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:50 pmI’d say it paints a pretty good picture when you think about it. We acted decisively to secure a candidate once Baldwin’s departure was confirmed and put our clubs needs above some vague moral obligation to a competitor (albeit in another league for now). We’ve now got a situation when the new Chief can spend the rest of this season having a full in-depth handover so he’s in a position to hit the ground running when he comes into post proper.
If we’d gazumped another club to sign a player under the same circumstances then we’d be praising the club.
These are multi million pound companies. If we can ensure a seamless transition to a key position then I’ll take it. As other posters have said, this happens in business all the time.
-
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 406 times
- Location: Chalfont St. Giles
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
There is typically a 1 month notice period during the probationary period. After this the full notice period can be enforced (though it can be negotiated).
He hasn’t started the role yet, and isn’t due to begin u TIL March thereby submitting notice now satisfies the original 1 month term.
There maybe be recruitment fees that have been spent which cannot be recovered, so I can understand the frustration on this point.
However having changed jobs twice in the past 18 months, you have to look after number one. Better the devil you know and all that (in this case). He’ll soon know whether he has made the right choice.
He hasn’t started the role yet, and isn’t due to begin u TIL March thereby submitting notice now satisfies the original 1 month term.
There maybe be recruitment fees that have been spent which cannot be recovered, so I can understand the frustration on this point.
However having changed jobs twice in the past 18 months, you have to look after number one. Better the devil you know and all that (in this case). He’ll soon know whether he has made the right choice.
This user liked this post: deanothedino
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 5:46 pm
- Been Liked: 412 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Wonder if Huddersfield kept the receipt
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
- Been Liked: 329 times
- Has Liked: 374 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
It's just a shame it wasn't Forest he was off to.. would've made up for the Lansbury last minute change of heart
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
So, within this announcement, Mr Garlick takes up the role of Executive Chairman.
What, if any, is the difference between that title and just Chairman
We then have a position of CEO - Mr Baldwin
We then have a position of Chief Operating Officer - Mr Williams
We then have Technical Director - Mr Rigg
We then have Head of Football and Club secretary - now vacant
We then have Head of Recruitment - Sorry but can't remember the guy's name
Just asking about Mr Garlicks title/role CT !
What, if any, is the difference between that title and just Chairman
We then have a position of CEO - Mr Baldwin
We then have a position of Chief Operating Officer - Mr Williams
We then have Technical Director - Mr Rigg
We then have Head of Football and Club secretary - now vacant
We then have Head of Recruitment - Sorry but can't remember the guy's name
Just asking about Mr Garlicks title/role CT !
-
- Posts: 67879
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
The Head of Football and Club Secretary job has gone, been replaced with Matt Williams becoming CEO. I've no idea what the executive means ahead of chairman, he's very hands on already. Maybe he'll now get a salary (but that's just a guess). Dave Baldwin continues in his role of CEO until June while Mike Rigg (Technical Director) and Martin Hodge (Head of Recruitment) are part of the football side of the business.jojomk1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:33 amSo, within this announcement, Mr Garlick takes up the role of Executive Chairman.
What, if any, is the difference between that title and just Chairman
We then have a position of CEO - Mr Baldwin
We then have a position of Chief Operating Officer - Mr Williams
We then have Technical Director - Mr Rigg
We then have Head of Football and Club secretary - now vacant
We then have Head of Recruitment - Sorry but can't remember the guy's name
Just asking CT !
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Was the decision reversed by VAR ??
This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1029 times
- Has Liked: 1521 times
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
Send em the other one!
Re: ARTICLE: Hart to replace Baldwin after Huddersfield u-turn
So is the Community job still being advertised ?