Ederson

[Funkydrummer]

Sent off after 11 minutes for foul outside the area.

[conyoviejo]

Did the ref actually make the decision or was it another VAR inspired decision?

[tim_noone]

Did the ref actually make the decision or was it another VAR inspired decision?

Another disgusting decision...

[conyoviejo]

Didn't see it Tim. Will check it out later..

[jrgbfc]

Absolute shambles....

[Funkydrummer]

Don't know, only saw him walking off.

Penalty now to City - Sterling takes . . . . . . . .

and it's saved !!!!

VAR deemed 'keeper moved and re-take.

2nd attempt, saved, but goal on the rebound.

0-1

EDIT :- For "moved" read "encroached" !!!!!!

[jrgbfc]

Never a penalty in the first place.

[Vegas Claret]

Another disgusting decision...

??? he nearly took his arm off - how is that a wrong decision to send him off ??

[Vegas Claret]

Never a penalty in the first place.

how was it not ?? stonewaller

[wilks_bfc]

Don't know, only saw him walking off.

Penalty now to City - Sterling takes . . . . . . . .

and it's saved !!!!

VAR deemed 'keeper moved and re-take.

2nd attempt, saved, but goal on the rebound.

0-1

So has there only been “one” penalty awarded?

Sky shows Sterling missing a penalty on 24 and another on 25, then scoring but surely if a retake was awarded then the first miss shouldn’t count (thinking of fantasy football points )

[Funkydrummer]

It's all a matter of opinion, as highlighted on this thread.

For my money, he deserved sending off, but no penalty at the other end.

[tim_noone]

??? he nearly took his arm off - how is that a wrong decision to send him off ??

I do apologise.... I meant the penalty....and re take.

[Funkydrummer]

Only one penalty, twice taken.

[tim_noone]

Didn't see it Tim. Will check it out later..

Erm....not to confuse it was the penalty given to city and the re take for encroachment it seems city were allowed to encroach.strange....

[Vegas Claret]

I do apologise.... I meant the penalty....and re take.

re-take was correct too but what I didn't see a replay of was of the second take - did any City players encroach on that one ?

[tim_noone]

re-take was correct too but what I didn't see a replay of was of the second take - did any City players encroach on that one ?

I'm just checking VAR

[Funkydrummer]

erased

[Hopey1786]

Wasnt a red

[Rileybobs]

re-take was correct too but what I didn't see a replay of was of the second take - did any City players encroach on that one ?

According to Dermot Gallagher it wouldn't have mattered if they had. Last week he said that players would not be penalised for encroachment if their encroachment doesn't give them an advantage.

[Ashingtonclaret46]

Get used to it, football will never be the same again at the top level because the use of technology will ensure that everything must be 100% correct. They will introduce more and more until they can dispense with onfield officials and everybody will be happy.

[tim_noone]

Get used to it, football will never be the same again at the top level because the use of technology will ensure that everything must be 100% correct. They will introduce more and more until they can dispense with onfield officials and everybody will be happy.

That will be a sad day...
Not abusing mason!!

[Woodleyclaret]

Never a red card as we know Wolves are cheating divers

[Vegas Claret]

According to Dermot Gallagher it wouldn't have mattered if they had. Last week he said that players would not be penalised for encroachment if their encroachment doesn't give them an advantage.

yeah that's my understanding, but had Bernadho Silva blocked a Wolves player from getting to the rebound for example then I wonder if that would have been given

[Rileybobs]

yeah that's my understanding, but had Bernadho Silva blocked a Wolves player from getting to the rebound for example then I wonder if that would have been given

Possibly. If the Wolves player had not touched the ball and let the City player, who had also encroached, score from the rebound, Wolves would have had a free kick.

[Vegas Claret]

Possibly. If the Wolves player had not touched the ball and let the City player, who had also encroached, score from the rebound, Wolves would have had a free kick.

would it be a free kick or yet another re-take ?

[Rileybobs]

would it be a free kick or yet another re-take ?

Surely a free kick rather than a re-take as the Man City player would have benefited from getting to the rebound first.

[Nonayforever]

It took me a minute or two to suss out how a penalty was being retaken by Sterling when Ederson had been sent off for a foul outside the area.

[Steve1956]

Benjamin Mendy cost £56 million even Pep fuucks up now and then

[IanMcL]

Definite sending off. Keeper done.

Pen soft.

Sterling....worst pen taker ever allowed to take one! His whole body said...the ball is going here, to the keeper.

[tim_noone]

Benjamin Mendy cost £56 million even Pep fuucks up now and then

Who's Benjamin mendy?

[Steve1956]

Who's Benjamin mendy?

Gifted Wolves the winner tonight,he's about six foot 2 and about 16 st got bundled off the ball like a little street urchin,that's Benjamin Mendy.

[tim_noone]

Gifted Wolves the winner tonight,he's about six foot 2 and about 16 st got bundled off the ball like a little street urchin,that's Benjamin Mendy.

I'll buy him a pint when I see him....that's Benjamin Mendy.

[Steve1956]

I'll buy him a pint when I see him....that's Benjamin Mendy.

Timbob....don't have any more drink go to bed.