ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
-
- Posts: 67784
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32405 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Daniel Farke & Sean Dyche on today's game
See link
https://www.uptheclarets.com/we-didnt-f ... -win-games
See link
https://www.uptheclarets.com/we-didnt-f ... -win-games
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
The last paragraph said it all
He's not really arsed about losing today
He's not really arsed about losing today
-
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1696 times
- Has Liked: 789 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Totally agree-he gave it away in that last section. He doesn't care a Castlemaine 4X for being out of the Cup
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
He doesn’t give to shiny a hits about today’s result or cups in general not the fans who turned up and paid.
-
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2218 times
- Has Liked: 2207 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
That won't include you then.cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:04 pmHe doesn’t give to shiny a hits about today’s result or cups in general not the fans who turned up and paid.
This user liked this post: Burnleyareback2
-
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 507 times
- Has Liked: 1037 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Think he summed it up perfectly after selecting as strong a team as I would have hoped for or expected. He did what I hoped for this year, we were just beaten by the better team on the day, just as Man U were beaten by the better team on Wednesday. It’s football. We’ll still finish top half.
-
- Posts: 3313
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Reading the post match interview & other interviews, listening to informed rumours, speaking to people quite high up within the club I have formed an opinion which doesn't bode well for the club.
At his last interview when asked if there might be incoming transfers he said " no" next question.
Rumour has it that the club is up for sale which is a result of conflicts within the club.
We have seen very little investment in future players for the club, only players such as Crouch etc to keep Dyche where he is.
The board would be ok with a yo-yo club making money and offering good entertainment, that's what any business man would want. They don't want hassle.
S D wants success for himself, which obviously means success for the club, but that, unfortunately can only be measured in Premier League terms. Hence the cup runs.
Hence the type of players coming to the club, Rodriguez, Pieters, Lennon, Crouch etc. Hence the style of play.
SD runs the club in effect, that is where the conflict lies.
The board can't sack SD because ;-
a, it would cost money
b, would they get anyone equal or better
C, it would alienate fans
No other club will come in for Dyche because of his style of play.
Wages have ballooned in order to keep hold of players, recruitment has halted other than bringing in here and now players to keep us steady, the call on directors has become intolerable.
Don't get me wrong, SD has done miracles but I fear it's coming to an end. It's unfortunately going stale.
At his last interview when asked if there might be incoming transfers he said " no" next question.
Rumour has it that the club is up for sale which is a result of conflicts within the club.
We have seen very little investment in future players for the club, only players such as Crouch etc to keep Dyche where he is.
The board would be ok with a yo-yo club making money and offering good entertainment, that's what any business man would want. They don't want hassle.
S D wants success for himself, which obviously means success for the club, but that, unfortunately can only be measured in Premier League terms. Hence the cup runs.
Hence the type of players coming to the club, Rodriguez, Pieters, Lennon, Crouch etc. Hence the style of play.
SD runs the club in effect, that is where the conflict lies.
The board can't sack SD because ;-
a, it would cost money
b, would they get anyone equal or better
C, it would alienate fans
No other club will come in for Dyche because of his style of play.
Wages have ballooned in order to keep hold of players, recruitment has halted other than bringing in here and now players to keep us steady, the call on directors has become intolerable.
Don't get me wrong, SD has done miracles but I fear it's coming to an end. It's unfortunately going stale.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Correct. For the first time in eight seasons. Because I didn’t give two either
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Some good points made. I have also heard something similar.Nonayforever wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:38 pmReading the post match interview & other interviews, listening to informed rumours, speaking to people quite high up within the club I have formed an opinion which doesn't bode well for the club.
At his last interview when asked if there might be incoming transfers he said " no" next question.
Rumour has it that the club is up for sale which is a result of conflicts within the club.
We have seen very little investment in future players for the club, only players such as Crouch etc to keep Dyche where he is.
The board would be ok with a yo-yo club making money and offering good entertainment, that's what any business man would want. They don't want hassle.
S D wants success for himself, which obviously means success for the club, but that, unfortunately can only be measured in Premier League terms. Hence the cup runs.
Hence the type of players coming to the club, Rodriguez, Pieters, Lennon, Crouch etc. Hence the style of play.
SD runs the club in effect, that is where the conflict lies.
The board can't sack SD because ;-
a, it would cost money
b, would they get anyone equal or better
C, it would alienate fans
No other club will come in for Dyche because of his style of play.
Wages have ballooned in order to keep hold of players, recruitment has halted other than bringing in here and now players to keep us steady, the call on directors has become intolerable.
Don't get me wrong, SD has done miracles but I fear it's coming to an end. It's unfortunately going stale.
-
- Posts: 5870
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1695 times
- Has Liked: 2531 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Well, I turned up today and have put today's result away. Still enjoying the unexpected 6 points against two of the top teams in the league inside three days though. If priorities are different then we have to beg to differ.cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:04 pmHe doesn’t give to shiny a hits about today’s result or cups in general not the fans who turned up and paid.
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Would the performances against Leicester and even more so against Man U. have been as good and disciplined if it's going stale?Nonayforever wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:38 pmReading the post match interview & other interviews, listening to informed rumours, speaking to people quite high up within the club I have formed an opinion which doesn't bode well for the club.
At his last interview when asked if there might be incoming transfers he said " no" next question.
Rumour has it that the club is up for sale which is a result of conflicts within the club.
We have seen very little investment in future players for the club, only players such as Crouch etc to keep Dyche where he is.
The board would be ok with a yo-yo club making money and offering good entertainment, that's what any business man would want. They don't want hassle.
S D wants success for himself, which obviously means success for the club, but that, unfortunately can only be measured in Premier League terms. Hence the cup runs.
Hence the type of players coming to the club, Rodriguez, Pieters, Lennon, Crouch etc. Hence the style of play.
SD runs the club in effect, that is where the conflict lies.
The board can't sack SD because ;-
a, it would cost money
b, would they get anyone equal or better
C, it would alienate fans
No other club will come in for Dyche because of his style of play.
Wages have ballooned in order to keep hold of players, recruitment has halted other than bringing in here and now players to keep us steady, the call on directors has become intolerable.
Don't get me wrong, SD has done miracles but I fear it's coming to an end. It's unfortunately going stale.
You don't get six points like we've just done if there are big issues. You simply don't.
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 3313
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Spijed, 6 points against Man City & Liverpool doesn't alter the fact that the club has been put up for sale.
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
But I just made reference to your assertion that things are going stale, when results like the last two would indicate they aren't.Nonayforever wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:55 pmSpijed, 6 points against Man City & Liverpool doesn't alter the fact that the club has been put up for sale.
-
- Posts: 3313
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
When I say things are going stale, I'm not referring to the last few results. I'm referring to the last two transfer windows & the reason why the direction of the club is going stale.
It doesn't look like anything of significance is going to happen this window ( and I personally wouldn't want a first team signing ) other than players out.
If I owned the club, I would be bringing in two or three players for next season when the likes of Hendrick, Brady & Lennon leave.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
FFS a club owned by Burnley fans falling out because we are an established Prem club not pushing for the top four !!!! I really do not give any credence to such bull sh1t rumours no doubt coming from a cleaner who whilst cleaning an office heard the catering manager whilst referring to an out dated pie warmer saying oh of course its up for sale put two and two together and made five.
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
I'll stand to be corrected if it's proven there's legitimate "conflict" (whatever that means) at the highest levels of the club but I'm struggling to find any substance of unique worth in what you've posted under the din of clutched pearls being shattered into powder. Are you telling us, according to your well placed sources, that Burnley, while operating sustainably and without outside investment, struggles to match other premier league clubs for wages and transfer fees, and that Dyche's continued success makes him virtually unsackable?Nonayforever wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:38 pmReading the post match interview & other interviews, listening to informed rumours, speaking to people quite high up within the club I have formed an opinion which doesn't bode well for the club.
At his last interview when asked if there might be incoming transfers he said " no" next question.
Rumour has it that the club is up for sale which is a result of conflicts within the club.
We have seen very little investment in future players for the club, only players such as Crouch etc to keep Dyche where he is.
The board would be ok with a yo-yo club making money and offering good entertainment, that's what any business man would want. They don't want hassle.
S D wants success for himself, which obviously means success for the club, but that, unfortunately can only be measured in Premier League terms. Hence the cup runs.
Hence the type of players coming to the club, Rodriguez, Pieters, Lennon, Crouch etc. Hence the style of play.
SD runs the club in effect, that is where the conflict lies.
The board can't sack SD because ;-
a, it would cost money
b, would they get anyone equal or better
C, it would alienate fans
No other club will come in for Dyche because of his style of play.
Wages have ballooned in order to keep hold of players, recruitment has halted other than bringing in here and now players to keep us steady, the call on directors has become intolerable.
Don't get me wrong, SD has done miracles but I fear it's coming to an end. It's unfortunately going stale.
-
- Posts: 6418
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Dyche:
'...Tomorrow morning, I’ll reflect on whether we could have done with another round and a midweek game, in among some big league games, having had all these injuries. That business side has to be factored in.
On the emotional side, don’t get me wrong, I’m disappointed now and I’ll be disappointed tonight.
But I’ll shake it off tomorrow and move on, like we do...'
read between the lines!
'...Tomorrow morning, I’ll reflect on whether we could have done with another round and a midweek game, in among some big league games, having had all these injuries. That business side has to be factored in.
On the emotional side, don’t get me wrong, I’m disappointed now and I’ll be disappointed tonight.
But I’ll shake it off tomorrow and move on, like we do...'
read between the lines!
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 8129
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3079 times
- Has Liked: 5043 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
If we were beaten by the better team I don't think there would be as much disappointment. The truth is only one team was up for it. One team wanted to win, the other just went through the motions. It's not the result, but the performance that is questionable. If he's really not arsed, he should have made eleven changes, at least the lift from the ManU result wouldn't have been diluted.Darnhill Claret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:12 pmThink he summed it up perfectly after selecting as strong a team as I would have hoped for or expected. He did what I hoped for this year, we were just beaten by the better team on the day, just as Man U were beaten by the better team on Wednesday. It’s football. We’ll still finish top half.
-
- Posts: 5117
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1171 times
- Has Liked: 2916 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
I understand your point, but he would have been hit with pelters both ways...Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:16 amIf we were beaten by the better team I don't think there would be as much disappointment. The truth is only one team was up for it. One team wanted to win, the other just went through the motions. It's not the result, but the performance that is questionable. If he's really not arsed, he should have made eleven changes, at least the lift from the ManU result wouldn't have been diluted.
Puts a second string out (with young eager players) and he gets hammered because he doesn't take the cups seriously.
Puts a strong first team out, tells them to go for it, and gets an injuries, he gets hammered for risking our best players.
So, I think that he decided to put a strongish side out and told them he wasn't bothered about the result either way and not to risk injuries.
Not many scenarios he can win in this situation.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
He can easily win. Say he doesn’t care as it’s not a priority. What is a priority is premier league and also developing our youngsters.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:23 amI understand your point, but he would have been hit with pelters both ways...
Puts a second string out (with young eager players) and he gets hammered because he doesn't take the cups seriously.
Puts a strong first team out, tells them to go for it, and gets an injuries, he gets hammered for risking our best players.
So, I think that he decided to put a strongish side out and told them he wasn't bothered about the result either way and not to risk injuries.
Not many scenarios he can win in this situation.
In doing so he is being honest about how the club feel about the cup. And also giving up to 11 kids a game. With no pressure and actually probably a big gate who want to watch them do well.
Instead the highly thought of koikki wasn’t on the bench. In fact only one kid was.
Meanwhile Norwich will take real confidence from that game and could easily help them get some momentum.
-
- Posts: 5117
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1171 times
- Has Liked: 2916 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
So you think he wouldn't have been given grief if he played the U23 squad? Come CFC you know he would have been given grief for not taking it seriously.cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:27 amHe can easily win. Say he doesn’t care as it’s not a priority. What is a priority is premier league and also developing our youngsters.
In doing so he is being honest about how the club feel about the cup. And also giving up to 11 kids a game. With no pressure and actually probably a big gate who want to watch them do well.
Instead the highly thought of koikki wasn’t on the bench. In fact only one kid was.
Meanwhile Norwich will take real confidence from that game and could easily help them get some momentum.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Not if he was honest about the intentions. I’m a huge fan of the fa cup. And I want us to take it serious and win it. But if we aren’t going to bother I’d much rather the kids and I’d have paid to watch them.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 8:11 pmSo you think he wouldn't have been given grief if he played the U23 squad? Come CFC you know he would have been given grief for not taking it seriously.
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Big gate in the FA Cup 4th round? What we saying? 12,000 if we play the kids? Don't tell me, you and MACCA know many/plenty who would have gone on yesterday had Dyche been honest about the cup and played the kids.cricketfieldclarets wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:27 am
In doing so he is being honest about how the club feel about the cup. And also giving up to 11 kids a game. With no pressure and actually probably a big gate who want to watch them do well.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
8k would have been a big gate for the kids.
-
- Posts: 10163
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4185 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: ARTICLE: We didn’t find the details you need to win games
Went from rumour to fact in a couple of posts about being up for sale.Nonayforever wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:55 pmSpijed, 6 points against Man City & Liverpool doesn't alter the fact that the club has been put up for sale.